- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stanford-Washington tonight; LSU related
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:09 pm to Tigercoop40
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:09 pm to Tigercoop40
Stanford is the one that had the bye week...
1
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:10 pm to Fishhead
Ahh I misheard the announcer earlier then. I really don't know Stanford or Washington's schedules.
Stanford only with 2 first downs at this point in the game.
Stanford only with 2 first downs at this point in the game.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:10 pm to Tigercoop40
I agree that those are all valid points. Cant wait for Oct 6.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:11 pm to DollaChoppa
Are you looking past Towson? 
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:11 pm to DollaChoppa
Josh Nunes is goddamn terrible, holy crap
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:12 pm to Stonewall Tiger
Stanford's defense is very good, tough and physical..and USC is very, very soft 
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:13 pm to Stonewall Tiger
I disagree with everyone saying USC sucks or is overrated. USC has some very talented players.
The only difference between LSU/Alabama and USC is depth. Especially depth on the OLine and DLine.
Against Stanford USC was without their Center. On a already thin OLine.
USC's DLine is the weakness of their team. They are very thin there.
The only difference between LSU/Alabama and USC is depth. Especially depth on the OLine and DLine.
Against Stanford USC was without their Center. On a already thin OLine.
USC's DLine is the weakness of their team. They are very thin there.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:16 pm to Puffoluffagus
I've got firefox + a couple blockers. MAybe I'm blocking too much.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:16 pm to Tigercoop40
USC is overrated, because they can barely field a 2 deep. They've got talent, sure, but once you get past the starters there is a SEVERE drop off.
They're a good team, they're not an elite team.
They're a good team, they're not an elite team.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:18 pm to HMTVBrian2
we looking good right now
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:19 pm to HMTVBrian2
Agree. They have a good OFFENSE. They have good SKILL players. They are not an elite team, even if you only count the 1st stringers.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:21 pm to Fishhead
I'll agree with that statement.
If you can't control the line of scrimmage it is very hard for you to win a game.
A very good example of this at the moment is Arkansas. Yea they have Tyler Wilson, Cobi Hamilton, Chris Gragg, and Knile Davis.. But No OLine or DLine, along with defense.
USC and Oregon are "Elite" teams when they don't play teams that have a dominant DLine. When they play a Elite DLine they get exposed.
If you can't control the line of scrimmage it is very hard for you to win a game.
A very good example of this at the moment is Arkansas. Yea they have Tyler Wilson, Cobi Hamilton, Chris Gragg, and Knile Davis.. But No OLine or DLine, along with defense.
USC and Oregon are "Elite" teams when they don't play teams that have a dominant DLine. When they play a Elite DLine they get exposed.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:22 pm to Fishhead
I think if you're comparing starting units they're probably right up there with the best teams in the country, but you need more than starters to win a close football game.
Depth along the line and all over the D is the reason LSU and Alabama were so much better than everybody last year.
Depth along the line and all over the D is the reason LSU and Alabama were so much better than everybody last year.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:22 pm to Tigercoop40
Bottom line. PAC 12 blows. We already knew this
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:23 pm to HMTVBrian2
Stanford's offense is worse than ours
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:24 pm to sunnydaze
Stanford is a QB away from being a really good team I think. They're built well up front and run the ball well.
Nunes is horrible, though. Just terrible.
Nunes is horrible, though. Just terrible.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:24 pm to Springlake Tiger
Go dawgs!
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:25 pm to HMTVBrian2
Up till recently having a solid starting unit was all it took to win games.
LSU and Alabama have really pushed the issue the past few years in rotating lineman, rotating running backs, etc.. Keeping players fresh and keeping the pressure on.
The "Experts" on ESPN a few weeks ago stated that LSU's 3rd String DLine was already better then 10 starting units in the B1G Conference.
LSU and Alabama have really pushed the issue the past few years in rotating lineman, rotating running backs, etc.. Keeping players fresh and keeping the pressure on.
The "Experts" on ESPN a few weeks ago stated that LSU's 3rd String DLine was already better then 10 starting units in the B1G Conference.
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:25 pm to Meauxjeaux
Have you tried that other site?
Posted on 9/27/12 at 9:29 pm to DollaChoppa
quote:
You guys are crazy. Washington is gonna get torn apart. They can't match up with a team like Stanford, same reason they couldnt match up with LSU.
Don't you feel like fools now...
Page 4 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News