Started By
Message

Inherited IRA Question

Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:36 pm
Posted by HoustonChick86
Catalina Wine Mixer
Member since Dec 2009
57243 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:36 pm
Hi Everyone. I was on the Fidelity website early getting a tax document and noticed I have to take an RMD of $1,800 on an Inherited IRA. I don't recall ever doing this so looked into it more. Well, apparently I just didn't do it the last few years. Oops.

The IRA was my grandma's (passed in 2016 at age 76), then my mom's (passed in 2019 at 59). After more reading, I see there was a law passed (SECURE Act) where Inherited IRAs must be closed within 10 years now, but I do not think this one applies as its was taken out before 2020.

So I could just sit and take small disbursements until this thing runs out (it is about $90K), but do you see any harm in just taking all the money out, holding enough to pay the income taxes it would create in 2025, paying off my student loans and then saving the money for something else.

I owe about $30K in student loans and I think the money would be better used there. I have a separate retirement account I put money into every month so no additional money is going into this account accept the daily ups and downs.

Because it is inherited and I am not a spouse, if I am correct, I do not pay a penalty to take the lump sum.

Any thoughts, suggestions?
Posted by UpstairsComputer
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2017
1568 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:43 pm to
You won't pay penalty but taking it all in one year means you pay more ordinary income tax on it.

Couple questions come up, what's the interest rate on the student loan? Do you max out your IRA each year? Do you have a retirement plan at work?

Seems like the answer depends on a lot of factors. Do you want to use it to boost your future savings, or are you more worried about now? There's probably somewhere in between as well.
Posted by BThibodeaux
Member since Jun 2005
110 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:49 pm to
A financial advisor could provide specific requirements and recommendations, but be aware that there was also a SECURE 2.0 passed in December, 2022. It was quite vague in their required annual RMD’s for inherited IRA’s, but that was clarified in July, 2023. I suggest you research that, just to help inform your future decisions.

If I am correct, RMD’s were waived for 2021, 2022 and 2023. RMD’s are now required in 2024 and beyond. I do know that RMD’s are painfully taxed at the ordinary income rate. That said, withdrawal decisions usually go way beyond taxes.

As I previously noted, a tax expert should have the accurate details on RMD’s.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84643 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 3:51 pm to
You should consider consulting a CPA. Your missed RMDs are subject to up to 50% penalties for the years you didn’t take them.

Your mom passing in 2019 and your grandmother being 76 means you should have been taking RMDs every year since 2019. Addressing that should be your first priority.


Once that’s done, you should consider how much room you have in your tax bracket each year if you plan to spend it down quicker than the RMDs. Again, consult CPA. All at once is rarely a good idea, even with interest rates on debt.


Note: I’ve been an advisor for 15 years and I’ve never seen someone actually pay a penalty on missed RMDs, but they exist on paper nonetheless. Good luck.
Posted by HoustonChick86
Catalina Wine Mixer
Member since Dec 2009
57243 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 4:15 pm to
quote:


Once that’s done, you should consider how much room you have in your tax bracket each year if you plan to spend it down quicker than the RMDs. Again, consult CPA. All at once is rarely a good idea, even with interest rates on debt.

I took that into consideration. I could take half and keep us in the same tax bracket and then take the other half another time or just disbursements from there on out.

The student loans are still $30k and I like the idea of debt free minus the house.

I guess I should find a CPA. Was hoping it was a simple answer.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84643 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 4:29 pm to
I get it. It could be a good idea but you really want to address the missed RMDs asap.
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1420 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

Your mom passing in 2019 and your grandmother being 76 means you should have been taking RMDs every year since 2019.


While I'm not an expert, here is my understanding.

I agree the OP should owe penalty for grandma's IRA as RMDs should have started in 2017. Though I have read in other forums the IRS will work with you if you contact them about missed RMDs.

However, for the mother's IRA I think OP may be ok. Since mom passed away before 2020 and was only 59, the OP should qualify for the 5 year rule. Also year 2020 doesn't count toward the 5 year rule.

So I believe the OP has till end of 2025 to fully deplete the mother's IRA w/o penalty. OP can decide each year how much to take out as long as the account is empty before 2026.

If OP doesn't want to deplete by 2026, then take RMDs like grandmother's IRA but may owe penalty for missed years.

https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/plan-participant-employee/retirement-topics-beneficiary

Take a look at section 'Non-spouse beneficiary options' under 'Death of the account holder occurred before 2020'. Also look at the definition for the 5 year rule near the bottom.
This post was edited on 2/1/24 at 6:00 pm
Posted by HoustonChick86
Catalina Wine Mixer
Member since Dec 2009
57243 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 6:08 pm to
It's all the same Inherited IRA. It was my grandmother's, then my mom's, now mine.

