Started By
Message

re: Who is representing LSU at the hearing tomorrow?

Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:48 pm to
Posted by lgtiger
LA
Member since May 2005
1552 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:48 pm to
Posted by Sailor Sam
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Feb 2017
762 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:50 pm to
We need a CRIMINAL attorney.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16252 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Which is exactly what Stanky and the SEC gestapo in Birmingham want. They want to ram this thing through before we have a chance to stop it.


If Kiffin etc. wanted to respond it could have been filed. There is a reason no one has enrolled and nothing has been filed. Not saying they won’t respond but this is by choice.
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
13051 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Service is required


What does that mean?
Posted by LVag1997
Member since Jun 2021
1319 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:13 pm to
You can't name someone in a lawsuit without serving them, and then go to court. Court would be delayed until all parties were served.

Nobody in this case is diificult to find, so my assumption is service was provided. It isn't difficult in this case for service to be made.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:17 pm
Posted by One72
Member since Jul 2022
1568 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:15 pm to
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer because this is all so pathetic.

Posted by pitchandcatch27
Huntsville,AL
Member since Jul 2018
4593 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:17 pm to
The hearing is Thursday I thought on the federal side?
Posted by St8lyOaks
Member since Dec 2015
462 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:19 pm to
Hearing is tomorrow (Wednesday) in federal court in Alabama. SEC meeting to supposedly expel LSU is Thursday.
Posted by CecildaDiesel
Member since Jun 2020
350 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

James Williams is on the summons, but that’s most likely because he is on the BoS. He’s be a good choice to represent the school though.


Yea he’s on the board. Half the BOS are lawyers- Williams, carmouche, rico, and others
Posted by dinner roll
buttery goodness
Member since Feb 2006
6640 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

This hearing is for a TRO to prevent LSU from “interfering” with the Thursday SEC meeting to supposedly expel us. Interfering here presumably means LSU seeking an injunction in state court.


The SEC will have to show that LSU is actually going to (or is likely to) do something that it doesn’t have the right to do. The SEC carries the burden to prove that it’s entitled to an injunction. Saying that there’s a conceptual possibility isn’t enough. What do they plan to show the court on this?
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 8:35 pm
Posted by St8lyOaks
Member since Dec 2015
462 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 8:33 pm to
No idea. They probably have nothing. Murrill said in her interview with Moscona that LSU wasn’t trying to stop the Thursday SEC meeting which means the SEC’s amended filing is just bluster.
Posted by Curtis Lowe
Member since Dec 2019
1781 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:02 pm to
Damn, the Attys for the SEC are so bright that they have Stankey Sankey admitting to collusion in his sworn affidavit.
Posted by TigerWatch
Metairie
Member since Feb 2004
3468 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:06 pm to
It’s in federal court. Does a lawyer need to be licensed in Alabama to practice in federal court?
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32372 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:08 pm to
Gordon, Morris Bart, Callahan, and the other Billboard shysters couldn’t find the courthouse with a GPS and written directions. They all finished at the bottom of their law school classes and minored in marketing.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram