- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the true "rank" of LSU's offense?
Posted on 1/13/13 at 7:44 pm to Fat Bastard
Posted on 1/13/13 at 7:44 pm to Fat Bastard
Not buying it Fat Bastard? 
1
Posted on 1/13/13 at 7:51 pm to lsuexpert57
quote:
But using those numbers is a little lazy on your part.
Lazy? I said it's a guideline, and a useful one. For instance in the clubs NC years we finished 31 and 26. Over last 5 years we've finished 55, 112, 86, 86 and 85. Obviously the club has won a lot of games, and a CC...but you don't see a correlation between a much better O and taking that final step of an NC?
Posted on 1/13/13 at 7:58 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
Not buying it Fat Bastard?
hell no.
you are correct with more offense we could have been hoisting back to back crystal.
oh well.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:01 pm to lsuexpert57
quote:Depends on the agenda.
What is the true "rank" of LSU's offense?
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:12 pm to Mayhawman
quote:
Depends on the agenda.
There's really nothing wrong with LSU's philosophy, tactically though, it's a mess. They rely way too much on winning one-on-one match-ups and don't employ enough scheme to create advantages for playmakers.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:24 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
2nd hf we did ok against Georgia but in 8 qtrs we scored 9 PTA against Bama. With a better offense( ranked b/w 30th and 60th) we may be the 2 time defending champs right now.
No doubt.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I watched LSU play Townson and this offense was just bad. Early in the year, first few games the running game was clicking but it went downhill from there, particularly after the competition developed a pulse.
But then we watched them play Bama in Nov. and they looked great. So can turn it on occasionally??
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:28 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
this so called EXPERT has posted some real DELUSIONAL BS lately.
Oh yeah, you are the KING of reality eh fat arse?
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:31 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
Lazy? I said it's a guideline, and a useful one. For instance in the clubs NC years we finished 31 and 26. Over last 5 years we've finished 55, 112, 86, 86 and 85. Obviously the club has won a lot of games, and a CC...but you don't see a correlation between a much better O and taking that final step of an NC?
Of course I do, and the point of this thread is not me saying we have been good or efficient on offense. Simply that many people on here are trying to make things seem worse than they are by overweighting those very statistics.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:32 pm to lsuexpert57
quote:
But then we watched them play Bama in Nov. and they looked great. So can turn it on occasionally??
We all saw the anomaly that was the Bama game, and know it can be done. Except with the game on the line..apparently.
LSU offense relies on superior talent beating lesser competition and it doesn't always work. We all saw that LSU can run an effective offense for one game though.
You can't claim talent is the problem. It's a deplorable scheme that doesn't do anything to help individual players in their matchups.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:35 pm to lsuexpert57
quote:
What is the true "rank" of LSU's offense?
Just rank.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:38 pm to lsuexpert57
quote:
Oh yeah, you are the KING of reality eh fat arse?
I've probably forgotten more football x's and o's than you will ever learn. You make asinine post after asinine post here showing you do not know jack shite. keep making yourself look dumb.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:39 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
quote:
For instance in the clubs NC years we finished 31 and 26. Over last 5 years we've finished 55, 112, 86, 86 and 85. Obviously the club has won a lot of games, and a CC...but you don't see a correlation between a much better O and taking that final step of an NC?
I know what I see and have seen for quite some time now.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:42 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
There's really nothing wrong with LSU's philosophy, tactically though, it's a mess. They rely way too much on winning one-on-one match-ups and don't employ enough scheme to create advantages for playmakers.
I tend to agree with your assessment. But it is hard to tell. When I watch the replays, the designs of the plays seem ok. We have the same route trees I see other teams run. I see us run basically the same plays that Bama is running.
Many, many times this year it appeared that the proper play was called in regards to what the defense was giving, but the plays always seemed to go awry. Missed blocks, dropped passes, misreads by both QB and recievers, bad throws and hesitancy from Mett...so I can see what CLM is talking about when he blames it on execution.
So if it IS mainly an execution issue, then who gets most of the blame? Are the coaches not coaching well enough, or are the players just not doing as they are taught? Pretty impossible to tell from where I sit.
Doesn't really matter who is to blame though, ultimately if your team fails to execute enough, it is always the COACH who is fired eventually. And then the mouth breathers can celebrate and say "I told you so"!
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:44 pm to lsuexpert57
quote:
Simply that many people on here are trying to make things seem worse than they are by overweighting those very statistics.
Well, you have your opinion and I am not gonna try any more to convince you of anything. If you can't see the offense for what it is, not sure no amount of reality will change your mind.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:47 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
I've probably forgotten more football x's and o's than you will ever learn.
You might know more than some people fat boy, but you don't know more than me. You need to go check out the buffet and let us "experts" hash things out. And clean the twinkie crumbs off your keyboard while you are at it.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:48 pm to lsuexpert57
quote:
I tend to agree with your assessment. But it is hard to tell. When I watch the replays, the designs of the plays seem ok. We have the same route trees I see other teams run. I see us run basically the same plays that Bama is running.
Are you watching coaching film? You rarely get to see the routes of each receiver on a broadcast.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:49 pm to dbt_Geaux_Tigers_196
Les is the bes,sabis does pretty good with the countless 5 stars that espn recruits for him,if he would have had to do his own recruiting he would be a mac conference coach!
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:53 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
Are you watching coaching film? You rarely get to see the routes of each receiver on a broadcast.
Actually the CST replays are the ones I use to critique and they do a pretty good job of using a wide angle so that you often get a great look at both the full secondary and the routes run against it. As long as I can see both safeties at the snap I'm happy I'm seeing an accurate picture of the play.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 8:53 pm to timm6971463
quote:
timm6971463
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News