I'll call Fidelity and see how much I owe for the few years of missed RMDs and file those with the IRS I guess.
Posted by gpburdell
ATL
Member since Jun 2015
1420 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

It's all the same Inherited IRA. It was my grandmother's, then my mom's, now mine.


Ah ok I didn't catch that. In that case, then my statement about depleting before 2026 w/o penalty should apply. Under the 5 year rule, you did not have to start RMDs in 2020. So there should be no penalties owed currently.

Since you are thinking of taking out all the money now. I would do half in 2024 and the rest in 2025. That assumes taking the full 90k in a single year would push you into another tax bracket.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

do you see any harm in just taking all the money out, holding enough to pay the income taxes it would create in 2025,
Depending when in the year you take the disbursement you may need to file estimated quarterly taxes during the year rather than waiting to pay the taxes on the disbursal when you file your tax return.

Otherwise you may be on the hook for penalty and interest on the "late" payment.
Posted by HoustonChick86
Catalina Wine Mixer
Member since Dec 2009
57243 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 7:23 pm to
Thanks everyone! This was all very helpful and got me to the answers I needed!
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
14942 posts
Posted on 2/1/24 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

Depending when in the year you take the disbursement you may need to file estimated quarterly taxes during the year rather than waiting to pay the taxes on the disbursal when you file your tax return.

Otherwise you may be on the hook for penalty and interest on the "late" payment.


Important planning piece. Don’t fret too much though, there are exceptions to the penalty. So long as you pay 100% of last year’s tax bill or 90% of the current one (or the total amount owed is under $1,000 but that’s going to be way under the taxes due on $30k-90k unless you take advantage of “filling your brackets” and are going to take less than the cost of your loans or the lump sum (the latter of which I would probably not do outside of weird cases)) you should be fine to let the money sit in a checking/savings account until tax day, if that is beneficial to you somehow.

I had two separate income “step” ups that had me very nervous about this concept until I realize that the way the law/rule is written, so long as you make a salary (typical w2) that is at least the year prior’s amount, and you haven’t adjusted your withholding, you will pay 100% of the previous year’s tax, so it almost works out to “first time is free” when it comes to not knowing that you should pay estimates in cases like this.





But it’s worth a couple hundred bucks to a CPA for good advice and how the “stretch” rules apply to you and could be used to your advantage and the tax implications of the handful of scenarios you’re considering.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84643 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 2:02 am to
quote:

Thanks everyone! This was all very helpful and got me to the answers I needed!


As previously stated, the 5-yr rule would apply in this case as well, meaning you could avoid the RMD mess by taking the entirety of the account out by 12/31/24.

If you go that route, figure out your state and federal taxes owed with a CPA and make sure you have them withheld by the end of the year. Importantly, they do not have to come out when the original distribution is sent to you. For example, if you’ll owe $15k in federal twxes, it’s a no brainer to park that $15k in a CD or bond within the account that will mature around 11/30/24. Earning a guaranteed and extra $750 or so on your tax liability is a lot better than giving it to Uncle Sam a year earlier than necessary, and since it will all be on the same 1099, you won’t have any issues with underpayment and/or timely payment issues.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37034 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:09 am to
I think everyone is forgetting that the OP is a successor beneficiary, not a primary beneficiary.

Grandma died, mom inherited it. Then mom died. That makes OP a successor beneficiary with respect to Grandma's IRA. Importantly, both of those deaths happeend pre-SECURE Act.

As such... OP has to step into mom's shoes. This means that OP needs to take distributions from the IRA based on MOM's life expectancy, using the "minus-1" method mom would have or should have established when she inherited the IRA from grandma (so using mom's age factor as of mom's age in 2017, year after grandma died, then minus-1 each year thereafter).

As far as the 5 year rule... OP has to step into the shoes of MOM's 5 year rule... which would normally have expired Dec 31, 2021 (5 full tax years after grandma's death). Because of COVID, 2020 doesn't count, so in effect, the 5 year period ended Dec 31, 2022.

In effect, the 5 year period option is no longer available to the OP.

Welcome to the old "at least as quickly" rule for dealing with IRAs. OP must draw down grandma's IRA "at least as quickly" as mom would have.

OP needs to calculate the missed RMDs based on mom's scheduled. She needs to take, at a minimum, 2021 - 2023 immediately, and 2024 before year end. 2020, none was required. For 2019, she would need to take one only if mom did not before her 2019 passing.

OP will also need to file a 5329 penalty waiver request for each year of missed RMDs (the penalty is 50% for years before 2023, and 10% for 2023 and later if caught within a period of time). Be honest and explain exactly what happened, that you have fixed it, and you won't make this mistake again.

The IRS typically is pretty forgiving in situations such as this. The rules are confusing.

