- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official: LSU and Woodward parting ways
Posted on 11/1/25 at 10:10 am to VOR
Posted on 11/1/25 at 10:10 am to VOR
quote:
The contract was not ridiculous at the time. Kelly was not going to come cheap…
If it takes ten years $100 million to hire a geezer who has never won anything then don’t hire Kelly.
It’s not like the fanbase was begging for Kelly.
It’s not like he was hiring Saban.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 2:52 pm to jlntiger
Which further explains the politics in Big time college athletics. Sometimes it’s best to let professional people do their jobs before overreacting; Especially publicly. Woodward’s job was to be caretaker of the athletic department and hire the best coaches and staffs possible. We saw a lot of success in that department. The football head coach may not have been the type of success desired but that doesn’t mean Scott didn’t know how to do his job.We can’t act like Big contracts weren’t a happening thing. Especially when it comes to coaches who have the type of resume’ Kelly has.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:30 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
Is this true? I thought Kelly's ouster on Sunday was driven by boosters and the governor, and not Woodward, who was just the messenger at most.
Prior to last weekend, Moscona, who is Woodward's public mouthpiece (fact; not a flame), was saying that Woodward was never going to fire Kelly because he was so married to such a big contract and hire.
It seems to me all the people who wanted LSU to keep Woodward would also have to be cool with Kelly staying on this year and into the future.
Prior to last weekend, Moscona, who is Woodward's public mouthpiece (fact; not a flame), was saying that Woodward was never going to fire Kelly because he was so married to such a big contract and hire.
It seems to me all the people who wanted LSU to keep Woodward would also have to be cool with Kelly staying on this year and into the future.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 4:43 pm to Tall Tiger
I just question whether a precedent is being set here. Every time you hire a Big name football coach to a long term contract, Are you going to fire the AD along with the coach if things don’t work out as planned. Easy to say “Well He brought Him here”. But really fan base and the school and the state, for that matter, wouldn’t any less. Saban wasn’t coming, who else was expected to come that had any amount of success that Saban had. I think the AD went after one of the more successful coaches in College Football and it didn’t work out at LSU. You can’t blame him for that. Now you can talk contracts in hindsight all you want to. But what is the alternative for that particular situation, stay with Orgeron? And watch things happen all around you? Then it would be said “ Where’s the AD? Why’d he not do His job?” IJS-
Posted on 11/1/25 at 4:44 pm to Balsamic_duck
quote:
in the real world when you perform poorly at work there are consequences
In the real world you don't get if you don't pay. Not talking about your job as a
"plug and play" plumber. There are fewer top notch football coaches in the country than there are competent people that could be President. And they call the shots on what they demand. Otherwise you end up with a plumber running a football program.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 4:47 pm to TwonTwon
quote:
I just question whether a precedent is being set here. Every time you hire a Big name football coach to a long term contract, Are you going to fire the AD along with the coach if things don’t work out as planned.
LSU is paying the number 2 and number 8 largest buyouts in history concurrently.
If you take away the jimbo extension his original contracts buyout would have been over $30 million and would be the number 3 largest buyout making Woodward responsible for the number 2 number 3 and number 8 largest buyouts.
It’s not just one contract.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 5:13 pm to Adam Banks
Wasn’t Jimbo’s contract extended after Scott came to LSU. So therefore the buyout happened after he was no longer employed at A&M. They didn’t have to extend that contract. And O’s contract extension was a reward for what happened in 2019. If you want to question that based on what transpired afterwards, We have a debate.. It was still his job to go out and get the best available coach if the decision was made to move on from Orgeron. In his shoes, who are you getting? And how much are you paying? … giving the landscape you’re competing in at that time.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 5:18 pm to TwonTwon
quote:
Wasn’t Jimbo’s contract extended after Scott came to LSU. So therefore the buyout happened after he was no longer employed at A&M. They didn’t have to extend that contract.
I’ll say it again slowly.
His buyout at the time he was fired…..without the extension.
Meaning if he had stayed on the original contract he signed.
Would have been over $30 million.
That would have been the largest buyout in history until this year.
That’s how absurd woodwards jimbo contract was.
ETA
quote:
In his shoes, who are you getting?
I’m interviewing Dan lanning lane kiffin and Lincoln Riley.
Riley still goes to USC and we end up with lanning or kiffin most likely kiffin at a very reasonable price
This post was edited on 11/1/25 at 5:22 pm
Popular
Back to top

0




