Started By
Message

re: Sam Montgomery Status for 2011???

Posted on 2/3/11 at 4:52 pm to
Posted by byubengalboy
Cypress, tx.
Member since Nov 2008
3719 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

I could be totally wrong here but I am pretty sure it was a legal block. They guy went low at his legs. Now was it a dirty block? I think any time you go low at someones legs, it is dirty to me. They should change the rules completely, no going down at someones legs. I know it would be hard to police, but so many lineman get injured when they are block low(the knees or lower). Just my two cents.


I don't know if he was totally engaged but a tenn. olineman had his arm either on him or fending and had his attention when the back cut his knees head on. the ref's didn't throw a flag (gee, what a surprise) but the block was dirty and cost him what was shaping up to be a very big year. jmho.

Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
76042 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 4:54 pm to
It really is amazing how far knee surgery has come. Look at how great a recovery Ridley made after being hurt in the spring game. two years ago. He player the next season
Posted by Lsuman122
Bossier City, LA
Member since Aug 2010
661 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

I could be totally wrong here but I am pretty sure it was a legal block. They guy went low at his legs. Now was it a dirty block? I think any time you go low at someones legs, it is dirty to me. They should change the rules completely, no going down at someones legs. I know it would be hard to police, but so many lineman get injured when they are block low(the knees or lower). Just my two cents.


No, already too many contact affiliated rules.
Posted by BTRDD
Member since Jun 2009
3599 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

No, already too many contact affiliated rules.


That hit was a split second from being an illegal hit. Montgomery wasn't "engaged" with the OLineman, but he was faced up to him when Poole launched himself into the knee. If you aren't one on one with the player, that block shouldn't be allowed.
Posted by yungtigr
Dallas, TX
Member since Jan 2005
3820 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 7:00 pm to
Getting him and Taylor back certainly helps to soften the blow of the big three losses on the D a little bit.
Posted by Noplacelikehome
Member since Oct 2010
2154 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

I agree. I saw Sam on campus the other day... It is a scary thought to imagine someone that big running that fast. No doubt he can motor, but if the 4.49 is true - that is impressive.


Dwight Freeney ran a 4.48 at the combine at 6'1 266.

Julius Peppers ran a 4.68 at 6'7 280 at his pro day.

If Mongomery ran a 4.49 at 6'4 250 then you have to put him in the same class (speed wise) as Peppers and Freeney and those 2 guys can fricken move.
This post was edited on 2/3/11 at 8:01 pm
Posted by jtran1988
Corndog U
Member since Oct 2008
5470 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 8:01 pm to
Montgomery has gotten 2 more years to play too.. he can only be better.. and faster.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
452343 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

Dwight Freeney ran a 4.48 at the combine at 6'1 266.

i don't know if he ran at the combine, but he ran a sub 4.4 at his pro day

quote:

Julius Peppers ran a 4.68 at 6'7 280 at his pro day.

he didn't run THAT well

but mario williams ran a 4.66 at 290+

Posted by Noplacelikehome
Member since Oct 2010
2154 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 8:17 pm to
2002: Dwight Freeney, Syracuse -- Colts (1st round, No. 11 overall)

Freeney is a great example of how an experienced general manager can sift through the combine and find gold. He is not prototypical in all of the measurables. He is not small, but he is short (6-1). However, the Colts realized a 4.48 40-yard dash time, 37-inch vertical leap and 28 reps of 225 pounds on the bench press were terrific numbers for a 266-pound man. Because of his combine workout, Freeney skyrocketed to the 11th pick and has been a standout for the Colts.

They average out the 2 40 times that the players run and Williams ran a 4.7. Williams is also 6'7.
This post was edited on 2/3/11 at 8:21 pm
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
23620 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 8:28 pm to
Let's just say Montgomery ran a sub 4.5 40 prior to the Tennessee game. That's incredible for a 245 lb. DE.

But you're asking me to believe he accomplished this three months post-op from ACL surgery.

I thought SM was the most outstanding performer on the DL up to the point of his injury, and I'm looking forward to him getting back to 100%, but as an ACL replacement recipient, I can tell you this reported time is otherwordly.

Someone is prone to exaggeration.
Posted by TG
Metairie
Member since Sep 2004
3132 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:17 pm to
He should return this fall, but don't expect him at 100% until the following season.
Posted by lesgeaux
Member since Jul 2008
3746 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 9:38 pm to
"Sam Montgomery WILL NOT PLAY NEXT WEEK cause he's injured! He got CHOP-BLOCKED!" :fearthehat:
Posted by Mike Linebacker
Texas
Member since Sep 2009
3404 posts
Posted on 2/3/11 at 10:16 pm to
If he's running sub 4.5 forties, this will be his last year in BR
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
172490 posts
Posted on 2/4/11 at 4:08 am to
quote:

He got CHOP-BLOCKED!

Good call, Les.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
30923 posts
Posted on 2/4/11 at 7:15 am to
quote:

as an ACL replacement recipient, I can tell you this reported time is otherwordly.


And SM's surgeon would tell you that it generally takes 2 years to get all your speed back (witness Ridley this season 2 years after his repair)
Posted by mule74
Watersound Beach
Member since Nov 2004
11854 posts
Posted on 2/4/11 at 8:06 am to
quote:

And SM's surgeon would tell you that it generally takes 2 years to get all your speed back (witness Ridley this season 2 years after his repair)


I've been really telling people to temper there expectation from Sam this year. I think he can be the player he was but I'd really expect to see him back in peak form in 2012.
Posted by Nissanmaxima
Member since Feb 2006
14928 posts
Posted on 2/4/11 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Montgomery has gotten 2 more years to play too.. he can only be better.. and faster.



Has gotten 2 more years to play? Will he receive a medical red shirt from the past year? If not, he will be a Sophomore right? So, 3 years to play still.
Posted by mule74
Watersound Beach
Member since Nov 2004
11854 posts
Posted on 2/4/11 at 8:12 am to
quote:


Montgomery has gotten 2 more years to play too.. he can only be better.. and faster.


????
Posted by Third Degrre Bern
Member since Dec 2010
652 posts
Posted on 2/4/11 at 8:16 am to
We should do a little of launching on Poole's knee in Sept.!
Posted by abear75
New Iberia
Member since Jun 2009
107 posts
Posted on 2/4/11 at 9:20 am to
if a stop watch was used then you have to add .24 seconds to his time which puts it at 4.73 which still fast for that size.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram