- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Once again posters on The Rant were correct in assessment of a player - Lloyd Cushenberry
Posted on 9/19/18 at 8:18 am to BayouBengal99
Posted on 9/19/18 at 8:18 am to BayouBengal99
Holy wall of melt, Batman.
IS this where you pretend like there was a reason to just assume this team would start 3-0 other than blind homerism?
quote:
had no clue where this program was
IS this where you pretend like there was a reason to just assume this team would start 3-0 other than blind homerism?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 8:38 am to LNCHBOX
Well if you paid any attention to last year we lost by a few FGs to 2 teams and while one team was supposed to be below LSUs standards, they were a good team and LSU was trying to figure out who they were as a team.
So if you don't go all bitch mode all season and offseason you would have seen that there was a great chance that LSU would respond this year being how we ended the year full of team leadership and you would have also seen all the changes that were installed.
All the upgrades. Burrow/Tracy/Fehoko/Giles/Analyst/ST coach/DL depth/LB depth/WR depth/OL depth/Fulton. When you combine these additions to what we were doing at the end of last year and if you weren't completely blind with hate for our HC then you would have seen that there was a very good chance all the talk was complete and utter nonsense.
If you want to call that blind homerism then so be it. If that makes you feel better. I know what I saw last year and it wasn't bad coaching. Carry on.
So if you don't go all bitch mode all season and offseason you would have seen that there was a great chance that LSU would respond this year being how we ended the year full of team leadership and you would have also seen all the changes that were installed.
All the upgrades. Burrow/Tracy/Fehoko/Giles/Analyst/ST coach/DL depth/LB depth/WR depth/OL depth/Fulton. When you combine these additions to what we were doing at the end of last year and if you weren't completely blind with hate for our HC then you would have seen that there was a very good chance all the talk was complete and utter nonsense.
If you want to call that blind homerism then so be it. If that makes you feel better. I know what I saw last year and it wasn't bad coaching. Carry on.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 8:43 am to BayouBengal99
quote:
Well if you paid any attention to last year we lost by a few FGs to 2 teams and while one team was supposed to be below LSUs standards, they were a good team and LSU was trying to figure out who they were as a team.
I'ms o fricking tired of trying to justify the Troy loss. It makes it impossible to take anything you say seriously.
quote:
So if you don't go all bitch mode all season and offseason you would have seen that there was a great chance that LSU would respond this year being how we ended the year full of team leadership and you would have also seen all the changes that were installed.
OR we could look to the facts that we lost almost all of our offensive production, replaced our OC with someone that hasn't done it for a long time, have a brutal schedule, etc.
quote:
When you combine these additions to what we were doing at the end of last year and if you weren't completely blind with hate for our HC then you would have seen that there was a very good chance all the talk was complete and utter nonsense.
The end of the year was losing a shitty game to ND that we had no business losing.
quote:
If you want to call that blind homerism then so be it. If that makes you feel better. I know what I saw last year and it wasn't bad coaching. Carry on.
If that makes you feel better about it, sure. Last year was chock full of bad coaching from September to through the bowl game.
This year has been better, but it doesn't change last year.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:19 am to p&g
quote:
Really weird and sad you’d go back a year on a someone’s post history to see when they posted.
No one needs to go back through post history to remember Ree being MIA.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:31 am to Tiger Ree
You really think all of those are attacking Cushenberry?


Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:34 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:
You really think all of those are attacking Cushenberry
I didn’t read the thread but what do you think the ones he quoted are saying ?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:36 am to BayouBengal99
We beat Auburn last year when they were healthy. Auburn beat both Georgia and Alabama when they were healthy. Unfortunately they lost their best running back late in the Alabama game. Then Auburn lost to Georgia in the SEC Championship game.
We played Alabama pretty close last season. More total yds, if I remember correctly.
No reason to be optimistic preseason? The evidence was there for optimism, if you cared to evaluate the evidence instead of focusing on the "black cloud" narrative.
We played Alabama pretty close last season. More total yds, if I remember correctly.
No reason to be optimistic preseason? The evidence was there for optimism, if you cared to evaluate the evidence instead of focusing on the "black cloud" narrative.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:36 am to Lester Earl
quote:
I didn’t read the thread but what do you think the ones he quoted are saying ?
