- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 4 week Tbills went off at 5.96% this week
Posted on 5/11/23 at 7:48 am to I B Freeman
Posted on 5/11/23 at 7:48 am to I B Freeman
Never had done this before but it looked fairly simple. set up an account yesterday on treasury direct, bought $5000 tbills 4 week and set to reinvest 13 times.
so that $5000 at the end of a year when it's put back into my account would have returned 5.96%?
so that $5000 at the end of a year when it's put back into my account would have returned 5.96%?
Posted on 5/11/23 at 7:59 am to coonasstiger
quote:
so that $5000 at the end of a year when it's put back into my account would have returned 5.96%?
no, that rate is only locked in for the first four weeks. Not for the reinvestments.
also, another point of clarification is 5.96% was last weeks auction rate. I don't know if this week will go up or down, but you are not going to get 5.96% exactly.
This post was edited on 5/11/23 at 8:06 am
Posted on 5/11/23 at 8:12 am to bbap
ah ok makes sense, so it will renew each week at whatever the auction rate is, could be higher, could be lower?
not that $5000k is chump changed but I wasnt going to throw a huge amount in there till i understood more about it.
but whatever % it goes at when it buys, i still would have had to do the 13 weeks to get that full percentage for this first 4 week period?
as in if i only did it for 4 weeks then it would have earned less of a %
not that $5000k is chump changed but I wasnt going to throw a huge amount in there till i understood more about it.
but whatever % it goes at when it buys, i still would have had to do the 13 weeks to get that full percentage for this first 4 week period?
as in if i only did it for 4 weeks then it would have earned less of a %
Posted on 5/11/23 at 8:27 am to coonasstiger
quote:
ah ok makes sense, so it will renew each week at whatever the auction rate is, could be higher, could be lower?
not each week, no. your term is 4 weeks so whatever rate you get will be locked in for 4 weeks. in 4 weeks time when the 1st reinvestment takes place, whatever rate comes out of that auction will lock you in for the next 4 weeks, rinse and repeat 13 times.
quote:
but whatever % it goes at when it buys, i still would have had to do the 13 weeks to get that full percentage for this first 4 week period?
I'm not exactly sure what you are asking but regardless if you reinvest or not you are going to get $5,000 x whatever % the auction comes in at X (4/52)...roughly for the first 4 week bill.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:01 am to I B Freeman
quote:Where is this from?
[/img]
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:01 am to NOSHAU
quote:
Where is this from?
TreasuryDirect
Posted on 5/11/23 at 1:31 pm to bbap
Made an account and bought one for a first time.
$500 for 4weeks issue date 05/23
Didn't set it for reinvestment. Want to see how it all works.
$500 for 4weeks issue date 05/23
Didn't set it for reinvestment. Want to see how it all works.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 1:39 pm to SuperSaint
You earn the interest on the withdrawal at the beginning, not on the repayment at the end.
So they will take $495 out of your account, and then in 4 weeks give you $500 back. (not accurate amounts, just an example)
So they will take $495 out of your account, and then in 4 weeks give you $500 back. (not accurate amounts, just an example)
Posted on 5/11/23 at 4:04 pm to Triple Bogey
quote:Which risk? The risk of actually not getting paid? nah
but the risk is real.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 10:42 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Which risk? The risk of actually not getting paid? nah
No way there’s an actual default. Worst case you don’t get your money on the due date. Even then it’s pretty likely the treasury will still pay you interest on the locked up funds.
I think large companies, funds, etc that have heaps running on short term notes just can’t afford to not have liquidity guaranteed on the maturity date. So they park money elsewhere. This gives people who don’t need 100% guaranteed liquidity on the maturity date and a little after better rates on the 4 month t bills.
I bought a good chunk of 4 weeks today. Missed out on the 6% previous auction .
Probably will buy a bunch in the secondary market before the supposed default date.
A bond genius I am not but this seems like an excellent buying opportunity.
Posted on 5/11/23 at 11:05 pm to SaintsTiger
quote:
A bond genius I am not but this seems like an excellent buying opportunity.
It’s like picking up pennies in front of bulldozers.
This post was edited on 5/11/23 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 5/12/23 at 12:14 am to slackster
quote:How? What's the bulldozer going to be? 4 week UST notes not being paid? Please.
It’s like picking up pennies in front of bulldozers.
Posted on 5/12/23 at 6:47 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
How? What's the bulldozer going to be? 4 week UST notes not being paid? Please.
A) it’s a line from When Genius Failed, the book about LTCM, that references incredibly small but very easy to make gains, unless you get his by the steamroller - (I said bulldozer but the quote is steamroller I believe). The bulldozer is all relative.
B) The extra yield on a 4 week instrument is immaterial without very large purchases. I personally am avoiding it for any clients because the potential headache of a couple days of missing liquidity isn’t worth the “pennies” you’re getting vs a 13-week bill. You’re taking about less that $6 per $10,000 extra over the course of the month.
This post was edited on 5/12/23 at 6:52 am
Posted on 5/12/23 at 8:11 am to slackster
quote:
I personally am avoiding it for any clients because the potential headache of a couple days of missing liquidity isn’t worth the “pennies” you’re getting vs a 13-week bill. You’re taking about less that $6 per $10,000 extra over the course of the month.
So what's the option you are offering clients?
Posted on 5/12/23 at 8:19 am to kengel2
quote:
So what's the option you are offering clients?
He said 13 week Tbills.
Posted on 5/12/23 at 8:30 am to SaintsTiger
quote:
He said 13 week Tbills.
Ya, I get it now, just doing the 13 week bills instead of 4 week bills.
Posted on 5/12/23 at 8:47 am to coonasstiger
quote:
set up an account yesterday on treasury direct
Fyi, you can do this at Fidelity or any of the major brokerage including auto-roll. You only need a treasury direct account for I/EE bonds. Also buying on the brokerages, allows you to sell it before maturity if the need arises. Can't do that at treasury direct.
Posted on 5/12/23 at 9:12 am to gpburdell
That is true. There will be some charges at the brokers that you will not incur at TD and of course there is the risk of the broker's liquidity---nothing really but given SVB some may have concerns.
Posted on 5/12/23 at 9:42 am to slackster
quote:It's a well-worn phrase in investing, a reference to people not understanding when they are short volatility. I fully understand.
A) it’s a line from When Genius Failed, the book about LTCM, that references incredibly small but very easy to make gains, unless you get his by the steamroller - (I said bulldozer but the quote is steamroller I believe). The bulldozer is all relative.
quote:It might be a pain in the arse, yes, but the adage you invoked captures a different sentiment.
B) The extra yield on a 4 week instrument is immaterial without very large purchases. I personally am avoiding it for any clients because the potential headache of a couple days of missing liquidity isn’t worth the “pennies” you’re getting vs a 13-week bill. You’re taking about less that $6 per $10,000 extra over the course of the month
Posted on 5/12/23 at 9:46 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
might be a pain in the arse, yes, but the adage you invoked captures a different sentiment.
Fair enough.
Popular
Back to top


2



