- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Video Inside Shady's Before Fight on Ch. 8 (w/Links)UPDATED
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:04 am to CptBengal
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:04 am to CptBengal
quote:
you have seen the medical report?
do you have a link to it?
Joe Schad from ESPN has reported this was told to him by the BRPD.
His reporting carries more weight than your opinion.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:05 am to CptBengal
quote:
you have seen the medical report?
do you have a link to it?
Joe Schad from ESPN has reported this was told to him by the BRPD.
His reporting carries more weight than your opinion.
I'm assuming you mean the same BRPD that stated publicly that the 4 were treated for minor injuries and released within a couple hours. They don't just let you walk a few hours after sustaining a skull fracture and significant concussion.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:05 am to Choctaw
quote:
thanks for avoiding my question.
i answered your question....got a quote from the Shady's employee's statement yet?
or are you just another hypocritical fool?
YOUR agenda is showing.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:06 am to CptBengal
quote:
If yall are so intellectually dishonest to discount part of the man's statement because it doesn't fit with your narrative...that's just pathetic.
I honestly expected better from you. I now know better.
Enjoy your day.
Yet YOU'RE completely ignoring the part of the statement that doesn't support YOUR view of the situation. Ain't that a kick in the head.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:07 am to CptBengal
quote:
no, I would be happy for him as it means he didn't do it.
you and the other "superfans" were the only ones claiming I hated JJ you fricking troll.
because you seem to be hardlegging for the lying, theiving, woman beater while throwing the LSU player who's never been in trouble before completely under the bus. seems a little odd
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:07 am to LSUdm21
quote:
Yet YOU'RE completely ignoring the part of the statement that doesn't support YOUR view of the situation
no i'm not.
The man said he didn't see JJ in the fight, but admits he couldn't say WHETHER JEFFERSON WAS INVOLVED OR NOT.
His qualifying statement destroys his first comment.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:07 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
Law is all about percentages and chances. Criminal law requires those percentages to be pretty high to convict. Placing Jefferson away from the fight, even in a limited time frame reduced the chances of a conviction.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:07 am to CptBengal
quote:
If yall are so intellectually dishonest to discount part of the man's statement because it doesn't fit with your narrative...that's just pathetic.
I honestly expected better from you. I now know better
I'm not being intellectually dishonest. Read what I said carefully.
The employees statement doesn't completely exonerate Jefferson but it does place him away from the fight for a period of time while the fight is occurring.
In a criminal law setting, this is a pretty important piece of evidence because the State has to prove behind a reasonable doubt that Jefferson is guilty.
Is it possible that the employee just missed the time when Jefferson kicked somebody? Yes.
But being that this fight most likely didn't last very long and we can place Jefferson away from the fight for some time period, the State's burden gets harder and harder.
Lowery is going to have a lot of problems as a witness given his history and what has transpired since the fight. I called him toxic earlier this week and I still stand by that. The DA may not even put him on the stand because of how he'll come off to a jury.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:08 am to CptBengal
quote:
i answered your question....got a quote from the Shady's employee's statement yet?
or are you just another hypocritical fool?
antonio answered it for me. i'll take his statement over anything you say since he actually knows what the frick he's talking about
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:08 am to L S Usetheforce
I'm sorry, but if I were sitting on a jury I surely wouldn't be able to make a sound decision about what the kicker was wearing after watching these videos, and I obviously couldn't identify him.
I do have a question however. I Jefferson is innocent, no one there who sympathizes with Jefferson can identify the person that did do the kicking? With all those people around? Makes no sense.
I do have a question however. I Jefferson is innocent, no one there who sympathizes with Jefferson can identify the person that did do the kicking? With all those people around? Makes no sense.
This post was edited on 8/31/11 at 11:10 am
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:08 am to Choctaw
quote:
because you seem to be hardlegging for the lying, theiving, woman beater while throwing the LSU player who's never been in trouble before completely under the bus.
Do a search you miserable little troll....I have actually referred to Lowery as scum.
So unless you have anything other than your worthless made up rumors...please just stop.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:08 am to CptBengal
quote:
His qualifying statement destroys his first comment.
That's simply not true.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:09 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
I'm not being intellectually dishonest. Read what I said carefully.
The employees statement doesn't completely exonerate Jefferson but it does place him away from the fight for a period of time while the fight is occurring.
In a criminal law setting, this is a pretty important piece of evidence because the State has to prove behind a reasonable doubt that Jefferson is guilty.
Is it possible that the employee just missed the time when Jefferson kicked somebody? Yes.
But being that this fight most likely didn't last very long and we can place Jefferson away from the fight for some time period, the State's burden gets harder and harder.
Lowery is going to have a lot of problems as a witness given his history and what has transpired since the fight. I called him toxic earlier this week and I still stand by that. The DA may not even put him on the stand because of how he'll come off to a jury.
Dropping knowledge!
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:10 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
That's simply not true.
bullshite Antonio. He knows a cop or some shite.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:10 am to CptBengal
quote:
I have actually referred to Lowery as scum.
But you'll take his word over JJ's, right?
You are pathetic.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:11 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
The employees statement doesn't completely exonerate Jefferson but it does place him away from the fight for a period of time while the fight is occurring.
That's not what you said the first time...should i go link your post?
quote:
this is a pretty important piece of evidence because the State has to prove behind a reasonable doubt that Jefferson is guilty.
agreed, but that statement does not exonerate him.
quote:
But being that this fight most likely didn't last very long
long enough for a truck to show up, three people to get beaten, a fourth to help them back to the truck, time enough for the truck to leave and then the 4th to be beaten and kicked on the ground.
I'm sure it was mere seconds.
quote:
Lowery is going to have a lot of problems as a witness g
Well it's a good thing they have other witnesses then. You don't think they realized the guy had issues at some point in the week prior to the arrest?
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:13 am to CptBengal
its pretty obvious you picked sides. don't play dumb
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:13 am to CptBengal
quote:
Well it's a good thing they have other witnesses then. You don't think they realized the guy had issues at some point in the week prior to the arrest?
So do the players. What's your point?
eta: I like how you're trying to tell us you haven't picked a side then post a gem like this.
This post was edited on 8/31/11 at 11:14 am
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:13 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
That's simply not true.
again, your lack of intellectual honesty about his qualifying statement is sad.
I suggest you go reread his full statement to the media.
Posted on 8/31/11 at 11:14 am to CptBengal
quote:
again, your lack of intellectual honesty about his qualifying statement is sad.
I suggest you go reread his full statement to the media
You got called out brah. It's ok to admit when you're wrong from time to time copper.
Popular
Back to top


0





