- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The LIE about talent
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:33 am to Open Your Eyes
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:33 am to Open Your Eyes
Again, next time make your point of gtfo. You’ve lost my interest here.
2
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:33 am to FreeDevin40
Look, I know there are some holes in my argument. Maybe I didn't articulate very well.
The point is, I hate the fact Ed blamed the players and put no blame on the scheme. Steve E gets paid millions, or at least hundreds of thousands, he can take the heat.
LSU could have played better. But they damn sure could have coached better.
The point is, I hate the fact Ed blamed the players and put no blame on the scheme. Steve E gets paid millions, or at least hundreds of thousands, he can take the heat.
LSU could have played better. But they damn sure could have coached better.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:33 am to Lester Earl
quote:
You’ve lost my interest here.
Then gtfo.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:34 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Again, next time make your point of gtfo.
The fact that you still can’t abswer a very simple question is making my point better than I ever could have.
quote:
You’ve lost my interest here.
So how many more times are you going to respond to let me know you’re not interested in answering a very simple question?
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:37 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
It’s pretty simple. If you conclude that it’s the LSU OL play that shite the game away, and know those teams all put up better offensive numbers than LSU against Bama, then you have to conclude that their offensive lines are better than LSU’s
No. No you don't. Saturday night was the first time that Tua played into the fourth quarter. I would imagine that a lot of those scores were after bama had run up fifty points on them and bama had their thirds in the game.
I don't see how you can come to the conclusion that all of those lines are better than LSU'S.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:38 am to bencoleman
quote:
I would imagine that a lot of those scores were after bama had run up fifty points on them and bama had their thirds in the game.
And per usual, you'd be wrong.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:40 am to bencoleman
quote:
No. No you don't. Saturday night was the first time that Tua played into the fourth quarter.
Ole miss, Missouri, and Arkansas all scored touchdowns against Alabama in the first quarter.
quote:
I would imagine that a lot of those scores were after bama had run up fifty points on them and bama had their thirds in the game.
You would imagine wrong. Who could’ve possibly predicted that?
quote:
I don't see how you can come to the conclusion that all of those lines are better than LSU'S.
I don’t either. But if you were capable of logical thought, you would. That explains a lot actually.
This post was edited on 11/5/18 at 11:42 am
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:42 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
And per usual, you'd be wrong
No I'm not. Mizzou scored on them in the first quarter. Other than that I'm not sure but I will check when I get home.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:43 am to bencoleman
quote:
No I'm not. Mizzou scored on them in the first quarter. Other than that I'm not sure but I will check when I get home.
Ole Miss on play number one. Arkansas scored TDs in the first and second quarters. A&M scored a TD in the first quarter.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:46 am to bencoleman
quote:
Oh so you're breaking out the old lying routine. Yeah you have a great day.
Triggered.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:47 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
I don’t either. But if you were capable of logical thought, you would. That explains a lot actually
So now you think that the offensive line sucks. Earlier it wasn't the Oline. You can't pick a side and stick with it.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:54 am to bencoleman
LSU showed their hand early and Alabama knew that the Tigers were not going to run, so they just pinned their ears back and came. They didn't have to blitz, so that freed the linebackers up to take care of LSU's run game. LSU stayed with this game plan, so Alabama just kept on coming. LSU's scheme was a gift for Alabama.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:07 pm to tigerborderjumper
quote:
LSU showed their hand early and Alabama knew that the Tigers were not going to run, so they just pinned their ears back and came. They didn't have to blitz, so that freed the linebackers up to take care of LSU's run game. LSU stayed with this game plan, so Alabama just kept on coming. LSU's scheme was a gift for Alabama
So does this explain Bama's dominance at the line of scrimmage?
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:14 pm to bencoleman
quote:
So now you think that the offensive line sucks. Earlier it wasn't the Oline. You can't pick a side and stick with it.
Literally none of that is true.
You are lying again.
Why do you feel the need to constantly lie anonymously on the Internet Ben? Do you think it makes you look cool or something?
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:21 pm to bencoleman
quote:
So does this explain Bama's dominance at the line of scrimmage?
Since Alabama was not concerned about LSU running the ball, their DL didn't have worry about reads. Yes, they were obviously a talent gap, but LSU's play calling just made it easy for Alabama. This made the talent gap even more evident. Alabama was coached up and ready. LSU was not. Schemes and smart coaching can minimize a talent gap. By making the excuse of blaming the talent gap, you saying that LSU's offense is less talented than Alabama' previous opponents, who managed to score sometimes early against Alabama. The talent gap is partially to blame, but the coaching is far more liable.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:29 pm to FreeDevin40
quote:
LSU's d-line, without chaisson factored in because he's out, averages a .949 ranking on 24/7. That's with ferrel factored in who is the lowest at .88. Bama offered all these guys except alexander for some reason. So according to ED, these guys are good enough to play for bama but not talented to compete with them.
Your mistake: Bama did NOT offer these guys. bama routinely gives tons of offers that are NOT committable. Then they sort through the ones who want to come. Lawrence is probably the only dlineman who played Saturday that Bama would have signed.
quote:
Bama offered deculus and ingram.
Yes, and had they gone to bama they would not have seen the field yet. Maybe next year when they are much better, but not now.
I also noticed you chose not to show Bama's oline ratings for comparison.
Bama has a gigantic talent advantage. They had about 12 guys drafted last year. I promise you Bama will have significantly more guys drafted, each of the next five years, than LSU will.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:35 pm to FreeDevin40
Muh rebuild tho
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:40 pm to tigerborderjumper
Nailed it! Also it was evident to me that Bama plays with so much more effort and speed. They get off blocks and don’t miss tackles. Their backs run extremely hard.
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:42 pm to lsu311
quote:
Nailed it! Also it was evident to me that Bama plays with so much more effort and speed. They get off blocks and don’t miss tackles. Their backs run extremely hard.
It's called coaching and teaching.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News