Also... if OP ALSO inherited mom's owned IRA, then the 5 year period for that one didn't start until 2020, but 2020 didn't count, so really it ends Dec 31, 2025. Or, she could take annual RMDs based on her age the year after mom's death.

This is why it is so important to not comingle IRAs. The brokers are supposed to be on top of this. However, many times, they are not.
This post was edited on 2/2/24 at 9:12 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84643 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:33 am to
quote:

I think everyone is forgetting that the OP is a successor beneficiary, not a primary beneficiary. Grandma died, mom inherited it. Then mom died. That makes OP a successor beneficiary with respect to Grandma's IRA. Importantly, both of those deaths happeend pre-SECURE Act. As such... OP has to step into mom's shoes. This means that OP needs to take distributions from the IRA based on MOM's life expectancy, using the "minus-1" method mom would have or should have established when she inherited the IRA from grandma (so using mom's age factor as of mom's age in 2017, year after grandma died, then minus-1 each year thereafter). As far as the 5 year rule... OP has to step into the shoes of MOM's 5 year rule... which would normally have expired Dec 31, 2021 (5 full tax years after grandma's death). Because of COVID, 2020 doesn't count, so in effect, the 5 year period ended Dec 31, 2022. In effect, the 5 year period option is no longer available to the OP


Great point - 5y rule would be based on grandma so we’re back to missed RMDs.

I didn’t get the impression that there was any commingled IRA funds with Mom’s IRA. That’s hard to do with a competent custodian.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37034 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:05 am to
quote:

I didn’t get the impression that there was any commingled IRA funds with Mom’s IRA


Agreed. But I always like to point that out because...

quote:

That’s hard to do with a competent custodian


You would think. But I've seen it several times. And every time, the custodian says, "oh, we didn't know".

Usually it's a name issue. For example, Slackster Sr dies, leaves IRA to Slackster Jr. When Slackster Jr dies, he leaves his IRA, and the remaining balance of Slackster Sr IRA, to Slackster III.

Slackster III doesn't understand and just tells hiw own custodian, which is not the same as the other two, hey, I need to roll these two IRAs into one for simplicity, and custodian doesn't pay attention to name differences (and sometimes... the registration doesn't even indciate Sr or Jr)

The far worse issue I've only seen once was that the successor beneficiary tried to do a 60 day rollover out of both inherited accounts into their own IRA, and because it was just a check, the custodian didn't pay attention to the source.

Oh, you can't do a 60 day rollover on an inherited IRA, so that's a taxable distribution. Fun times...
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28791 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

LSUFanHouston


Must have slept at Holiday Inn Express last night.
Posted by HoustonChick86
Catalina Wine Mixer
Member since Dec 2009
57243 posts
Posted on 2/2/24 at 6:01 pm to
quote:


OP needs to calculate the missed RMDs based on mom's scheduled. She needs to take, at a minimum, 2021 - 2023 immediately, and 2024 before year end. 2020, none was required. For 2019, she would need to take one only if mom did not before her 2019 passing.

OP will also need to file a 5329 penalty waiver request for each year of missed RMDs (the penalty is 50% for years before 2023, and 10% for 2023 and later if caught within a period of time). Be honest and explain exactly what happened, that you have fixed it, and you won't make this mistake again.

This is what I am doing.

Y'all gave great advice that led me in the right path to finding my answer.

I called Fidelity.

They laid out the missed RMD amounts for 2019, 2021, 2022, and 2023.

I withdrew just a few dollars more to make it a more round number today.

I downloaded form 5329 for each year of missed RMDs and wrote a letter explaining breakdown of missed amount each year and will attach a statement showing the funds are now out of the IRA. Basically I just stated the truth. I didn't have an advisor, had no clue what an RMD was or that I needed to be taking them. And explained it won't happen again and I'll take RMDs on time.

Once it's all settled I'll just figure out how much I can take out to close the account in the next year or so and pay off my student loan and get the rest of the money into something I have more control and knowledge of with my advisor.

Thanks all.
Posted by ArkBengal
Benton, AR
Member since Aug 2004
1921 posts
Posted on 2/3/24 at 11:08 am to
Trying to follow this. Confused though about this situation vs spousal inheritance. Schwab rep told me he didn’t think there was such a requirement (mandated withdrawal) on spouse inherited IRA any more but can anyone clarify this ?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37034 posts
Posted on 2/3/24 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

Trying to follow this. Confused though about this situation vs spousal inheritance


Spousal is a whole different ballgame.

Surviving spouses have the option to roll decedent spouse balance into surviving spouse IRA, and treat combined balance as of it was theirs all along.

This combined account then is subject to your RMD rules.
This post was edited on 2/3/24 at 2:51 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram