Started By
Message

re: Should I take my money out of the bank

Posted on 10/6/22 at 5:14 pm to
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
38423 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 5:14 pm to
Bingo.

It has happened before but people don't spend any time reading history books.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

for all you pussies who keep downvoting me ... state your case is to why this CANNOT happen


You have a cumulative 4 DVs on those two posts. Relax.
Posted by lsufan112001
sportsmans paradise
Member since Oct 2006
11096 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 8:16 pm to
When 911 hit. I couldn’t get a nickel out of my bank.
Your money is on a computer screen. And like anything else that can be compromised.
Personally I keep 5k in my home safe.
Posted by GeauxTigers777
Member since Oct 2007
1591 posts
Posted on 10/6/22 at 9:21 pm to
There is a difference between keeping cash reserves and emptying your bank account. One is reasonable; the other is unreasonable.
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
9900 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 3:52 am to
Not only should you do it but go to Vegas and put it all on black. Yolo and shite.
Posted by Asharad
Tiamat
Member since Dec 2010
6301 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 5:31 am to
quote:

Should I take my money out of the bank
Yes. Use your savings to purchase all the toilet paper. This will create another TP shortage, where you can triple your investment in less than a week.
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
20902 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 7:27 am to
quote:

if I had more than the 250k FDIC limit in a bank I'd be concerned about that excess in one institution quite frankly


Sure. It is wise to keep within the FDIC insured limit on deposit accounts. Use multiple banks if needed.

But it is likely not wise to "take my money out of the bank" like the OP said. If his house burns down, or a thief takes his cash, it's gone. (Same is true of cash in a safe deposit box; not FDIC insured, so hope the bank does not burn, flood, etc.)

If money is in an FDIC insured account, and the bank fails, he'll get the money back quickly, unless the US government fails, in which case we are all screwed no matter what.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
9643 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 7:36 am to
quote:

There is a difference between keeping cash reserves and emptying your bank account. One is reasonable; the other is unreasonable.


I agree with this .... but it is important to recognize that not all banks are created equal. Now is a time for careful consideration of your chosen banks' stability and policies.

Most people don't want to switch because it's a PITA ..... and it is, ... especially if you are required to setup online billpay with a new institution.

But it's a lot less of a PITA than having to apply and wait for FDIC reimbursement from a failed bank that was fiscally irresponsible.

Ari Gilbert, the highly touted financial advisor who bases his research heavily on Elliot Wave theory and investor sentiment, has recently stated that the fastest growing segment of his firm's business is his in-depth Bank Rating service. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4509085-is-your-bank-safe-why-should-you-care-now

It appears a lot of investors have gotten nervous about the big banks and are diversifying their funds among the safer rated institutions. Smart.
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 7:40 am
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
9643 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 7:52 am to
quote:

You think the large US banks are going to fail soon? Guess you think the Dodd-Frank stress tests are all just for show


Funny you should mention the Dodd-Frank Act, because it is precisely that legislation that provides the Big Banks with the power/permission to conduct Bail-Ins rather than wait for congressional Bail-Outs. Most Americans aren't even aware that the Big Banks can do this.

Further, buried in the Federal Budget that was introduced on March 22, 2016, under Chapter 8 – Tax Fairness and a Strong Financial Sector, was a section titled “Introducing a Bank Recapitalization ‘Bail-in’ Regime.”

Simply stated, in the unlikely event of a large bank failure, the Government proposed it would reinforce that bank shareholders and creditors are responsible for the bank’s risks – not taxpayers.

What that means is that shareholders, bondholders and depositors, rather than taxpayers, are responsible for the bank’s risks in the event of a failure.

During the 2008 crash, banks that were deemed too-big-to-fail were bailed out by the government, meaning that We The People footed the bill.

Could Big Banks fail again? .... dunno really ... anything is possible. I don't think the industry is as as risk-leveraged as before ..... but you can bet the same crooked people are still running the show ... just as before. Have they earned your complete trust?

https://www.fdic.gov/news/press-releases/2020/pr20037a.pdf
This post was edited on 10/7/22 at 7:54 am
Posted by Gabapentin
Member since Mar 2022
374 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:00 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/6/23 at 10:03 pm
Posted by DVinBR
Member since Jan 2013
15297 posts
Posted on 10/7/22 at 2:05 pm to
Posted by H newman
Member since Oct 2021
1983 posts
Posted on 10/10/22 at 3:11 pm to
It has happened before..beware
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram