- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WE don't need to see a "vertical passing game"
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:53 pm to omegaman66
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:53 pm to omegaman66
Well since you put it that way...
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:56 pm to ViaCavour
Glad you succumbed to reason... oh wait that was sarcasm wasn't it!
Posted on 9/2/12 at 12:58 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
Why would we unload our playbook on North Texas,
Oh lol
Posted on 9/2/12 at 1:02 pm to omegaman66
Serious question here-
did it seem like NT's plan was to hit the QB every chance they could?
I mean, it was generally understood we would try to work on the passing game; this was common knowledge.
We ran for over 300 yds, and yet they weren't biting on play-action. They were sure calling a lot of blitzes too.
It just seemed like that was their goal- not to win, or to try to withstand our offense; but to put a lick on our QB.
did it seem like NT's plan was to hit the QB every chance they could?
I mean, it was generally understood we would try to work on the passing game; this was common knowledge.
We ran for over 300 yds, and yet they weren't biting on play-action. They were sure calling a lot of blitzes too.
It just seemed like that was their goal- not to win, or to try to withstand our offense; but to put a lick on our QB.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 1:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we didn't look like OU or anything, but we didn't look good last night, overall. our offense was a lot like the 2010 offense, where we had huge outlier plays, a bunch of short rushing plays, and nothing else
Your a moron, negatiger dude....
2010 offense averaged less than 300 yard per game all season with a season high 31 pt game v aubbie....
Yesterday we had 500 yards of offense and scored 41...
Do you see how the difference here? Basically, the production yesterday was nothing like 2010
Posted on 9/2/12 at 1:34 pm to CajunFootball
quote:
did it seem like NT's plan was to hit the QB every chance they could?
quote:what I meant is- I'm sure they knew they were gonna get stomped this game, as they did. It seemed like the defensive goal was to hit our qb; as in "LSU will score, and we will lose, but take every opportunity to hit their QB. Don't hold up on play-action, don't pull up if it seems he might be going into motion and you will be late; tag the LSU QB every chance you get".
Maybe someone paid them off?
It just seemed... odd, how much they were blitzing a team that was crushing them on the ground. They never seemed to "respect the run", as such.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they played Michigan
we played North Texas
That Michigan team was as outmanned as N. Texas. UM will lose 4-5 games this year.
This post was edited on 9/2/12 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 9/2/12 at 1:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they played Michigan we played North Texas
North Texas could probably give Michigan a pretty good game.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 1:52 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
threw 1 but it was pass interference...he should get plenty of work vs. Towson and Idaho
Don't fool yourself, he be practicing hand-offs
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:10 pm to tiggah1981
quote:
North Texas could probably give Michigan a pretty good game.
You laugh, but I really think they could. Michigan was replacing a million starters, and their best RB wasn't playing.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:15 pm to slackster
slackster
- One of the most sensible posts i've seen all day
- One of the most sensible posts i've seen all day
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
after 1/9/12 i can never guaranteed LSU will be up for a game, and neither can you
wow, don't forget tn05, olmiss09, etc, etc.
slo, your saban love is showing.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
these are games where our team is supposed to work out kinks in the areas where we suck, like, the deep passing game
We ran screens, slants, outs and fades. A bullet over the middle on a deep seam
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:33 pm to dreaux
It was also mets first game. He needs to learn how to run the whole offense. There is alot of running plays in the offense.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:33 pm to slackster
What you are saying is false. We do need a vertical passing game. There will be times (though it may not be often) when we will need to complete some passes down the field. It may be 3rd and long or it may be when teams are stacking the box against us. The threat of being able to throw the ball down the field also keeps the other team honest. It opens up the running game.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:38 pm to peopleschamp
quote:
The threat of being able to throw the ball down the field also keeps the other team honest. It opens up the running game.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:44 pm to peopleschamp
quote:
The threat of being able to throw the ball down the field also keeps the other team honest. It opens up the running game.
Some people just don't understand how being effective in one aspect is beneficial to the other and vice versa. Like I said in a previous post, while the wr screens took advantage of the large cushions, they did little to stop NT from playing with 8 men in the box.
Posted on 9/2/12 at 8:49 pm to ViaCavour
Mett was taking shots. Rbs and o line were blowing blocking assignments. So you have 2 options...risk getting mett blown up again or get conservative. I will go with getting conservative in a game we can't lose and shoring up the pass protection issues in practice.
Back to top


1




