- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 401k loan for home improvement
Posted on 6/20/19 at 5:26 pm to fillmoregandt
Posted on 6/20/19 at 5:26 pm to fillmoregandt
Taking a loan out a solo 401k where u can pay yourself interest and deposit way more than you withdrew is great. In a normal one like yours not so much. Find other avenues.
Posted on 6/20/19 at 7:58 pm to weagle99
quote:
So in 2019 I will have paid $800 in taxes to get the other money $10,000 and then on the disbursement pay taxes again (which would at that point be a wash with pretax contributions).
If I understand your question then yes. This would be no different than you paying off a loan from a bank using post income tax money.
The point is that the principal portion of a 401k loan isn't taxed twice. The principal isn't taxed at all assuming you pay the loan back. Taxation doesn't happen till you take a disbursement.
Take a look at this as it might be clearer
https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/1bbqp8/psa_401k_loans_are_not_double_taxed/
Posted on 6/21/19 at 5:04 am to fillmoregandt
HELOCs or even refinancing a vehicle that is currently debt free are better options
Posted on 6/22/19 at 2:57 pm to MontyFranklyn
How do most 401k loans work?
At my previous employer, they functioned more like a LOC (as I understood it). The money never actually left your account, and you were never punished for it by pausing contributions or other ways. It was simply loaned to you against the value in your account, you paid the interest to yourself. Is there a negative to a loan in this manner?
Current employer pulls the loan value from a proportion of your investments (eg cant pull just from bonds) and reinvests them upon repayment.
At my previous employer, they functioned more like a LOC (as I understood it). The money never actually left your account, and you were never punished for it by pausing contributions or other ways. It was simply loaned to you against the value in your account, you paid the interest to yourself. Is there a negative to a loan in this manner?
Current employer pulls the loan value from a proportion of your investments (eg cant pull just from bonds) and reinvests them upon repayment.
Posted on 6/24/19 at 9:09 am to LSUtigerME
I'm very interested in this subject.
I am looking to buy a rent house with cash because I can get a better deal. Instead of using my savings, I'm exploring a 401K loan for $50K.
My plan is to use the 401K loan to purchase and fix the home and then refinance the home with a conventionsl mortgage based on a new appraisal and pay 401K back within 2-4 months. So I'm only coming out of pocket about $2500 for this transaction: the fees and notes while I renovate. Cash flow on the home should be about 10K per year.
Can someone tell me why a Heloc would be a better route?
I am looking to buy a rent house with cash because I can get a better deal. Instead of using my savings, I'm exploring a 401K loan for $50K.
My plan is to use the 401K loan to purchase and fix the home and then refinance the home with a conventionsl mortgage based on a new appraisal and pay 401K back within 2-4 months. So I'm only coming out of pocket about $2500 for this transaction: the fees and notes while I renovate. Cash flow on the home should be about 10K per year.
Can someone tell me why a Heloc would be a better route?
Posted on 6/24/19 at 1:16 pm to gpburdell
quote:
The point is that the principal portion of a 401k loan isn't taxed twice. The principal isn't taxed at all assuming you pay the loan back. Taxation doesn't happen till you take a disbursement.
I think the idea is that the pre-tax money that was in the account wasn’t taxed initially when added to the account, while you paid income taxes on the post-tax money that you are using to repay the loan.
It is true that I could take a loan and immediately pay it back with the same loan money and not be taxed. I can’t envision that being a typical scenario.
Posted on 6/24/19 at 5:32 pm to weagle99
quote:
It is true that I could take a loan and immediately pay it back with the same loan money and not be taxed. I can’t envision that being a typical scenario.
What do you mean by taxed? When you take a 401k loan there are no taxes involved (unless you don't pay it back then you'll be penalized and taxed as it will be treated as early distribution).
Whether you use the original loan money or some other funds to pay the loan back is irrelevant. Your overall tax liability isn't increasing due to the 401k loan principal.
There are plenty of sites that I've linked that show the math on this. Feel free to find one that shows otherwise.
Posted on 6/25/19 at 11:19 am to gpburdell
What finally clicked is the pretax money is being spent where post tax would have which zeroes it out. I see.
Still wouldn’t do it though due to opportunity cost.
This post was edited on 6/25/19 at 11:31 am
Popular
Back to top


0





