- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sam Montgomery???
Posted on 2/25/10 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 2/25/10 at 4:54 pm
Possibly moving inside to DT according to TR..
whats everyone's thought on that?
whats everyone's thought on that?
8
Posted on 2/25/10 at 4:55 pm to seinfeldtiger
Good move IMO.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 4:56 pm to seinfeldtiger
is he not like 6'4 260ish and an edge rusher?
Posted on 2/25/10 at 4:56 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
How big is he now?
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:00 pm to seinfeldtiger
As long as he plays, I'm good.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:03 pm to seinfeldtiger
quote:
How big is he now?
99 Sam Montgomery DE 6-4 240 Fr. RS Greenwood, S.C. (Greenwood HS)
LSU roster
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:05 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
They need to move Brockers to DT and leave Sam at DE. Sam is a quick pass-rushing DE.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:06 pm to seinfeldtiger
quote:
Possibly moving inside to DT according to TR..
whats everyone's thought on that?
They are retarded then and suck at puttin the right guy in the right position.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:08 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
TigersOfGeauxld
quote:wtf?
Good move IMO.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:11 pm to Books
quote:
Sam Montgomery???
quote:
TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Good move IMO.
wtf?
Point out where I said "Play him NOW!"
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:13 pm to Books
quote:
Books
Its like clockwork. You were here in no time.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:14 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
why would it be a good move? And whoever wrote that for TR is an idiot and confused Montgomery w/ Brockers
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:19 pm to Books
quote:
why would it be a good move?
Because we're thin at DT, and he has the frame to bulk up. Scouts were projecting him as a DT when he was recruited. And I think we've got some better prospect at DE now like Ego Ferguson.
Just like Peterson at TE, no one expects him to jump right in at DT.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:20 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
who projected montgomery as a fricking dt?
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:21 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Scouts were projecting him as a DT when he was recruited.
which scouts?
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:21 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:he still needs to bulk up to play DE
Because we're thin at DT, and he has the frame to bulk up.
quote:no
Scouts were projecting him as a DT when he was recruited
quote:that's one guy that hasnt played a snap
And I think we've got some better prospect at DE now like Ego Ferguson.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:21 pm to seinfeldtiger
WHAT
THE
frick
THE
frick
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:23 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:You sure?
Scouts were projecting him as a DT when he was recruited.
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:23 pm to Books
quote:
And I think we've got some better prospect at DE now like Ego Ferguson.
quote:Freak Johnson is going to come in and start next year.
that's one guy that hasnt played a snap
Posted on 2/25/10 at 5:24 pm to BilJ
quote:
that's one guy that hasnt played a snap
so freshman shouldnt take their first snap?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News