Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

NEW: NCAA Baseball postseason change

Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:17 pm
Posted by GEAUX5
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
5145 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:17 pm
Per Kendall Rogers; Teams are going to be seeded 1-16
quote:

Stories Summer Login Top Seeding Changes Coming To Tourney NEWS Kendall Rogers - October 6, 2017 mouths

For years, college baseball coaches and fans alike have asked the same question about how the NCAA tournament field is assembled. “If softball can seed the top teams in the tournament 1-16, why can’t baseball?”. That’s the question that has been on everyone’s mind for at least the past decade. It was guaranteed to come up at every State of Baseball press conference in Omaha, and it has always been a topic of discussion at the American Baseball Coaches Association Convention as well. That question no longer needs to be asked, as the NCAA baseball postseason format will include seeding the Top 16 teams and regional hosts in the field of 64 as opposed to just the Top 8 teams that we’re accustomed to, a measure that was approved this past week by the Division I Baseball Committee and subsequently by the NCAA Championship Oversight Committee. “This is a big deal for our sport. We have to continue making the tournament better and by going 1-16 with the top seeds, it makes our tournament more equal to all areas,” Sidwell said. “The committee felt strongly that this was something we should do. There were times when there were particular restrictions on travel, mileage and things like that, but we wanted to grow the game and make the tourney better. “So, now we’re at 1-16, and I think we get more of a true field,” he continued. “We will have true matchups in super regionals for the teams in the Top 16. My biggest thing is looking at our great sport and find ways that we can grow the game and make everything better, whether it’s pace of play or simply tweaking some things in regards to the postseason.” The best news? It’ll start in 2018 and the format will call for 1 vs. 16, 2 vs. 15, and so on in the super regional round. Should one of those seeds get upset in the regional round, the winner of the regional would replace them as that seed and there would not be a reseeding process, a potential future change that many coaches are still in favor of. “This is a great step forward for our sport and long overdue,” TCU coach Jim Schlossnagle said. “College baseball has grown to the point that regionalization of the NCAA tournament should be an afterthought to putting the best possible tournament structure together.”


I think this is huge news due to the fact that it'll create a better matchup and not a "regional" matchup for the Supers.

This post was edited on 10/6/17 at 12:39 pm
Posted by sheek
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Sep 2007
43894 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:33 pm to
So no more sending Southeastern or insert the nearest team to a regional site instead it will be a true national field of sixteen? am I reading that right?
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136811 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

So no more sending Southeastern or insert the nearest team to a regional site instead it will be a true national field of sixteen? am I reading that right?

southeastern will still go to local rgionals

they just wont put houston regional with college station regional just because they are geographically close
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14731 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:38 pm to
This means you wont have TCU v. A&M or Texas every year because they are close and there would likely not be a repeat of LSU v. Tulane.
Posted by sheek
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Sep 2007
43894 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

they just wont put houston regional with college station regional just because they are geographically close


Oh Ok. thanks for clarifying Rouge.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68316 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:47 pm to
Curious the way they put about 2,3 and 4 seeds "Replacing" the national host seed for super regional purposes.

So a 4 seed that wins the 8 seeded regional would host a super over a 2 seed who wins the 9 seeded regional?
Posted by GEAUX5
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
5145 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:53 pm to
To which they stated it, that sounds to be correct but quite questioning on why they would do it like that.
Posted by jbro12
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2015
563 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:14 pm to
Doesn’t sound right. I’d be shocked if that’s what they came up with. Letting a regional 4 seed host over a top 16 seed b/c they beat a top 8 seed doesn’t sound right. That would also hurt the revenue from a super regional. Why would you let a team like Nichols if it came out of a regional instead of a team like LSU.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14514 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:00 pm to
I just wish they would expand replay.
Posted by Hold That Tiger 10
Member since Oct 2013
21061 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Letting a regional 4 seed host over a top 16 seed b/c they beat a top 8 seed doesn’t sound right


In the full article did it say that this is what they would do? BC in the quoted area that's not what it says.

If the #5 overall seed loses, then the winner of that regional would assume that #5 seed position. To me, that means there is no reseeding...it doesn't mean that the new "#5 seed" would host the super regional.
This post was edited on 10/6/17 at 2:07 pm
Posted by bigjuice56
Ponchatoula, LA
Member since Mar 2009
1131 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:06 pm to
I could be reading into this wrong, but I think this was more in regards to them not re-seeding after the regional round. So the team that beat the #8 seed and the team that beat the #9 seed would still be matched up in the super, but the process for determining who hosted wouldn't be changed.

I wouldn't mind seeing a re-seed going into the Supers - don't seed 1-16 until after the regionals are completed.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79677 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:07 pm to
This is great.

Now for once, maybe we'll play somebody other than Rice in the Regionals/SRs.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79677 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't mind seeing a re-seed going into the Supers - don't seed 1-16 until after the regionals are completed.


Reseeding after regionals, then again after SRs is what I would advocate.
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
18960 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

So a 4 seed that wins the 8 seeded regional would host a super over a 2 seed who wins the 9 seeded regional?


No, unless I'm reading it wrong the higher seed would always host the super regional. So a 2 seed from a lower "regional" would host the 4 seed from a higher "regional".

The change is more about seeding for the start of the tournament.
Posted by thunderbird1100
GSU Eagles fan
Member since Oct 2007
68316 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

No, unless I'm reading it wrong the higher seed would always host the super regional. So a 2 seed from a lower "regional" would host the 4 seed from a higher "regional".



That's naturally what I would think, but they just worded it really porrly
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
18960 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 2:55 pm to
They did. Glad to see it finally happen.
Posted by CheerWhine
A little bit of Mardi Gras
Member since Apr 2014
73160 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 6:08 pm to
Great to see this happen. This format makes a lot more sense than arbitrarily assigning 9-16 "seeds" based on geography.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram