- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What about Lou Holtz hitting the nail on the head!
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:13 pm
Said JJ would be the key with the option
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:15 pm to Abe
Also implied the Reid INT was an obvious blown call.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:15 pm to Abe
Lou Holtz also said that the only thing we learned was that LSU's kicker is better than Bama's. I want Granny Holtz to tell me how many times his kicker made 4 field goals of 44, 49, 50, and 52 yards in a game? LSU kicked chip shot field goals, even shorter than an extra point. Bama couldn't break into LSU's red zone.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:18 pm to Abe
- "JJ with the option is nessecary."
- "Boring game"
- "Reid interception was a clear reception by receiver."
I guess hitting one nail with three swings of a hammer isn't bad.
Just don't hit any fingers.
- "Boring game"
- "Reid interception was a clear reception by receiver."
I guess hitting one nail with three swings of a hammer isn't bad.
Just don't hit any fingers.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:31 pm to Abe
I'm starting to really like the old dude, but mainly for harmless entertainment on those Final Verdict segments.
Still, it's not hard even for Dr Lou to figure out:
If Bama puts 8 in the box against Lee/RB/TE/FB/OL, it's technically 8-on-8 because Lee is not a running threat.
If Bama puts 8 on JJ/RB/TE/FB/OL, we have 9 guys against their eight.
Still, it's not hard even for Dr Lou to figure out:
If Bama puts 8 in the box against Lee/RB/TE/FB/OL, it's technically 8-on-8 because Lee is not a running threat.
If Bama puts 8 on JJ/RB/TE/FB/OL, we have 9 guys against their eight.
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:34 pm to Stagg8
quote:
Also implied the Reid INT was an obvious blown call.
no he flat out said that it was not an int. He was mad because once again he was wrong about the prediction.
Here is what I said FWIW:
re: If JJ is going to play (Posted on 10/23/11 at 9:46 a.m. to ShortyRob)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JJ will beat Bama. He has a 160 Qb rating against them with zero turn overs over the last 2 seasons. He had them beat in 09 and beat them in 10. Les has been holding him back IMO.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"if there's a way to steal a possession, i'm certainly going to invest in that thought". Les Miles January 2008
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:36 pm to LSUFreek
quote:
If Bama puts 8 in the box against Lee/RB/TE/FB/OL, it's technically 8-on-8 because Lee is not a running threat.
But Bama didn't have to put 8 in the box to stop our run. That's why Lee couldn't hit any passes on Bama. In our "I formation" they had corners pressing, and funneling our wr's to their safeties to play over the top. Basically they had both wideouts double covered. Meanwhile, the other 7 guys could flat out stuff our running game. Very impressive.
Meanwhile, LSU's corners were so much better than Bama's wr's that we could play them straight up man to man and commit 8 or 9 to stop Bama's running game, which we were decent at doing, well better than anybody else this year.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News