- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The amount of holding on both sides is wild
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:37 pm
When they finally call a holding penalty then you'll know the refs are cheating.
So far they eject a uga corner for hitting with his pads not the crown of the helmet but Stockton gets murdered and no review.
So far they eject a uga corner for hitting with his pads not the crown of the helmet but Stockton gets murdered and no review.
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 9:38 pm
4
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:42 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
So far they eject a uga corner for hitting with his pads not the crown of the helmet
The crown of the helmet is not a requirement for targeting in college football; you need to learn the rules.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:47 pm to sharkfhin
Forcible contact to the head or neck area constitutes targeting.
By the letter of the law it was the correct call.
By the letter of the law it was the correct call.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:48 pm to mdomingue
I know the rules and he wasnt hitting a defenseless runner. He "already" had possession and was running with the ball. Maybe you should "learn the rules".
Leading with the crown does come into play when the ball carrier is not defenseless. He wasnt. He gave him good ole fashioned shoulder pads. He didnt lead with the crown of his body(helmet) in that situation so it should have not been targeting. If the kid was defenseless which he wasnt(dont listen to the media idiots)then I could see perhaps.
Leading with the crown does come into play when the ball carrier is not defenseless. He wasnt. He gave him good ole fashioned shoulder pads. He didnt lead with the crown of his body(helmet) in that situation so it should have not been targeting. If the kid was defenseless which he wasnt(dont listen to the media idiots)then I could see perhaps.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:49 pm to SmoothBox
quote:there is no such thing as forcible contact.
Forcible contact
and he didnt hit him in the head.This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 9:51 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:54 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
I know the rules and he wasnt hitting a defenseless runner.
That's fair, you should have led with that. The problem was that they ruled he was a defenseless player. I did actually say that to my son, that I didn't think he was defenseless.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:56 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
and he didnt hit him in the head.
He hit him right in the facemask, man.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:58 pm to sharkfhin
OM having 1 penalty on the night seems awfully suspect to me.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 9:58 pm to GeauxTigersNC
They usually play clean football but there are alot of holds and no calls.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:02 pm to mdomingue
The runner put himself in that position, he is supposed to lower his shoulder and "win field position" not retreat like a pussy. A runner cannot be considered defenseless while running forward unless its helmet to helmet. A defender using his oads should never be called for targeting regardless where the contact occured. Maybe they should have a rule for improper rushing of the football It was a bullshite call just like the bullshite no call on Stockton. Refs are DEI/woke enhanced just like you bro
It was a bullshite call just like the bullshite no call on Stockton. Refs are DEI/woke enhanced just like you bro This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 10:04 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:05 pm to sharkfhin
They actually average 5.8 almost 6 a game. I understand it’s not over but as I stated 1 is suspect.
Curious the only other time they have had 1 was against Tulane last game. Interesting that they lose their head coach and become more disciplined.
Curious the only other time they have had 1 was against Tulane last game. Interesting that they lose their head coach and become more disciplined.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:06 pm to mdomingue
quote:that was my argument and thought it was a bs call.
ruled he was a defenseless player
Geaux Tigers
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:08 pm to GeauxTigersNC
I can agree. Just watch the oline on every play. On the drive ole miss had the big pass and then the run to make it 19, the oline literally across the line held the whole dline. No calls.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:25 pm to sharkfhin
quote:
DEI/woke enhanced just like you bro
The rules are what they are. Whether we like them or not.
I thought DEI folks were the ones who liked to ignore the rules.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:26 pm to mdomingue
That hold was on Stockton. Just throw it away.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 10:26 pm to sharkfhin
A hit to the head is targeting regardless of what part of the body.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News