- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:21 pm to LSULaw2009
quote:so being that the MAC gets a waiver, what would lead you to believe that it is improbable that the SEC would?
I know what provisional means, and usually it involves something that is actually probable.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:23 pm to bee Rye
quote:
so being that the MAC gets a waiver, what would lead you to believe that it is improbable that the SEC would?

Sounds like y'all are talking about 2 different things.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:24 pm to junkfunky
quote:
Sounds like y'all are talking about 2 different things.
that schedule may be total BS, but not because of the non round robin format.
the waiver is a mere formality.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:28 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
that schedule may be total BS, but not because of the non round robin format.
I agree with that. If it were provisional according to the SEC it wouldn't be on a spreadsheet presented in that format.
quote:
the waiver is a mere formality.
Agreed.
I think LSULaw's last statement was saying the schedule was not provisional. Nothing to do with the waiver. He seemed to back away from that argument.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:30 pm to junkfunky
quote:thats his original comment, pretty clear we were talking about the same thing
Sounds like y'all are talking about 2 different things.
quote:
Why would the SEC schedule games so they have to ask for something there is a possibility that wouldn't be granted?
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:31 pm to junkfunky
quote:meh, read the comments in order again, if he backed away, he did a poor job of doing it
I think LSULaw's last statement was saying the schedule was not provisional. Nothing to do with the waiver. He seemed to back away from that argument.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:33 pm to bee Rye
never said waiver wouldn't happen, just questioned the validity of the schedule since the SEC can potentially schedule without need for waiver.
With the NCAA waivers, no matter how trivial, are never an absolute given.
With the NCAA waivers, no matter how trivial, are never an absolute given.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:38 pm to bee Rye
I think it happens like this...
Every SEC team will have to drop an OOC team.
Texas A&M will play all 12 sec teams and be ineligible for SEC championship.
Team #14 brought in to balance divisions in 2013.
Every SEC team will have to drop an OOC team.
Texas A&M will play all 12 sec teams and be ineligible for SEC championship.
Team #14 brought in to balance divisions in 2013.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:42 pm to bee Rye
Don't see them making us play three straight road games. I don't care who it is. 

Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:43 pm to tigabait01
quote:
Every SEC team will have to drop an OOC team.
Texas A&M will play all 12 sec teams and be ineligible for SEC championship.
fairly certain all this is less likely than that shitty schedule posted in the OP
Posted on 9/27/11 at 5:46 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
they are a lot better than miss state
Not next season, they lose a lot.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 6:20 pm to Tigerbait337
South carolina would drop off, not msu.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 9:55 pm to bee Rye
It's time to move the ole miss game back to halloween and texas a&m to before Arkansas
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:09 pm to jcole4lsu
quote:
sec office really does hate lsu. take a team off the schedule that hasnt beat us twice in 20 years and replace them with a top 10 team.
frick you slive
If true, this would suck big.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:17 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
But to hang us with Florida for 20 freakin' years (and lately, they may feel the same way about us)
I've always been surprised this doesn't get more play from our fanbase. I don't think people really get how unfair this has been for LSU...us moreso than Florida lately since the east has been down compared to the west. To win a NC schedule is a HUGE factor and that cannot be overstated. What it basically means is that in any championship year LSU will have to beat AL, AUB, ARk. AND FLA....and in some year USC and GA will both be on the schedule too.
I would LOVE to trade either Tenn or Ga for Fla as our permanent opponent. I know teams cycle up and down...but the state of Fla has more D-1 recruits than any other state and on average Fla will always be stronger than Tenn or Ga. Its just not fair that our biggest rival in the West, Bama, gets to play one less really tough game than us EVERY YEAR just so Ala and Tenn can maintain their rivalry. If they want it that bad I say just put them in the same division.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 10:22 pm to tigabait01
quote:
Texas A&M will play all 12 sec teams and be ineligible for SEC championship.
You must not have seen the press conference at A&M yesterday. They will be treated exactly as every other member starting day 1.
The schedule will be unbalanced with 13 teams. It is simple math. You can either have some teams play a different number of conference games, or you can have every team play the same number of conference games but a different number of divisional games. While not ideal, it makes more sense to play the same number of conference games, which is what the schedule being discussed accomplishes.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 11:00 pm to bee Rye
do yalll think sec/ncaa is thinking death penalty for auburn?
this would even things out.
this would even things out.
Posted on 9/27/11 at 11:02 pm to blackjackjackson
quote:
do yalll think sec/ncaa is thinking death penalty for auburn?
this would even things out.
Thought never crossed my mind, but interesting nonetheless.
Back to top
