- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
You could plug almost any QB into lineup
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:31 am
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:31 am
It seems like You could plug almost any QB into lineup and get the same results. While that is admittedly a broad generalization it has credibility.
Our offense is QB-shy. The coaching, scheme etc seem to have marginalized the position.
Our offense is QB-shy. The coaching, scheme etc seem to have marginalized the position.
11
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:40 am to JohnnyU
Almost like the expectation is for the defense to win the game; the offense is more an afterthought. Last year Special Teams was part of that same victory equation; the offense was taken out of it in and after the first Alabama game.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:41 am to JohnnyU
quote:
Our offense is QB-shy. The coaching, scheme etc seem to have marginalized the position.
Man this is getting tiresome. Re-freakin-tarded.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:42 am to JohnnyU
quote:
It seems like You could plug almost any QB into lineup and get the same results. While that is admittedly a broad generalization it has credibility.
Our offense is QB-shy. The coaching, scheme etc seem to have marginalized the position.
Almost as though they are trying to ensure that no one player is indispensable and still try to be competitive on a national scale!!!
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:44 am to PeaRidgeWatash
quote:
PeaRidgeWatash
quote:It just won't stop.
Man this is getting tiresome. Re-freakin-tarded.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:45 am to JohnnyU
You are correct to an extent. LSU wants to grind it out on offense and play great defense. It has proven to be a great formula for winning.
Mett has played 4 games and IMO has played great for what he has been asked to do. Anyone who expected him to come in and look like a heisman contender in his first 4 games is just retarded.
He needs to improve on a few things but that should come with experience.
Mett has played 4 games and IMO has played great for what he has been asked to do. Anyone who expected him to come in and look like a heisman contender in his first 4 games is just retarded.
He needs to improve on a few things but that should come with experience.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:49 am to JohnnyU
How quickly we forget last year. And the year before that. And the year before that. And the year before that.
For the love of God people. STFU about the QB position. We have a stud there now, let him at least get half a season of starts before you pretend he is equivalent to last year's cluster.
For the love of God people. STFU about the QB position. We have a stud there now, let him at least get half a season of starts before you pretend he is equivalent to last year's cluster.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:51 am to JohnnyU
quote:
It seems like You could plug almost any QB into lineup and get the same results. While that is admittedly a broad generalization it has credibility.
Good God man, you are ridculously stupid.
Besides the fumbles, I thought Mett was borderline outstanding. You can fix fumbles...it's hard to fix the ability to hit an open target. Mett hit his targets. Besides drops, Mett was almost perfect passing the ball the first half. With the roll-outs and drops the second half, he stats didn't look good, but he damn sure hit his receivers!
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:55 am to stho381
quote:
For the love of God people. STFU about the QB position. We have a stud there now, let him at least get half a season of starts before you pretend he is equivalent to last year's cluster.
I love hearing people act like they're intelligent or just generally holier-than-thou when responding to this subject.
The stud we have has us ranked 96th in America is passing offense IIRC.
In other words, perhaps it's not the talent at the position, but the heavy-handed limitations this offense puts on anyone who plays said position.
If Mett is a stud, and he's hovered at around 70% completion and we're STILL in the 90's, then talent isn't the issue. It's scheme, Lynn Brollins.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 6:59 am to tiger11
quote:
Good God man, you are ridculously stupid.
Besides the fumbles, I thought Mett was borderline outstanding. You can fix fumbles...it's hard to fix the ability to hit an open target. Mett hit his targets. Besides drops, Mett was almost perfect passing the ball the first half. With the roll-outs and drops the second half, he stats didn't look good, but he damn sure hit his receivers!
Really don't believe the OP is Calling out the QB Or saying he is equal to last year. I believe he is calling out the offensive scheme in which I believe is pretty bad. I understand people will say defense has worked good for us, look at our record, but why does the defense have to bust their arse for us to win. It would be good for the offense to pull some weight.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 7:04 am to GFunk
the mans got a very accurate and strong arm. we just got to fill in the rest of the equation ie OL protection and receiver catching the ball and we can be very successful. Unfortunately this is not as simple as it sounds. Injuries on OL are great effecting our play, as well as not having a consistently open go to receiver. where is this years reuben randle?
Posted on 9/24/12 at 7:06 am to Jdawgz
quote:
Really don't believe the OP is Calling out the QB Or saying he is equal to last year. I believe he is calling out the offensive scheme in which I believe is pretty bad. I understand people will say defense has worked good for us, look at our record, but why does the defense have to bust their arse for us to win. It would be good for the offense to pull some weight.
True, and if all our receivers keep dropping balls, it doesn't matter who's in there
Though, I will say, I disagree. I think the coaches seemed much more willing to throw on any down and threw on first down quite a bit.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 7:12 am to JohnnyU
oh great, another thread where a brilliant offensive minded genious wants us to play NCAA 2013 offensive football..
good god this shite will never stop
good god this shite will never stop
Posted on 9/24/12 at 7:32 am to JohnnyU
Good point. I agree. We could stick Drew Brees back there and it wouldnt net us any more passing plays because Les &Co. refuse to let a QB be a playmaker until he's forced to on 3rd and long. Any passes thrown before third down seem to only be toward the sideline rather than downfield. This inflates any qb's numbers because of all the easy short throws.
Then you get little retards that come on TD and troll anyone with a realistic view and say "well look at this completion %"
theyre the same trolls saying "all is ok, we won the game"
Then you get little retards that come on TD and troll anyone with a realistic view and say "well look at this completion %"
theyre the same trolls saying "all is ok, we won the game"
Posted on 9/24/12 at 7:35 am to Mr. Hangover
the passing scheme was fine people. The blocking sucked and the receivers dropped too many passes. OB should have caught that long pass. It was a beautiful throw and well timed play call. The scheme didn't fumble the ball twice. And the scheme didn't drop any passes.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 8:01 am to JohnnyU
There were 4 or 5 dropped passes, and not very much pass blocking... Wtf would you have Mett do?? Throw the pass, then run down field and catch it??? Mett has a cannon, and throws well, WR have to man up and catch the ball.Posted on 9/24/12 at 8:10 am to lake chuck fan
Did any of you happen to see Matt Barkley against Stanford. That is a great example of how a horrible offensive line can make a Heisman calibur QB look like a hapless school child. Enough said!
Posted on 9/24/12 at 8:12 am to lake chuck fan
obj has not played well so far. i'm thinking he has to much to do and needs to focus solely on being a no. 1 wr. we took kickoff from him and I'm thinking we need a different punt returner. don't know who that would be but not landry. he needs to focus on wr duties also.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 8:12 am to JohnnyU
quote:
It seems like You could plug almost any QB into lineup and get the same results.
no way. against cupcakes maybe but to beat the best teams on our schedule the qb position is one of the most important, if not most important on the field.
Posted on 9/24/12 at 8:13 am to PinevilleTiger
quote:
Did any of you happen to see Matt Barkley against Stanford
It is just amazing how quiet the media is about his terrible performances
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News