Started By
Message

re: When did our fanbase become so soft?

Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:17 pm to
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30961 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

I wish LSU had a fanbase that was as rabid as Alabama or Georgia where 1 loss means the season was a failure. Those are fanbases that don’t tolerate anything less than what Saban built and then Kirby.


LSU donors bought out Orgeron and Kelly. They didn’t tolerate mediocrity.

Saban, and presumably Kirby, are generational coaches. Alabama was stuck in neutral for the better part of 25 years after Bear, and Georgia even longer post-Dooley. Know your history. It doesn’t matter what you tolerate as a fan.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
54430 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

And Bama fans wanted DeBoer fired and most still do. What’s your point?

I know after Indiana beat them 38-3 nobody wanted him back. And they still don’t support him. The only thing giving him a little leeway right now is the freshman QB giving the appearance of hope for the future

Only psychos wanted him fired after the first season.

If Kiffin makes it to playoffs next year only to get torched, I’d start to get worried.

Also of course you didn’t mention my point about Smart
Posted by jgriffith
Paradise Valley, Arizona
Member since Sep 2005
7154 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:23 pm to
You meant to ask when did our program become so soft.
Posted by Lcguy
Member since Jan 2020
2417 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:25 pm to
I question if any of these people are fans or just posers.
Posted by Andrew82
Member since Nov 2026
22 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

LSU donors bought out Orgeron and Kelly. They didn’t tolerate mediocrity


Paying what it took to get Mulkey is an example of that.

Buying out Orgeron to get a better coach wirh a better resume in Kelly I agree was a move to get better. A move to not tolerate mediocrity’s.

Buying out Kelly to get a guy with a worse resume and more money was simply the swamp wasting money. It’s a faux “see we tried” moment. “We threw money” at the problem,

And keeping McMahon for as long as LSU did is basically saying they don’t care about LSU basketball.

Getting the football equivalent of Mulkey would have been a not tolerating mediocrity move. LSU didn’t do that. Trying something different (such as putting the money on the field and less in the coaching staff) was something they could have tried to get out of the mediocrity. They didn’t try that either. The swamp hired a retread that’s been fired a couple times
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
11467 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

Sorry OP, your soft bigotry of low expectations isn’t gonna rub off on me. And hopefully it doesn’t for the real fans.


Oh shut up for frick sake. People like you are part of the problem
Posted by semjase
New Smyrna Beach FL
Member since May 2014
16905 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

They post here anonymously because their friends or family would laugh them out the room.
100% of the board posts here anonymously.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30961 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:48 pm to
Then I shall ask:

How much money did you pony up for a buyout for Kelly or McMahon? Who was your choice to replace Kelly?
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
54430 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:51 pm to
If Mulkey is his benchmark the only coach is Kirby and even he isn’t as qualified as Mulkey
This post was edited on 11/8/26 at 10:53 pm
Posted by Andrew82
Member since Nov 2026
22 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:57 pm to
No it’s not. Go spend way less money, and go find the next Cignetti. At the very least you’ll be setting yourself up to have a much higher paid roster if you aren’t spending so much on the staff. Even Hester and Flynn think it’s a joke that LSU has 80 coaches. Drain the fn swamp.

LSU did the worst thing they could have done. They paid a ton of money stay in the exact same place. They didn’t try to do anything different.

And I think a Mulkey comp would be getting Urban.
Posted by Judgesmails04
Member since Aug 2026
325 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 10:59 pm to
I don’t know but there is definitely a bunch of pussies on this board.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
54430 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

Go spend way less money, and go find the next Cignetti


shite why don’t we just try to find the next Saban?

quote:

And I think a Mulkey comp would be getting Urban.

Holy shite
Posted by Andrew82
Member since Nov 2026
22 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 11:19 pm to
You don’t think Urban Meyer is a championship level coach? I’ve heard the praise and respect he has for Tiger Stadium.

I’d have much rather spent the money to get him, or spent a tiny amount and tried to find the smartest undiscovered coach, than just hire another retread but pay him like he’s the top in the game.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
54430 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 11:22 pm to
Urban hasn’t coached college football in 8 years

But yeah he’d definitely be better than Kiffin

Your second option is profoundly high risk

But yeah that’s definitely a better idea than hiring Kiffin
This post was edited on 11/8/26 at 11:24 pm
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
30744 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 11:23 pm to
Bama fans aren’t happy with their coach either. Just because you go over to the SECr and read a handful of posts from Bama posters laughing at LSU after another loss to them in BR….understand this. They know they can’t run the ball and the entire culture is their team is softer than it was with Saban

Don’t be fooled because they’re gloating today. I promise, they’re terrified about not being able to run the football
Posted by reauxl tigers
Tiger Woods Fan
Member since Aug 2014
10555 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 11:37 pm to
About 2013
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
11551 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 11:38 pm to
I think he'll get it turned around, but seeing other teams turn it around w/ new coaches and rosters that cost a whole lot less, and supposedly w/ a lot less talent, has got a lot of us wondering what the frick is going on. Not too hard to understand the frustration.

This team has shown repeatedly they cannot beat good teams. We all thought the prior two games were definite signs that everything was improving. It was fools gold, and that's probably the biggest drag of all of this; reality. The team is just average.
Posted by Mackinsar
Member since Dec 2025
68 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 11:43 pm to
Caring about winning doesn’t make you soft, and it doesn’t make you weak. Caring about winning makes you more competitive and ultimately better. Happily tolerating failure does not.

There are some players on the LSU Football team that I wish cared more about winning.

Headline in today’s The Athletic:

“LSU isn’t paying Lane Kiffin $13M a year to come close and lose big games”

That’s definitely not what we are paying him for, but that is definitely what he is doing. And it needs to stop.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
54430 posts
Posted on 11/8/26 at 11:55 pm to
How many times you gonna post that headline

Look we all care about winning. Everyone here(except the trolls) wants championships.

But I’m not giving up on LSU and Kiffin 9 games into his first season. There have been multiple posts of people giving up season tickets, not supporting the program, etc. That’s pretty damn soft

The salary stuff doesn’t mean much to me and the stuff the media says about Kiffin means absolutely zilch to me.
This post was edited on 11/9/26 at 12:07 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram