Started By
Message
locked post

Should not have started Eades

Posted on 6/10/12 at 9:59 pm
Posted by wranda2
Prairieville
Member since Sep 2008
483 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 9:59 pm
I would have rathered Cotton, Bovillain, or Bourgious. Atleast 4 of their runs came against Eades.
Posted by RGJ18
Collierville, TN
Member since Feb 2010
8679 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:00 pm to
Hindsight is 20/20
Posted by southernelite
Dallas
Member since Sep 2009
53177 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:00 pm to
Shut the frick up
Posted by NicoBlues
I eat frogs
Member since Dec 2009
15048 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:00 pm to
Woo brageous is going to call you a negatiger
Posted by JakeRStephenes
Member since Feb 2012
2588 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:00 pm to
Wouldn't have mattered at all.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171036 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:00 pm to
Pitching wasn't the problem, asshat. Without 4 of those, we're still losing 3-2
Posted by TXGunslinger10
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2011
17995 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:00 pm to
It wouldn't have mattered.

3 hits
This post was edited on 6/10/12 at 10:01 pm
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Hindsight is 20/20


A lot of people thought this FWIW. He really killed us giving those 4 easy runs.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127402 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:00 pm to
Would have liked that idea myself in all honesty. If SB didn't have confidence in their #3 pitcher, we should be playing our cards similarly.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62431 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:01 pm to
Almost everyone said this...and knew what was coming.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
19809 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:01 pm to
Would still be 3-2. He only gave up 4 runs.
Posted by DeathValleyHeros
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2004
3511 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:02 pm to
It wouldn't have mattered if we would have started Justin Verlander in this one.
Posted by wranda2
Prairieville
Member since Sep 2008
483 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:02 pm to
I think the best thing to do was let them waste their ace vs eades yesterday and pitch gausman in game 3 to send you to omaha.
Posted by Corn Dawg Nation
Member since Oct 2009
3530 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:03 pm to
Doesn't matter who pitches if you can't score runs.
Posted by tadelatt
Buga Nation
Member since Jan 2010
12255 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

I would have rathered Cotton, Bovillain, or Bourgious. Atleast 4 of their runs came against Eades.



Good call. We probably shouldn't have given up 7 runs either
Posted by DA
Member since Sep 2007
16251 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:05 pm to
Left him in about 6 hits too long. He was laboring in the first inning and he should have been on a VERY short leash to begin with. Especially considering out hitting prowess.
Posted by Gtiger9757
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
8730 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:06 pm to
I thought we should have started eades for game two since we won game 1. Save KG for this game.
Posted by Hat Tricks
Member since Oct 2003
28612 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:07 pm to
Moron. We have 4 hits the last 2 days combined! It wouldn't have mattered who started.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:08 pm to
By the time third inning rolled around, he had over 50 pitches. If you have that many in the 3rd, something's wrong.
Posted by wranda2
Prairieville
Member since Sep 2008
483 posts
Posted on 6/10/12 at 10:08 pm to
exactly. our ace vs their number 3. i dont care how many hits we get. i like our chances
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram