To all Oregon lovers - 2 wins against winning record teams?

Now, don't get me wrong, I think Oregon has a fabulously exciting offense, Their productivity in yardage and scoring sure are impressive.

However, I would like to call to mind 2 facts

1) Oregon has beaten/played a total of 2 TEAMS with a winning record in 2010...-AND-....

2) Recall all of those years when the likes of Texas, Oklahoma, Florida beat unranked after unranked team to the tune of 56-7 or so, only to get held to very modest yardage and point totals when facing a "REAL DEFENSE"?

Here are the current national rankings of the teams they have put those numbers up against:

Losing Record opponents (7):
New Mexico (1-8) 118th defense
Tenn (3-6) 78th defense
Port St (2-7) N/A - Not FBS opponent
Ariz St (4-5) 48th defense
Wash St (1-9) 120th defense
UCLA (4-5) 83rd defense
Wash (3-6) 107th defense

Winning Record opponents (2):
Stanford (8-1) 37th defense
USC (6-3) 107th defense


Summary of achievement:
2 wins against winning opponents
1 win against a winning program with a top 40 defense (Stanford)

Granted, Oregon has great athletes, but so did all those 9 and 10 win Texas, Oklahoma, Florida and Ohio State type teams over the years UNTIL they faced teams with a real defense.

Oregon has very little to really hang their hat on despite a lot of impressive offensive performances against a host of poor opponents.

The pollsters love exciting offense, so they have not even come close to breaking it all down. Of course, going 9-0 and being one of the only unbeatens does make them worthy of being highly ranked, but the lack of accomplishments should be taken into consideration, and that goes for Stanford also who have built up thier 8-1 record against the same trash teams with losing records and/or porous defenses.