The first two certainly weren't attacking him. And frankly I don't find saying a player sucks to be attacking him if his play warrants it. SO it would depend on when those posts were made for me.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:37 am to Gus007
quote:
We played Alabama pretty close last season.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:38 am to Lester Earl
quote:
LSUANDY25
Coach speak - Lets see
Saddiq Charles getting better every week really means came in out of shape.
Brumfield Experienced leader really means vocal guy
Cushenberry - iS very smart- really means lacking physical traits
The guy is guessing what coach speak means. Hardly an attack.
quote:
2003tigerfan
Whenever someone mentions Cushenberry, It always followed by how smart he is. No one has ever said he can't block ,but it's about putting the 5 best blockers on the field
Again, this guy is just saying he is weary that people only talk about his intelligence. Definitely didn't say he sucked. Hardly an attack.
quote:
The Baker
That could either mean Traore has stepped up
Or
Cushenberry sucks
Again, guessing why shifts were made to the line. And gave two options for why it could have happened. Hardly an attack.
quote:
ROPO
Or
Cushenberry sucks
Same as above.
It is people speculating why changes were being made. They aren't saying they watched Cushenberry play and think his play sucks.
Calling these attacks on a player is a fricking joke Lester. Do you always have to play this character on here?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:53 am to TheCaterpillar
Nice twisting you’re doing there buddy. You’re right no one questioned Cushenberry
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:53 am to Lester Earl
quote:
You’re right no one questioned Cushenberry
The question was whether he was attacked. Speaking of twisting...
Posted on 9/19/18 at 9:54 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Nice twisting you’re doing there buddy. You’re right no one questioned Cushenberry
I said the ones I quoted weren't attacking Cushenberry.
I never said no one was questioning Cushenberry.
I swear sometime in the last year or so you hit your head on something.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:01 am to TheCaterpillar
He was a little dramatic with his wording but the point he was trying to make is pretty clear.
Our fans have been generally clueless when it comes to our OL coming into the season. Our new OL coach has been mocked, our depth has been called shite, our players have been hated on. I’m not trying to get stuck on a word for the sake of arguing
We have a starter suspended, yet have still have to play 8 lineman thru 3 games. We’ve basically proven we can be 2 deep across The line. The line is definitely improving & a lot of people were wrong about our guys, esp Cushenberry.
Our fans have been generally clueless when it comes to our OL coming into the season. Our new OL coach has been mocked, our depth has been called shite, our players have been hated on. I’m not trying to get stuck on a word for the sake of arguing
We have a starter suspended, yet have still have to play 8 lineman thru 3 games. We’ve basically proven we can be 2 deep across The line. The line is definitely improving & a lot of people were wrong about our guys, esp Cushenberry.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 10:02 am
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:04 am to Lester Earl
And for all of that we still suck on 3rd down and have trouble moving the ball, even against FCS teams. Yea, we're winning, but it;s not like we have some dominating offense that warrants an I told you so. Not yet.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:07 am to Lester Earl
quote:
He was a little dramatic with his wording
He wasn't just dramatic, he was incorrect with his wording and that was my whole point.
Nothing less, nothing more.
He does this all the time.
quote:
I’m not trying to get stuck on a word for the sake of arguing
That's exactly what you did. I told Tiger Ree he was wrong about Cushenberry being "attacked" and you injected yourself into that discussion.
I think incorrectly spreading a bullshite narrative that a player is being "attacked" by our fans is not fair and not helpful.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:10 am to Gus007
quote:
No reason to be optimistic preseason? The evidence was there for optimism, if you cared to evaluate the evidence instead of focusing on the "black cloud" narrative.
quote:
BayouBengal99
You are talking to the most positive poster on this board.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:17 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
And for all of that we still suck on 3rd down and have trouble moving the ball, even against FCS teams. Yea, we're winning, but it;s not like we have some dominating offense that warrants an I told you so. Not yet.
Talking about the line here. It’s clear to see they took a big jump at auburn against a much better front than either of the other 2 teams we’ve played
Posted on 9/19/18 at 10:18 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Talking about the line here. It’s clear to see they took a big jump at auburn against a much better front than either of the other 2 teams we’ve played
So that makes their past performances go away? This thread is very stupid based on what we had actually seen on the field. No one is surprised that you're going to defend it relentless though.
Popular
Back to top


1



