- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: President Rousse statement
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:02 am to tigerfan88
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:02 am to tigerfan88
quote:
Sankey was aware of the rule in general but had never read the language in the official rule book which didn’t have any language excluding 2022 players.
So basically Sankey said “SEC rules say that you have to follow NCAA official rules” and then they caught him on cross examination because the official rules don’t say anything about excluding the 2022 class from 5-5.
Right, if you were getting paid 4.8 million dollars a year, don't you think that you would MAYBE be insanely familiar with each and every nuance of the rule that you know is going to be hammered at a court hearing, in every iteration? I think that would be the bare minimum expectation
0
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:21 am to Big4SALTbro
quote:
The goal should be to have that dropped by the sec. It’s an incredibly dumb move for a conference to sue a member following a court order.
Technically, they sued before the court order.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:30 am to lsupride87
The ncaa changed the rules late in the game to give these players another year of eligibility not LSU.
Horrible to go after the wrong entity. SEC looks as bad as the ncaa.
Horrible to go after the wrong entity. SEC looks as bad as the ncaa.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News