- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/21/18 at 5:45 pm to Lsuchampnj
Worst case it roughing the passer. To call THAT targeting is a fricking joke
Posted on 10/21/18 at 5:47 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
He went in high, he did not have to,
He went in to his chest.
quote:
he hit him after the ball left
His momentum brought the contact. These guys don’t have rail brakes you stupid fricking cünt.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 5:51 pm to tigerfoot
so by your definition if any contact with head or neck area occurs with head or neck area of defenseless player it's targeting:
targeting (left arm)
targeting
targeting
targeting
targeting (helmets touching, that's a defenseless reciever)
targeting (hey, their helmets are touching, your definition)
was was this not called
or this (kicking him in the helmet)
I'll tell you why none of these were called. All incidental contact.
targeting (left arm) targeting targeting targeting targeting (helmets touching, that's a defenseless reciever) targeting (hey, their helmets are touching, your definition) was was this not called or this (kicking him in the helmet) I'll tell you why none of these were called. All incidental contact.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 5:59 pm to Havoc
You sure are an angry little person
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:02 pm to I20goon
No, it’s because they are carrying the ball you dimwit.
You seriously linked all those pictures? Lol
Let’s do this again
Are those players defenseless....no. Disregard the rest. For it to be targeting it has to meet the definition of defenseless.
Now, carry on with your ignorance of the rules, your inability to critically think, and go march on those bastards in Birmingham
You seriously linked all those pictures? Lol
Let’s do this again
Are those players defenseless....no. Disregard the rest. For it to be targeting it has to meet the definition of defenseless.
Now, carry on with your ignorance of the rules, your inability to critically think, and go march on those bastards in Birmingham
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:03 pm to tenderfoot tigah
Yes. That’s what I’m saying. Incidental contact is NOT forcible contact. This, not targeting.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:04 pm to tigerfoot
quote:yes they are.
Are those players defenseless....no.
QBs or recievers (even if RB) in catch. Defenseless.
quote:that's the thing. It didn't take very long at all to find those. There's incidental contact with defenseless players helmets all the time. Incidental.
You seriously linked all those pictures? Lol
quote:mirror, you need one. And a couple kicks to your head too.
Now, carry on with your ignorance of the rules, your inability to critically think, and go march on those bastards in Birmingham
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:06 pm to I20goon
Your pictures don’t show that. They show ball carriers being tackled.
Lol. You are silly
Lol. You are silly
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:09 pm to Kimist
quote:I may be wrong, but I believe that Devin White can bend at his hips. Can’t believe that that possibility escaped you
You keep saying he went in high, and that is the problem. However, if he had lowered his head, that would have been targeting. You can't have it both ways.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:12 pm to tigerfoot
quote:he led with his hands you silly little frick. He shoved him.
I may be wrong, but I believe that Devin White can bend at his hips. Can’t believe that that possibility escaped you
The forceable contact was between his hands and chest. You silly little frick.
Hence any other contact with the head or neck area was incidental, not forceable... you. silly. little. frick.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:32 pm to Lsuchampnj
If lsu is down 4+ scores when White gets in the game maybe he should show the sec and everyone else what targeting really looks like and on the way out throw a couple of punches.
He can sit out Arkansas
He can sit out Arkansas
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:33 pm to I20goon
When you don’t understand things I suppose life gets hard. If you are describing the rule as you think it should be, versus what it is, then you are right. We may as well make field goals 4pts in our make believe world
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:36 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
Defenseless player...check.
Contact to the head or neck area.....check.
Yes, targeting.
Tigerfoot is a dumbass alter ...check
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:42 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
tigerfoot
Every poster here is saying White hit the QB in the chest. Not the head/neck.
Your answer is to call them retarded.
You can't have targeting, even if all other criteria are met, if the player is hit in the chest. White hit him in the chest.
STFU, dude.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:44 pm to CalTiger53
quote:
So if a Bama player pushes Joe B anywhere on the chest or higher it is targeting right?
Well that's different!
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:48 pm to tigerfoot
Then clearly you are blind if you saw otherwise
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:51 pm to tigerfoot
quote:
And White clearly broke it.
IF (as in for the sake of argument) this were true then there would be a ton of these calls made in every game...
same if the holding rule was upheld with offensive lines...
Technically every lineman is "leading" with his helmet when he comes off the line... but this is not called either..
So clearly, the "Letter" of the ruling is not followed in each and every game with regard to "rules" in much of the game. Clearly common sense discretion is part of interpreting how the rules apply.
there is no justification for the call in light of the discretion that is exercised with many other rules of the game... In this case its inconsistent, inappropriate and bad for the game.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:57 pm to Pauldean
As long as the chest is connected to the neck I will stand by my statement.
White went in too high.
If not there would be no question. This is a White issue.
I think the ruling ducks, I think that White was much more benign than Wilson, I think the helmet contact was incidental. I also think none of that matters. The rule, as written, makes White guilty.
White went in too high.
If not there would be no question. This is a White issue.
I think the ruling ducks, I think that White was much more benign than Wilson, I think the helmet contact was incidental. I also think none of that matters. The rule, as written, makes White guilty.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:02 pm to tigerfoot
Tigerfoot, I swear you are either auditioning to be an SEC referee or you might already be one.
Those are NOT compliments.
Those are NOT compliments.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News