Started By
Message

Somebody explain why a player must sit a play after his helmet comes off....

Posted on 11/2/19 at 12:56 pm
Posted by Tiger Abe
Tiger Town
Member since Aug 2011
795 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 12:56 pm
That has to be the dumbest rule in college football. It accomplishes exactly dick! Furthermore, it can have a huge impact on the game depending upon when it occurs and who the player is....

Ok, I feel better!


This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 12:57 pm
Posted by reggieray420
Member since Dec 2016
2700 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 12:57 pm to
It's fricking stupid.
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37562 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 12:57 pm to
Player safety. They want to make sure the player securely puts the helmet back on instead of rushing it

It’s stupid
Posted by Tiger Abe
Tiger Town
Member since Aug 2011
795 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 12:57 pm to
AGREED!


Posted by Coater
Madison, MS
Member since Jun 2005
33055 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 12:59 pm to
Several years ago players were letting their hair get out of control such that helmets came off regularly. Seeing it as a potential safety issue they implemented this to encourage players to keep their helmets securely fastened
Posted by FAP SAM
Member since Sep 2014
2871 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

They want to make sure the player securely puts the helmet back on instead of rushing it

No, they did it to make sure players put their helmet on securely in the first place, vs being very loose and not giving as good of protection. I also am not a big fan of the rule tho
Posted by raineysky
DeRidder, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
472 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:07 pm to
Helmets should be optional. Our fullback wouldn't wear one for sure...

Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98124 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

our fullback wouldn't wear one for sure...

?





Welp, since he doesnt play in this offense....

Sure could have used him a couple of times last week tho.
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22887 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:12 pm to
I don’t know why players don’t take more advantage of this rule. 4th down and short coming up? Rip the star players helmet off the play before so he doesn’t get to run the ball up the middle.
Posted by mattchewbocca
houma, la
Member since Jun 2008
5349 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Player safety. They want to make sure the player securely puts the helmet back on instead of rushing it



It’s like how many steps do they think it takes to do this? Lol

Step number 1: put on helmet
This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 1:15 pm
Posted by LSUGraduate2002
Kenner
Member since Nov 2008
192 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:14 pm to
If the helmet comes off bc of a penalty caused by the other team the player doesn’t have to sit. Same rule in high school.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98124 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

I don’t know why players don’t take more advantage of this rule. 4th down and short coming up? Rip the star players helmet off the play before so he doesn’t get to run the ball up the middle.


That would be a penalty, and the player gets to stay in the game anyway.
Posted by HuckFinn
Member since Jan 2014
547 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:18 pm to
They only sit out a play if they deliberately remove their helmet. They do not have to sit out if their helmet is removed as a result of a face mask. This rule was put in place to discourage players from celebrating a big play by removing their helmet so the world can see their face.
Posted by Tiger Abe
Tiger Town
Member since Aug 2011
795 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:22 pm to
That's incorrect. If the player's helmet comes off as a result of any reason other than a penalty, the guy has to sit for a play.....


Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17778 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

This rule was put in place to discourage players from celebrating a big play by removing their helmet so the world can see their face.


No, that's a different thing, which would result in an unsportsmanlike penalty.
Posted by HoustonTigerNKaty
Member since Aug 2018
620 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:35 pm to
That’s two different rules. Originally NFL outlawed the “Emmitt Smith” celebration of taking off of helmet after big plays by calling unsportsmanlike conduct.

Sitting after a player’s helmet comes off was instituted as a player safety thing. If you remember Warren Sapp and others used to have their helmets come off regularly because it was not on correctly (there was a famous sack of Brett Farve) and these players making plays sans-headgear got a lot of press.

Like most things in NFL and college it began trickling into the high school game and younger leagues.

The current rule in pro / college are more along the lines of “setting the example.”

On the record as hating the rule. Could easily be fixed with a warning (firsr time) followed by yardage.
Posted by cphill
Member since Sep 2009
1220 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:37 pm to
I never understood this, either. Seems silly.....
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
7310 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:39 pm to
Well, it’s supposed to be a penalty. A couple of times I’ve seen an LSU player’s helmet ripped off without a penalty and he had to sit out a play.
This post was edited on 11/2/19 at 1:43 pm
Posted by southernelite
Dallas
Member since Sep 2009
53140 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 1:42 pm to
How do so many people in this thread not understand the damn rule?
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22887 posts
Posted on 11/2/19 at 2:17 pm to
Gotta be sneaky sneaky about it
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram