- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC runner up should always get Sugar
Posted on 12/6/22 at 4:08 am to LouisianaLonghorn
Posted on 12/6/22 at 4:08 am to LouisianaLonghorn
quote:You snooze against 5$7, you lose.
We shite the bed. We deserve what we got.
You got the "Can't spell Citrus without UT" Bowl at 1pm on a Monday work day against an unranked team.
Would much rather the Gator Bowl at 3:30 against Notre Dame in Jacksonville..........
This post was edited on 12/6/22 at 4:25 am
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:24 am to ForeverEllisHugh
Definitely agree… With the 12 team format, does the Sugar Bowl forever become a semifinal AND final venue?
Posted on 12/6/22 at 5:48 am to Timeoday
Makes no sense; troll poster
Posted on 12/6/22 at 9:42 am to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:
quote:
Was Purdue the runner up in the Big 10?
quote:come on, man. Michigan and Ohio State were CLEARLY the top 2 teams in the Big Ten.
They were. Same thing.
Now yes, I understand your argument that Purdue won their division and played in the CCG, but that doesn't make them the "runner up" in my mind. It was just a consequence of the division splits this year.
Big Ten has 2 teams in the playoff, and Penn State got picked for the Rose Bowl.
So if you want to argue a technicality about Purdue being the runner up and they go to the Rose Bowl, have at it.
But that's not the way it should be, at all.
Back to top

0




