1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:26 am to BugAC
I think the SEC accepted this possibility as the lesser of two evils. If they allowed the players to play when they said no originally, they’d look as weak as the NCAA. A few million in NIL damages is nothing compared to the power and perception the SEC is trying to keep.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:35 am to LVag1997
The soccer player in question appeared in 3 games, but hasnt played in any games since September 6 according to stats and game logs on the LSU athletic department website.
September 8 is when the SEC scheduled the meeting to vote on expelling LSU. LSU backed down on the soccer player too once the SEC threats got serious.
September 8 is when the SEC scheduled the meeting to vote on expelling LSU. LSU backed down on the soccer player too once the SEC threats got serious.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 9:58 am to JudgeHolden
Dude, stfu. No one values your opinion, and they value SFPs even less. Im not a Lawyer...i do know business law, but not claiming to be an expert. Common sense rules here. You dont get that apparently.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:12 am to SlowFlowPro
Because he has made the SEC look very bad, and will likely cost the SEC, and possibly LSU and Sankey, $$.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:18 am to Tiger Voodoo
You have formulated the best response to this issue I have seen or heard.
quote:+1000
This isn’t difficult to grasp for anyone that doesn’t just want to argue or be contrarian.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:23 am to Pedropatterstine
quote:Well, we are discussion a legal issue here.
i do know business law, but not claiming to be an expert. Common sense rules here. You dont get that apparently.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:28 am to Thorny
quote:This is SFPs superpower.
how diligent he was in ignoring them.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:30 am to Pedropatterstine
quote:
No one values your opinion
Then don't.
In other news, the actual motion filed by Pyburn and the other plaintiffs is STILL not available on the EBR Clerk's website. I may walk down there at lunch to take a look at the actual filing.
It is a little odd that the image is not live three days after filing. That is slow even for EBR.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:32 am to LSUnKaty
What legal issue?
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:35 am to themunch
quote:Huh?
What legal issue?
The literal thread heading
quote:
Players file motion for contempt against Sankey, SEC, and LSU
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:41 am to LSUnKaty
I thought you were referring to something other.
Posted on 10/8/26 at 10:41 am to JudgeHolden
Thanks Judge
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News