- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rewatching the Fiesta Bowl - Thoughts on Burrow.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:37 am to mhc4tigers
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:37 am to mhc4tigers
quote:
Burrow made plays that Etling could not dream of making
CaptainPanic is always melting down, don't respond to him/her.
0
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:43 am to mhc4tigers
quote:
Stats are extremely deceptive
Posted on 6/21/19 at 10:57 am to Odysseus32
Central Florida 
Posted on 6/21/19 at 3:02 pm to mhc4tigers
quote:Nothing deceptive about 153RAT > 133RAT, or 60% > 59% and everything else is pure conjecture.
Stats are extremely deceptive.Burrow made plays that Etling could not dream of making. With Etling we lose to Auburn and probably Miss StAte.
I think Joe is a great competitor and more athletic. He still has 2019 to top Danny Boy and this will reveal the answer.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 7:40 pm to Mayhawman
Stats are deceptive...Burrow threw a ton of catchable balls that were dropped this past season.
More than I can remember in a long time.
More than I can remember in a long time.
Posted on 6/21/19 at 9:46 pm to munchman
Muh O-line
NB4 Buckeyejeaux starts slamming another stat site.
All Nov '18 except I added Danny's slightly better drop rate from 2017 in fairness.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 7:46 am to Mayhawman
Again stats are misleading.
Who gets to determine what is catchable and what’s not.
Who gets to determine what is catchable and what’s not.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 8:13 am to munchman
More O pumpers rejecting statistics and data because it doesn’t sit well with their preferred viewpoint.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 8:13 am to Mayhawman
CFB Film Room is a fan site. The stats come from anonymous fans. Pretty much anyone can watch games and post stats there.
As if Damone, Ricky, Lunitik, Goldrush, etc sent in their stats.
This site was debunked a couple years ago. Sorry. Zero credibility.
As if Damone, Ricky, Lunitik, Goldrush, etc sent in their stats.
This site was debunked a couple years ago. Sorry. Zero credibility.
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 9:47 am
Posted on 6/22/19 at 8:21 am to Damone
quote:
More O pumpers rejecting statistics and data because it doesn’t sit well with their preferred viewpoint.
YOU too can be an instant statistician! - On their home page, at top right, click, sign up, and you're in!
[Their newest article is from December 2018. And their second-newest article is from September of 2018]
LINK
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 8:28 am
Posted on 6/22/19 at 8:25 am to Buckeye Jeaux
We’ve been citing Football Outsiders, Weirdo Joe (Ree). What other data and statistics do you purposefully ignore?
Posted on 6/22/19 at 8:31 am to Damone
quote:
We’ve been citing Football Outsiders
Directly above, you are pimping for (chuckle) CFB Film Room - debunked on Big-10 websites in 2017
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 8:32 am
Posted on 6/22/19 at 8:46 am to Odysseus32
Joe Burrow is a fricking soldier
Posted on 6/22/19 at 10:30 am to earl keese
quote:
And some that weren't. #33 - Alabama #50 - UCF #58 - Auburn
You can’t go by rankings. Teams that are easy to run on are “good” statistically against the pass. That’s because no one bothers to throw on them much. I promise Bama was one of the top five teams defending the pass. But no one could run on them, so they threw the ball a lot. Thus Bama’s pass defense stats look mediocre. But the reality is the emphases on passing led to sacks and fumbles that don’t show in the passing stats.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 11:07 am to Penrod
quote:Good points. Also, teams that score much more than the norm are at a disadvantage in the D rankings.
You can’t go by rankings. Teams that are easy to run on are “good” statistically against the pass.
Look at teams that score 8 times a game vs teams that score 4. That's 4 additional possessions for the opponent. That's the same as 4 turnovers. (Also, teams who play high scoring programs are forced to throw the ball more.)
Extra possession affect passing and total defense rankings.
The average number of possessions is 12. Four more is 33.3%. So 300 yards of total defense ranks 10th best. Add 33.3% and you're at 400 yards of total defense. That is a 68th place ranking.
Also barely mid-major teams are lumped in with ranked teams. Makes no sense. Bowling Greens pass D is top-10?
This post was edited on 6/22/19 at 11:11 am
Posted on 6/22/19 at 11:09 am to Buckeye Jeaux
You can post all the stats you want from LAST YEAR.... they mean nothing for this upcoming year... not a thing......
Posted on 6/22/19 at 11:11 am to dukke v
quote:Thanks for the news flash, Dookie.
You can post all the stats you want from LAST YEAR.... they mean nothing for this upcoming year... not a thing......
Posted on 6/22/19 at 11:16 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Look at teams that score 8 times a game vs teams that score 4. That's 4 additional possessions for the opponent. That's the same as 4 turnovers
It’s not 4 additional possessions. If those drives didn’t end in a score they would have ended with a punt or turnover, which also would have given the ball back to the other team.
Pace is what puts them at a disadvantage and leads to additional possessions.
Posted on 6/22/19 at 11:25 am to Buckeye Jeaux
And Burrow is NOT throwing for 3,500 yards this season......
Posted on 6/22/19 at 11:26 am to MOT
He doesn’t understand football much... give him a break.
Page 8 of 14
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News