- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Connection between GME and AMC?
Posted on 6/3/24 at 8:30 am
Posted on 6/3/24 at 8:30 am
I’ve thankfully never played Hello Kitty’s game, but why do these stocks seem to mirror each others volatility?
Even this morning both are peaking early. Just don’t get the connection of why AMC tends to be an automatic by product of GME?
Even this morning both are peaking early. Just don’t get the connection of why AMC tends to be an automatic by product of GME?
Posted on 6/3/24 at 8:31 am to BabyTac
Because they were both shorted heavily beyond their available shares
Posted on 6/3/24 at 9:25 am to BabyTac
Capital markets are the world’s largest and longest lasting perpetual fundraiser. There’s a reason companies go public, they reach their debt ceiling and can no longer service it when the banks call. The security/collateral is the company itself, as the notes are convertible into equity in the event of default
Know the above, everything beyond that is finding the right market(what demo will buy the securities and at what price point). In the long run, all shares are bags
Know the above, everything beyond that is finding the right market(what demo will buy the securities and at what price point). In the long run, all shares are bags
Posted on 6/3/24 at 9:37 am to BabyTac
There is no connection between the two except that they were pumped heavily on reddit during the meme craze.
AMC leadership really diluted their shares and used retail as their piggy bank much more than GME.
AMC leadership really diluted their shares and used retail as their piggy bank much more than GME.
Posted on 6/3/24 at 9:52 am to Lolathon234
quote:
the notes are convertible into equity in the event of default
No they’re not. That would be incredibly stupid for the lender—that would put them in a worse position in bankruptcy. They’re convertible into equity upon a qualified financing event (like a later equity financing round or an IPO).
Posted on 6/3/24 at 10:18 am to AllbyMyRelf
Why do you think they're called SECURITIES? What exactly do you think they're securing? Go do some diligence on an old IPO for a blue-chip like AMZN. If you actually read through the financials, you'll realize the companies aren't profitable prior to going public
This post was edited on 6/3/24 at 10:39 am
Posted on 6/3/24 at 1:15 pm to Lolathon234
So because they’re called securities, you think that means convertible notes convert to equity upon an event of default? Have you ever read a convertible note? They remain as DEBT not EQUITY upon default. DEBT instruments are still SECURITIES under the 33 Act, but that doesn’t mean that DEBT is the same thing as EQUITY
Posted on 6/3/24 at 1:48 pm to AllbyMyRelf
Rather than going back and forth on bs, let's get down to reality. Why would any business owner/board take their company public?
If you're looking to divest and it's profitable, any number of private investment/prospective business owners will take it off your hands @ future earnings FMV. And you don't have to deal with SEC regulations/potential for the shares to devalue over a slow, drawn out liquidation
If you need capital, go to a bank or look into private equity
So that pretty much leaves: You only go public if you have no other option. And to be in that position, you must already owe the banks so much that they're willing to force your hand to cover their own position
If you're looking to divest and it's profitable, any number of private investment/prospective business owners will take it off your hands @ future earnings FMV. And you don't have to deal with SEC regulations/potential for the shares to devalue over a slow, drawn out liquidation
If you need capital, go to a bank or look into private equity
So that pretty much leaves: You only go public if you have no other option. And to be in that position, you must already owe the banks so much that they're willing to force your hand to cover their own position
This post was edited on 6/3/24 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 6/3/24 at 2:16 pm to Lolathon234
quote:I.e. “I don’t know what I’m talking about and don’t want to admit it”
Rather than going back and forth on bs, let's get down to reality.
quote:Lots of reasons. As you do mention, for capital raising or for an exit for existing investors.
Why would any business owner/board take their company public?
An IPO can sometimes be more advantageous than other financing options, especially for later stage companies who have a huge cap table. Typical shareholder agreements provide for what happens in the event of an IPO, so all the work for socializing the idea to investors has been done. Later stage companies might have a massive valuation that makes them less desirable for PE investors because they can’t buy the entire company. This is the case for one of my clients right now.
That doesn’t mean that they’re not profitable.
quote:No, you go public if it’s the best option.
You only go public if you have no other option.
quote:Not the case with my clients.
And to be in that position, you must already owe the banks so much that they're willing to force your hand to cover their own position
Posted on 6/3/24 at 2:32 pm to AllbyMyRelf
quote:
Lots of reasons. As you do mention, for capital raising or for an exit for existing investors. An IPO can sometimes be more advantageous than other financing options, especially for later stage companies who have a huge cap table. Typical shareholder agreements provide for what happens in the event of an IPO, so all the work for socializing the idea to investors has been done. Later stage companies might have a massive valuation that makes them less desirable for PE investors because they can’t buy the entire company. This is the case for one of my clients right now. That doesn’t mean that they’re not profitable.
To summarize: It's because I've reached my debt ceiling and the only remaining option is playing what amounts to a confidence trick on those that are either wreckless or too trusting with their money
quote:
No, you go public if it’s the best option.
Correct. And it's the best option when it's the only option
quote:
Not the case with my clients.
Ok, let's play a game. Find me ANY IPO's registration statement and let's break it down. I won't choose the company because that would be too easy. You're the one that is claiming they're profitable, so find me one. And we can analyze their long-term outlook without the injection of the cap via selling stock
Edit: I should clarify, I understand the reasons for markets to exist. It reallocates potentially wasted resources (excess capital that people only save because it's unnecessary for life expenses) and puts them to work, which at times sustain industries that are for the greater good. But how it's done and the bs associated with it is irritating. But I suppose it did play a large part in defeating communism
This post was edited on 6/3/24 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 6/3/24 at 2:44 pm to BabyTac
CNBC is sounds some alarm about the after hours on GME stock going higher tonight. Sounds like someone is about to get really squeezed.
Posted on 6/3/24 at 3:01 pm to Lolathon234
People invest because of potential growth, which can exist even if a company is not currently profitable.
I’m sure early investors of Google, Apple, Coca Cola, Nike really feel hoodwinked by those con-men!
I never said all or even most companies that go public are profitable, but as an investor, if I think a company will be profitable, I’d like to invest early on when they are not so I can get the best price for my shares.
quote:
the only remaining option is playing what amounts to a confidence trick on those that are either wreckless [sic] or too trusting with their money
I’m sure early investors of Google, Apple, Coca Cola, Nike really feel hoodwinked by those con-men!
quote:Why would we do that?? “Let’s see how this company does with no investment!!” Of course investments help companies grow—and that’s also the case for private investments.
And we can analyze their long-term outlook without the injection of the cap via selling stock
I never said all or even most companies that go public are profitable, but as an investor, if I think a company will be profitable, I’d like to invest early on when they are not so I can get the best price for my shares.
Back to top
