Started By
Message

re: Would we be better with Hilliard and Copeland at fullback

Posted on 10/15/12 at 10:08 am to
Posted by lsutigertalk
At Death Valley
Member since Apr 2004
5472 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 10:08 am to
First off, I will agree with what someone said, he is a half back, not a full back.

But I got a chance to see Hill and Hilliard in the Semi Final game Patterson vs Redemptorist a few years back. And I said it then and will say it now, I would love to see us have them both on the field at the same time. That being said, Copeland is the best full back in the nation and in my opinion the heart of our offense. A lot of the success we have had in our running game is because of Copeland, so why try and take him off the field when he is by far the best man for the job?
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30359 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 12:55 pm to
Hilliard ain't no fullback.
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
25791 posts
Posted on 10/15/12 at 1:02 pm to
Copland doesn't need a break lol
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram