Started By
Message

re: Why the lack of snaps for Harold Perkins?

Posted on 11/29/22 at 8:04 am to
Posted by Taurus
Loozianna
Member since Feb 2015
4955 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Why the lack of snaps for Harold Perkins?


Heisman worthy????

Oh, he was useless.
Posted by Jamey21
Katy, Texas
Member since Jul 2019
747 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 9:23 am to
quote:

I love how all of a sudden everyone knows more about defense than our defensive coordinator who up until the A&M game everyone was praising. At the end of the day, players need to make plays and LSU didn't


Thank you!! Exactly

These coaches see these kids on the field everyday. They know who should be playing and WHY!

I remember at the start of the season everyone bitching about Josh Williams starting. They were complaining " why do we have a Walk on starting??

Now you know why jackazzes? Coaches want to win games a lot more then we do. They jobs depend on it.

Stay in your lane!
Posted by beautigers65
Member since Oct 2015
56 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 12:13 pm to
Perkins needs to play the edge 100% of the time with a college scheme that let's him rush the passer like Lawrence Taylor / Von Miller. Pressure and disruption on the quarterback is way more valuable than any linebacker play (coverage or run support) that he could provide from off the line of scrimmage. For a running quarterback, I would say the spy position would count as quarterback disruption, so that is fine.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
58864 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

They should put him spy and stop the damn running back then. Use him to stop the run not just the pass. Not sure why they didn't use him like that. Wouldn't of hurt to try.


Posted by Switek
Member since Nov 2022
128 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 12:29 pm to
This is the only excuse
Posted by Switek
Member since Nov 2022
128 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 12:32 pm to
Baskerville has been good all year except Saturday
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
58864 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Perkins needs to play the edge 100% of the time with a college scheme that let's him rush the passer like Lawrence Taylor / Von Miller. Pressure and disruption on the quarterback is way more valuable than any linebacker play (coverage or run support) that he could provide from off the line of scrimmage. For a running quarterback, I would say the spy position would count as quarterback disruption, so that is fine.





Almost none of y’all (the simple ones who think like this) know anything about football, but exactly how big do y’all think 18-year-old Harold Perkins is right now?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
420868 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 12:34 pm to
Probably 220 or so.

Did you see what he did at edge playing whatever weight he was playing this year?

I'll copy and paste something I posted earlier on the RB:

quote:

His value on the edge will always be greater than his value playing LB. That's the problem with your math.

Edge is a much more valuable position and presents many more opportunities to make big plays. Whatever alleged schematic value in moving him around almost assuredly isn't worth the loss in value-production by playing him at an inferior position (value-wise) that he plays much less well.

Also, any time spent working on developing at LB will take away from time developing him at edge.

I don't get the EV calculation on this.
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
22937 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 12:45 pm to
Was it a lack of snaps or ineffectiveness? How many snaps did he get compared to previous games?

A&M threw the ball less than 20 times. Rarely in third and long where Perkins can pin his ears back and get after the QB. I also noticed that when LSU kept their three linebacker personnel instead of going to nickel, A&M would motion out the receiver/TE, and Perkins was forced to go out with him, taking him out of the play or creating a mismatch.

For Perkins to be effective, LSU needed to force more obvious passing situations by stopping the run. Even when A&M passed, it was all quick out of the QBs hands. LSU's defensive failures are all tied to being unable to stop the run consistently.

LSU has been effective at stopping the run against teams with much better run game resumes than Texas A&M. I think the team thought that A&M was ready to roll over and didn't bring their best effort. I also think you are dealing with some fatigue on that side of the ball due to lack of depth.
Posted by beautigers65
Member since Oct 2015
56 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 12:48 pm to
He is listed as 6'2 220 and that is big enough to rush the passer in college when you have elite get-off, quickness, speed and bend. And if one knows anything about football, one knows that disrupting the quarterback is worth much more than anything else on defense. Next is an elite shut down corner. An off the ball linebacker is last.
Posted by geauxfortwo
Livin the dream
Member since Jan 2018
1886 posts
Posted on 11/29/22 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Why the lack of snaps for Harold Perkins?


Do people actually want an answer or is this just the new hip thing to say?

Most of the comments let you know that 99% of the rant has no idea about scheme or defenses
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram