- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Unglesby to ask Les to lift JJ's suspension (with link)
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:47 am to Jester
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:47 am to Jester
quote:
Okay, another racist has outed himself.
I'm white. I also prefer Jarrett Lee as our starting quarterback. However, I also believe in justice and due process. Let the courts handle the punishment. LSU does not need to pile on the kid and totally ruin his life. Help the young man learn from this and keep himself on a positive path.
Is that so damned absurd?
Okay, I'm not touching the race issue, because I honestly don't think that has any part in any of this.
What I would like to point out is that employers, social clubs, etc., etc. don't need to wait on due process to punish some one. Since JJ receives compensation in the form of scholarship money (no we aren't going to get into that discussion) let's compare him to employees of other institutions. The company I work for makes no bones about it: If you get charged or arrested for anything, including a DUI, you are out of the door -- it has happened twice this year. If you do anything that gives the appearance of a conflict of interest -- you are out the door. In either case, they don't need proof, they don't need a conviction. Only the perception of wrong doing is enough to get you dismissed. Why? Because in the real world, perception is reality.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:48 am to just me
I see the usually suspects here again.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:49 am to Chicot
quote:
you get charged or arrested for anything, including a DUI, you are out of the door -- it has happened twice this year. If you do anything that gives the appearance of a conflict of interest -- you are out the door. In either case, they don't need proof, they don't need a conviction. Only the perception of wrong doing is enough to get you dismissed. Why? Because in the real world, perception is reality
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:49 am to TheDoc
Dwi is a very dangerous act which results in many deaths a year.
Kicking a person who starts a fight in the head on the ground is over the line.
Kicking a person who starts a fight in the head on the ground is over the line.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:49 am to just me
quote:
Even though you flat out lost it
other attorneys posted the definition. you were wrong. why lie now?
quote:
believe that if you repeat it enough, someone might believe you.
link your thread about JJ's return to glory...let the people decide. Tiger312 posted the definition in the thread. The one you got wrong.
quote:
You actually believe that if you question my credentials,
What credentials, your baseless claims on an anonymous message board?
quote:
I've been posting for six years.
:slowclap:
quote:
. People KNOW that I am an attorney.
Again, your baseless claims on a message board mean nothing. Oh and if it's based on your scholarly legal analysis...I would be wary to trust someone who got a simple definitional term wrong, or worse purposefully misused the term.
quote:
The admins can see my wed address and my email address.
So let's say you ARE an attorney. Then obviously you need to reread basic definitions. Or were you blatantly misrepresenting the term to try and make a point?
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:49 am to Jester
quote:
idiots in this thread that want him kicked out of school,
He has graduated, he isn't seeking a graduate degree. He is only in school to play football.
He is bringing negative attention to LSU, and is a distraction for the football team.
There is no real positive for allowing him to continue in school, just in the hopes of possibly playing football again.
From the pure standpoint of LSU as a place of academia, JJ isn't worth the bad press.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:49 am to CptBengal
quote:
then start by forgiving yourself.
it was only a definitional term....one you simply got wrong. No big deal.
I'll still believe you're really a lawyer if it'll make you buck up there champ!
You have completely left the argument, and now you're just trying to troll me.
Now THAT is hysterical. Because you think that I care what a pissant like you thinks.
Really?!?!
You think that I'm sitting in my office on the 47th floor planning for my upcoming trial and worrying about what some kid thinks?
You really, really think that. You do, don't you. You're sitting there thinking that you really just BOOMed me.
You fricking kill me. Don't ever stop posting.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:51 am to Chicot
quote:
The company I work for makes no bones about it: If you get charged or arrested for anything, including a DUI, you are out of the door -- it has happened twice this year. If you do anything that gives the appearance of a conflict of interest -- you are out the door. In either case, they don't need proof, they don't need a conviction. Only the perception of wrong doing is enough to get you dismissed. Why? Because in the real world, perception is reality.
However, that is clearly not the case at LSU. RP pulls a gun and gets a slap on the wrist. T-Bob drives drunk and gets a short suspension. I would not be opposed to that policy, but that is NOT the policy with LSU football.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:51 am to LSU-MNCBABY
quote:
He has graduated, he isn't seeking a graduate degree. He is only in school to play football.
He is bringing negative attention to LSU, and is a distraction for the football team.
There is no real positive for allowing him to continue in school, just in the hopes of possibly playing football again.
From the pure standpoint of LSU as a place of academia, JJ isn't worth the bad press.
/thread
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:51 am to TheDoc
Wasnt he found guilty of DWI?
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:52 am to just me
quote:
just me
The legal advice and predictions you have made since day 1 have been completely wrong. You are probably a 1L dropout who thinks he knows it all.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:52 am to just me
quote:
You think that I'm sitting in my office on the 47th floor planning for my upcoming trial and worrying about what some kid thinks?
You have 32,00 posts on a message board, and seem to argue with CPT Bengal every day, so it does appear that you are somewhat concerned about this, yes.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:54 am to drexyl
Posting this again..... You guys are amazing....you guys are using this incident(the fight) as cover for your disdain for this kid. "He should just go away and stop being a distraction" is hilarious to me....he is not a distraction to the team.....they like him and want him around......he is a distraction to yall because he poses a threat to your aggenda of playing "your" QB..........some of you would rather lose with JL behind center versus win with JJ behind center.....bar fight or no bar fight......and please spare me with the negative publicity angle....Everyone I have spoke to that don't live in the immediate area and has no aggenda is trying to figure out how this got so big....over a bar fight....
Everyone sees right through your disingenuous argument about bad pub, JJ has shown lack of leadership crap....Smart people also see through the "I liked him but we need to all rally around JL sentiment".....You guys are the sames folks that refused to rally around this kid but you want everyone to rally around "your" guy..... A true LSU fan sees both of these kids as "their" guy. JJ has gotten himself into a pickle and you jackasses are on this board pushing your own aggenda and using the "best interest of the program" as cover....you guys are pitiful....you must have horrible personal lives.....
Everyone sees right through your disingenuous argument about bad pub, JJ has shown lack of leadership crap....Smart people also see through the "I liked him but we need to all rally around JL sentiment".....You guys are the sames folks that refused to rally around this kid but you want everyone to rally around "your" guy..... A true LSU fan sees both of these kids as "their" guy. JJ has gotten himself into a pickle and you jackasses are on this board pushing your own aggenda and using the "best interest of the program" as cover....you guys are pitiful....you must have horrible personal lives.....
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:54 am to just me
quote:
ou think that I'm sitting in my office on the 47th floor planning for my upcoming trial and worrying about what some kid thinks?
your continued response belies your comment.
Your failure of legal analysis about JJ's situation from day 1 further elucidates the point.
Finally, if you really are an attorney, and you really are prepping a case...you should be fired for professional misconduct for charging you clients to post on TD.
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:55 am to The Gooch
quote:
The Gooch
I couldn't read that no lie. Restructure your sentences atleast to the 3rd grade level. Thanks
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:56 am to TheDoc
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is also appears to be a violation of Rule 3.6 of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Never stopped any of them from doing it
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is also appears to be a violation of Rule 3.6 of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
Boom
Never stopped any of them from doing it
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:57 am to The Gooch
quote:
JJ has gotten himself into a pickle
Exactly
No one is responsible for his actions except for him
Posted on 8/30/11 at 9:59 am to CptBengal
quote:You can't even start this post with the truth. That's very sad.
other attorneys posted the definition.
One attorney posted a definition. He posted the definition of a related but different term. A "third party" is not a "third party witness." It's okay. I corrected his error.
quote:
[drivel]
quote:
[drivel]
quote:
[drivel]
quote:
[drivel]
quote:
[drivel]
quote:Yeah, I don't respond to crap. However, in your case, I'm willing to respond to a crappy poster.
[drivel]
Popular
Back to top


2





