- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?
Posted on 10/1/21 at 9:27 pm to Ballstein32
Posted on 10/1/21 at 9:27 pm to Ballstein32
PLL is basically dead in North Carolina
Could enhance our odds with a Musk SlI deal
If that happens, game changer.
Got to think Musk is looking right now for a new partnership
Could enhance our odds with a Musk SlI deal
If that happens, game changer.
Got to think Musk is looking right now for a new partnership
1
Posted on 10/1/21 at 9:53 pm to jimjackandjose
El Dorado is conveniently located between Tennessee (Ford EV battery plant going in) and Texas (Austin, Tesla Gigafactor going in). Once JV execution occurs I’ll sleep like a baby regardless of day to day price movements…..
Posted on 10/1/21 at 10:18 pm to GeneralLee
So we are for sure due some PR, since no PEA info, would be nice for some update
Posted on 10/1/21 at 10:59 pm to L LiSTR
quote:
So we are for sure due some PR, since no PEA info, would be nice for some update
If the hat tip on Cramer was truly for us then I would expect he understands that atleast a segment of the shareholders were putting weight on that promise and date. I suspect he will update in some form shortly.
Posted on 10/1/21 at 11:03 pm to Ballstein32
Tetra has nothing to do with SLI.
That was a misconception and will be cleared up in the PEA release. That entire project is being rebranded to make the separation more apparent. Tetra’s PR says that they, Tetra, aren’t prepared to harvest. It doesn’t say Standard isn’t prepared to do it. Standard is scoping acquiring the feed stream on their own, decoupling from the bromine process.
That was a misconception and will be cleared up in the PEA release. That entire project is being rebranded to make the separation more apparent. Tetra’s PR says that they, Tetra, aren’t prepared to harvest. It doesn’t say Standard isn’t prepared to do it. Standard is scoping acquiring the feed stream on their own, decoupling from the bromine process.
Posted on 10/2/21 at 10:15 am to Fe_Mike
Sincerely hope you had a great Friday off! thanks for input
Posted on 10/2/21 at 10:19 am to Fe_Mike
Seems(thinking) that Mintak has a huge scope, seeing the BIG picture...locking in the WHOLE GULF area, AR-LA-TX-(TN)?area . He sees the future and is staking it out...big tech going on here, big brine up!
Posted on 10/2/21 at 10:23 am to Fe_Mike
being rebranded to make the separation more apparent.
IF THAT MEANS NEW HATS, DAMN I WANT ONE!
IF THAT MEANS NEW HATS, DAMN I WANT ONE!
Posted on 10/2/21 at 12:37 pm to Fe_Mike
Are there any negatives that could come as a result of decoupling from the bromine process or is this ALL positive?
Posted on 10/2/21 at 12:39 pm to LChama
I would imagine there could be more costs involved with having to pump it out of the ground on their own dime?
Posted on 10/2/21 at 2:14 pm to GeneralLee
Is it possible that those costs would be offset by not having to share profits with another company?
Posted on 10/2/21 at 3:23 pm to KCRoyalBlue
Everything to me appears they are creating separation from Lanxness or atleast developing some independence.
No JV. Built more of pilot plant than originally planned. Much expanded scope of PEA. Shelf offering application.
Tbh, I always thought lanxness was coming out like a bandit with a 70 30 stake and basically full access to the tech.
SLI full steam ahead with some independent commercialization is a much better prospect to me. Otherwise, we are dependent on JVs and FIDs for the life of the company.
No JV. Built more of pilot plant than originally planned. Much expanded scope of PEA. Shelf offering application.
Tbh, I always thought lanxness was coming out like a bandit with a 70 30 stake and basically full access to the tech.
SLI full steam ahead with some independent commercialization is a much better prospect to me. Otherwise, we are dependent on JVs and FIDs for the life of the company.
Posted on 10/2/21 at 3:44 pm to jimjackandjose
but remember this is the south...Lanxess is well known and opens doors for a CANADIAN COMPANY....all thru the GULF region....the tech is the gain...but no product, no tech.needed. 
This post was edited on 10/2/21 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 10/2/21 at 4:00 pm to L LiSTR
Thoughts from Smackover, GeneralLee, and Fe_Mike? And anyone else for that matter, of course.
I have a gut feeling that something happens next week. No basis. Just gut.
I have a gut feeling that something happens next week. No basis. Just gut.
Posted on 10/2/21 at 4:14 pm to KCRoyalBlue
That 4M share trade, likely a dark pool trade, just before the close earlier this week had to have been something. I think a big PR comes in the next two weeks is my guess, and with that we might have color on what the 4M share trade was about. Been so wrong on timelines with this that I want to leave some wiggle room! 
Posted on 10/2/21 at 4:22 pm to GeneralLee
Can you explain "dark pool" to those of us newbies?
Posted on 10/2/21 at 4:36 pm to KCRoyalBlue
Investopedia.com is the best source you will find, it really helped me when I started trading.
Posted on 10/2/21 at 4:48 pm to KCRoyalBlue
Posted on 10/2/21 at 5:05 pm to GeneralLee
So according to Morningstar.
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF Picked up 3,663,986 shares. Data updated on sept 30.
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF Picked up 3,663,986 shares. Data updated on sept 30.
Posted on 10/2/21 at 5:09 pm to Shepherd88
Damn that means this board is #3 now on the ETF biggest holders. Van Eck, Wilderhill, then TD money.
Blows a whole in my theory that that trade was a use of the shelf offering to go up to 40% on the JV…. Still could very well happen, just means it didn’t happen with that specific trade.
Blows a whole in my theory that that trade was a use of the shelf offering to go up to 40% on the JV…. Still could very well happen, just means it didn’t happen with that specific trade.
Page 394 of 946
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News