- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:59 am to Brown Mountain
quote:
The outside of the stadium as a whole is pretty horrendous. I'm not sure how anyone could disagree.
I disagree. But I'm also not miserable by nature.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:59 am to TigerNlc
quote:
Yeah, it looks like shite. I don't think anything could be done to cover it up or make it look decent.
They can be torn down.
Perhaps they could embed some walkway within the stadium to allow those fans to access the restrooms and concessions on the east and west sides of the stadium.
It would be a bit of a walk, but most would be visiting fans anyway.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:01 am to lsu2006
I'm sure you think the P-Mac is a nice looking building as well.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:03 am to Brown Mountain
quote:
I'm sure you think the P-Mac is a nice looking building as well.
I don't. I actually wish it was modeled after the Parker Coliseum. It's nice on the inside, though.
Not that that has anything at all to do with Tiger Stadium.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:06 am to Filmat11
I'm not a fan of the boxes but they're not horrible. LSU could place flags along the top which would somewhat hide the boxes.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:07 am to lsu2006
Tiger Stadium just looks odd and hodge podged now. I'm glad they are making it nicer and all that but just doesn't seemed all tied together very well.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:08 am to Brown Mountain
quote:
The outside of the stadium as a whole is pretty horrendous. I'm not sure how anyone could disagree.
I don't think it's that bad. Those blocks just bother me a lot for some reason and the glass structure does too somewhat but it looks better than it did before.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:09 am to GeorgeReymond
I believe flags were in the rendering, but not positive, and I also think they will help.
IMO, nothing will hide the fact that there are shitters on top of the stadium, though.
IMO, nothing will hide the fact that there are shitters on top of the stadium, though.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:09 am to Chad504boy
quote:
Tiger Stadium just looks odd and hodge podged now.
And has since about the 1940's. Why are we bitching now about an attempt to at least somewhat emulate the architecture of the NEZ?
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:11 am to Brown Mountain
quote:
The outside of the stadium as a whole is pretty horrendous. I'm not sure how anyone could disagree.
I can't disagree. I cringed every time ESPN showed the stadium in the background during the regional. It looks like we have 3 different stadiums just bunched together. Is there such a thing as Abstract architecture?
You can take an architectural tour down the Chicago River and not see as many different types of architecture (hyperboles are literally the worst things in the world).
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:11 am to TigerNlc
quote:
I don't think it's that bad. Those blocks just bother me a lot for some reason and the glass structure does too somewhat but it looks better than it did before.
Individually (E, W, S, I havent seen the new north yet) they look fine (minus the blocks). But together its looks like a mess.
I think the West side is the biggest problem area. If it looked at all like the rest of the stadium it would look great. (blocks or no blocks)
This post was edited on 6/10/14 at 10:16 am
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:14 am to Filmat11
Those concession and bathroom legos are gonna turn into some nasty sweat boxes early in the season with that much sun exposure.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:17 am to Brown Mountain
quote:
IMO, nothing will hide the fact that there are shitters on top of the stadium, though.
Should have went a little higher with the top, that's how the Romans hid their shitters.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:29 am to lsu2006
quote:
And has since about the 1940's. Why are we bitching now about an attempt to at least somewhat emulate the architecture of the NEZ?
that's what i can't understand. lsu finally tries to match what everyone loves about the original tiger stadium, and people still find a way to complain. i think some people truly love never to be happy with anything
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:30 am to Filmat11
quote:
Notice the Plane is back on its stand!
Bob the Terrible rejoices!
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:31 am to Filmat11
I've always felt that we are missing one more set of arches where the blue moisture barrier is showing. To me it looks like a weird gap from the west side to the south side. Maybe they plan on closing in that gap once the construction elevator is removed, does anyone know?
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:36 am to Emteein
Rendering doesn't have a gap but who knows.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:38 am to lsufball19
quote:
lsu finally tries to match what everyone loves about the original tiger stadium, and people still find a way to complain.
I appreciate it. I like it.
I dislike that it isn't the same color. And it makes the West side look worse than it already did.
Just don't understand how our stadium has to be so cookie cutter and other stadiums look like they match. That's why people complain.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 10:39 am to Emteein
On second thought it will probably look more like this.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News