Started By
Message

re: The Balk...Help me understand

Posted on 6/8/21 at 11:59 am to
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4618 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 11:59 am to
quote:

You're also correct. But the undefended 1st base is also a balk.


Nope. The base does not have to be defended for the pitcher to throw there. It must simply be occupied by a runner.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164349 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 11:59 am to
People need to stop using the phrase unoccupied base. An unoccupied base is a base with no runner on it. There was a runner on 1st.

It was a throw to a fielder not on a base.

But that doesn’t really matter because the balk already happened before he threw it.
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 12:02 pm
Posted by 3rdPart Tiger
Member since Oct 2007
6262 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

People need to stop using the phrase unoccupied base.


Just going off of what coach says.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164349 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:03 pm to
Coach is wrong in his use of the phrase unoccupied base
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4618 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

sure he can. and it happens more than you’d think at high levels.
the ball goes off into the outfield and all runners take off and advance.

but it’s not a balk.



You are confused as to what an "unoccupied base" means. It references the presence of a runner, not a defender.
It has nothing to do with a defensive player defending that base.

If a pitcher throws to an unoccupied base (i.e. no runner) from the rubber (defended or not) it is a balk.
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7648 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Dude...

"The pitcher shall be charged with a balk if, while in contact with the rubber, he throws to a fielder who is either in front of or behind first or third base and obviously not making an attempt at retiring the runner at that base"




yeah, that’s throwing to the player, not the base.
had he thrown it at the bag and no one was home, it’s not a balk.
it goes down as an error and everyone gets on the merry go around and advances as far as they can.
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12193 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

he didn't throw to unoccupied base.


Correct
INcorrect

First baseman was well in front of the bag.

"The pitcher shall be charged with a balk if, while in contact with the rubber, he throws to a fielder who is either in front of or behind first or third base and obviously not making an attempt at retiring the runner at that base"
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7648 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

You are confused as to what an "unoccupied base" means. It references the presents of a runner,


yep.
i had that part backwards.

my bad.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164349 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

INcorrect

First baseman was well in front of the bag.

"The pitcher shall be charged with a balk if, while in contact with the rubber, he throws to a fielder who is either in front of or behind first or third base and obviously not making an attempt at retiring the runner at that base"

Brosef that’s not what an unoccupied base is
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12193 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:06 pm to
I'll buy that, but he threw it to the player. Fricked it up every way possible, Tiger's win Tigers win
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12193 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:06 pm to
Undefended
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12193 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:07 pm to
Obviously the base was occupied by Beloso
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 12:08 pm
Posted by KC Tiger
Member since Sep 2006
4618 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Fishhead


I'm not trying to demean you, but you should really read and understand the rules of baseball before you post on here. First base was occupied. Period. Hard Stop. Anybody who says first base was unoccupied doesn't understand the rules. That is not why it was a balk.

It was a balk because the pitcher DID NOT THROW TO AN OCCUPIED BASE. He threw it half-way up the line. The balk had nothing to do with the base being occupied (because it was).

A defender cannot occupy a base. Only a runner can occupy a base.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164349 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

It was a balk because the pitcher DID NOT THROW TO AN OCCUPIED BASE. He threw it half-way up the line.

It was also a balk because motioned to 1st, paused, stumbled, and opened up too much to the plate before he threw it.
Posted by BigEd
South Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
59 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:18 pm to
The pitcher shall be charged with a balk if, while in contact with the rubber, he throws to a fielder who is either in front of or behind first or third base and obviously not making an attempt at retiring the runner at that base. However, there is no violation if the pitcher throws the ball directly to first or third base in this situation.
Posted by thekid
Anna, Tx
Member since May 2006
3940 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:24 pm to
Just re-watched it...there was no stumble
Posted by 1BIGTigerFan
100,000 posts
Member since Jan 2007
49272 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

I felt we had that pitched psyched out when he kept throwing to 1st while the runner was standing on it.

He was never more than two steps off the base. Obviously he wasn't running, but the pitcher kept tossing it over there. At that point, I figured they were trying to give the Bullpen time to get someone warm...or the pitchers head was fricked and he didn't want to throw it to the plate.
Posted by NCTiger2
Member since Jun 2021
528 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:30 pm to
Pitchers don’t get a ton of reps practicing 1st and 3rds and bunt defense while the infielders can do it in their sleep. The pitcher probably forgot the play was on and was trying to see if Thompson would show bunt if he picked up his leg like he did 1000x before that.
Posted by Fishhead
Elmendorf, TX
Member since Jan 2008
12193 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

KC Tiger

I assumed y'all were saying "occupied" meaning defended.
Obviously the base was occupied, but it was no longer defended, which is a balk.

I don't need to read and understand the rule. I literally quoted it.

I just thought y'all were calling undefended unoccupied.
This post was edited on 6/8/21 at 12:36 pm
Posted by Bomont
Member since May 2021
975 posts
Posted on 6/8/21 at 12:33 pm to
Play arse clown games win arse clown prizes
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram