- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Potential BCS NC scenario (for the hell of it)...
Posted on 10/2/12 at 8:59 pm to teeMike
Posted on 10/2/12 at 8:59 pm to teeMike
quote:
The hell I can't. Name me anyone who doesn't get upset at being called an "idiot". I may not have the greatest knowledge of the BCS voting system but nothing merits calling anyone an "idiot" in my circle.
This is the interwebz, get thicker skin, or get smarter about a shitty thread. If you can't do either GTFO.... Idiot.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 10:55 pm to teeMike
If those 4 run the table...your final BCS ranking would be
1) LSU
2) Oregon
3) ND
4) FSU
LSU has easily the toughest schedule and noone would give two shits about closer than desired wins in September. LSU would have wins over 4 top 10 teams at that point (UF, SC, Bama, and SECe champ). It wouldn't even be close.
The big debate would be between ND and Oregon, but with the downslide of the Big 10 and Stanford and USC with both 2 losses, it would be pretty tight between those 2 teams. Probably come down to human polls and with common opponents of USC and Stanford the human polls would probably have a big enough gap to determine the #2 team.
FSU's schedule is far and away too weak compared to the other 3 to even come close.
1) LSU
2) Oregon
3) ND
4) FSU
LSU has easily the toughest schedule and noone would give two shits about closer than desired wins in September. LSU would have wins over 4 top 10 teams at that point (UF, SC, Bama, and SECe champ). It wouldn't even be close.
The big debate would be between ND and Oregon, but with the downslide of the Big 10 and Stanford and USC with both 2 losses, it would be pretty tight between those 2 teams. Probably come down to human polls and with common opponents of USC and Stanford the human polls would probably have a big enough gap to determine the #2 team.
FSU's schedule is far and away too weak compared to the other 3 to even come close.
This post was edited on 10/2/12 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 10/2/12 at 11:02 pm to teeMike
You can get pissed all you want, but you asked a dumb question, some called you an idiot, others answered your dumb question repeatedly, you got mad about being called an idiot, and continued to ask the dumb question.
Idiot.
Idiot.
Posted on 10/2/12 at 11:20 pm to Fishhead
In the event you're serious, and not trolling:
the SEC is coming off 6 consecutive BCS titles, and the only SEC team to lose in the game was beaten by another SEC team. Sure, the nation-at-large wants someone else to win, but not by excluding the SEC. They want someone to beat "us".
I would state this: I think it's more likely that Miss St could run the table and finish in the top 2, from where they are ranked right now, than it is that LSU (ranked #4 and a preseason favorite) would run the table and finish at #3 or below.
An SEC team will be in if at all possible, because they haven't been beaten on the field. At this point it's considered relevant history, and the voters will make it happen until and unless we finally lose in the big game.
the SEC is coming off 6 consecutive BCS titles, and the only SEC team to lose in the game was beaten by another SEC team. Sure, the nation-at-large wants someone else to win, but not by excluding the SEC. They want someone to beat "us".
I would state this: I think it's more likely that Miss St could run the table and finish in the top 2, from where they are ranked right now, than it is that LSU (ranked #4 and a preseason favorite) would run the table and finish at #3 or below.
An SEC team will be in if at all possible, because they haven't been beaten on the field. At this point it's considered relevant history, and the voters will make it happen until and unless we finally lose in the big game.
Popular
Back to top

0





