Started By
Message

Ross Dellinger on new SEC football schedule options

Posted on 2/10/23 at 2:49 pm
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
890 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 2:49 pm
This article explains the issues facing the conference regarding scheduling and the pros and cons of both the 8-game and 9-game conference schedule. At the conclusion, he lays out his first stab at the 3 permanent opponents for each team in a 9-game schedule.

LINK
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
85797 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 2:54 pm to
miss-clicked
This post was edited on 2/10/23 at 2:57 pm
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
20256 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Several months ago, we took our best guess at the three permanent opponents for each team. We based these on three things: (1) primary and secondary rivalries; (2) geography; and (3) creating as much equity as possible.

Alabama: Auburn; Tennessee; LSU
Arkansas: Missouri; Texas; Kentucky
Auburn: Alabama; Georgia; South Carolina
Florida: Georgia; South Carolina; Oklahoma
Georgia: Auburn; Florida; Kentucky
Kentucky: Mississippi State; Arkansas; Georgia
LSU: Ole Miss; Texas A&M; Alabama
Mississippi State: Ole Miss; Kentucky; Texas A&M
Missouri: Oklahoma; Arkansas; Vanderbilt
Oklahoma: Texas; Missouri; Florida
Ole Miss: Mississippi State; LSU; Vanderbilt
South Carolina: Florida; Auburn; Tennessee
Tennessee: Vanderbilt; Alabama; South Carolina
Texas: Oklahoma; Texas A&M; Arkansas
Texas A&M: LSU; Texas; Mississippi State
Vanderbilt: Tennessee; Ole Miss; Missouri

And now, let the bickering begin!




I bolded the ones that I think are a given.
This post was edited on 2/10/23 at 3:04 pm
Posted by 225rumpshaker
Texas
Member since Sep 2006
8743 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 2:58 pm to
I would laugh a lot at Aggie being forced into playing Texas every year.

Other than that meh
Posted by crazyLSUstudent
391 miles away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2012
5515 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 2:58 pm to
south carolina really getting the shaft with that one.
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
20256 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:00 pm to
I really don't think Alabama will have to play LSU after already playing Auburn and Tennessee.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77580 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:02 pm to
They absolutely wont kill LSU/Bama, especially with Kelly in the league.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26579 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:03 pm to
This will be incredibly unpopular, but I would be just fine with 0 permanent opponents.
Posted by mikedatyger
Orlandeaux, FL
Member since Jun 2005
4011 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:13 pm to
Probably not a popular opinion, but I really liked the initial pod idea.
The suggested format (3-6 model) looks better IF they play the 9-game conference schedule.

Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11096 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:15 pm to
It would piss me off if that's what they didn't do
Posted by MichiganTiger
Where Global Warming is Welcomed!
Member since Dec 2004
7786 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:21 pm to
Like Ole Miss’ schedule. One rough game…then State & Vandy every year.
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
23027 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:26 pm to
Would suck to get stuck with aggie every year

Dealing with those weirdos is one of the worst things to ever happen to this conference.
Posted by Cheesy Beaver
Kenna brah
Member since Dec 2014
4424 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Several months ago, we took our best guess at the three permanent opponents for each team. We based these on three things: (1) primary and secondary rivalries; (2) geography; and (3) creating as much equity as possible.

Alabama: Auburn; Tennessee; LSU
Arkansas: Missouri; Texas; Kentucky
Auburn: Alabama; Georgia; South Carolina
Florida: Georgia; South Carolina; Oklahoma
Georgia: Auburn; Florida; Kentucky
Kentucky: Mississippi State; Arkansas; Georgia
LSU: Ole Miss; Texas A&M; Alabama
Mississippi State: Ole Miss; Kentucky; Texas A&M
Missouri: Oklahoma; Arkansas; Vanderbilt
Oklahoma: Texas; Missouri; Florida
Ole Miss: Mississippi State; LSU; Vanderbilt
South Carolina: Florida; Auburn; Tennessee
Tennessee: Vanderbilt; Alabama; South Carolina
Texas: Oklahoma; Texas A&M; Arkansas
Texas A&M: LSU; Texas; Mississippi State
Vanderbilt: Tennessee; Ole Miss; Missouri

And now, let the bickering begin!



no matter how they split this, some school is inevitably going to get a really easy draw and some school is going to get an unfairly cruel draw.

let's just hope LSU is somewhere in the middle. auburn/bama, moo state/ole miss, texas/A&M/Arkansas i'd be fine with.
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
10145 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:35 pm to
i hate losing florida if that is our pod.
Posted by searcyagent
Little Rock
Member since Sep 2015
141 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 3:42 pm to
OU/Texas/Arkansas/Mizzou
LSU/aTm/Ole Miss/Miss State
Tenn/Bama/Auburn/Vandy
KY/Fla/GA/South Carolina
Posted by WDAIII
Member since Aug 2020
3119 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 4:01 pm to
I hope we get rid of Texas A&M as a permanent opponent. That’s a horrible road trip
Posted by InCaliForNow
Member since Mar 2014
469 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 4:07 pm to
Dellinger raises a good point when he says,

quote:

While Texas and Oklahoma have reshuffled the hierarchy deck a bit, most within the conference would consider the top half Alabama, LSU, Auburn, Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Georgia and Florida. The bottom would be Tennessee (in many ways, the Vols are caught between the two), South Carolina, Arkansas, Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Mississippi State and Missouri.


If the league gets a bit more granular with four tiers:

1. Alabama, LSU, Oklahoma, Georgia
2. Auburn, Texas, Texas A&M, Florida
3. Tennessee, South Carolina, Arkansas, Ole Miss
4. Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Mississippi State Missouri

Then competitive balance could work this way:

Tier 1 plays: Another Tier 1 plus Tier 2 and Tier 3
Tier 2 plays: Another Tier 2 plus Tier 1 and Tier 4
Tier 3 plays: Another Tier 3 plus Tier 1 and Tier 4
Tier 4 plays: Another Tier 4 plus Tier 2 and Tier 3

The top tier seems clear.

The other tiers not so much.

The league could adjust the tiers based on something measurable every four or every eight years.

All or at least most rivalries would be maintained unless something happened (for example) where Tennessee was Tier 1 and Vanderbilt was Tier 4.



Posted by Relham10
Ridge
Member since Jan 2013
15617 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 4:12 pm to
Interested to see where this ends but if I'd take a guess. For no particular reason but a guess.

Id say lsu permanent oppts:
Ole miss, arkansas and texas a&m
Or
Ole miss, state and texas a&m
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41899 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

They absolutely wont kill LSU/Bama, especially with Kelly in the league.


AU and Tenn will be locks

With that scenario, could definitely see Bama not wanting LSU as 3rd.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
23965 posts
Posted on 2/10/23 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

This will be incredibly unpopular, but I would be just fine with 0 permanent opponents.



Agreed. Everyone is going to be pissed if they round peg in square hole this thing, and really that is what they will have to do.

The Pods are interesting but same same.

0 permanent opponents is fair AND you will still have the big rivalry games just not every year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram