
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The funniest thing is that even if we went back to the 2000s in terms of rules
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:47 pm
LSU would remain on top. This program doesn't NEED this transfer shite.
Zero in state comp, Lane and Orgeron on the same staff, the LSU brand.
You can put whatever limitation on it you want and this staff would still obliterate its competition.
It boils down to these motherfrickers not liking Lane at LSU .
frick Clemson. We riding.
Zero in state comp, Lane and Orgeron on the same staff, the LSU brand.
You can put whatever limitation on it you want and this staff would still obliterate its competition.
It boils down to these motherfrickers not liking Lane at LSU .
frick Clemson. We riding.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 7:54 pm to GrizzlyWintergreen
Thats why lane left OM.
It was a hedge, in case the rules changed back in favor of the traditional powers
It was a hedge, in case the rules changed back in favor of the traditional powers
Posted on 9/2/26 at 9:53 pm to The Baker
I think so too. He will absolutely continue finding loopholes until the sport levels back out, and when it does, LSU will still be a premiere destination. He cannot lose.
Posted on 9/2/26 at 10:15 pm to The Baker
He's stated as much, yes.

Popular
Back to top
1









