Started By
Message

re: New Baseball America Rankings- Tigers up to No. 3...

Posted on 4/7/25 at 11:41 am to
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 11:41 am to
quote:

I'm not using hindsight, I've just never even thrown out the possibility of him being benched because I never thought it was a possibility. For someone who is claiming that I melt every time LSU loses, using 23 at bats as a sample size for saying that the starting center fielder might be benched seems kind of reactionary..


It’s less about Stanfield and more about Larson not getting ABs and Frey having to platoon even though he’s been outstanding.

It’s not surprising that went over your head though.

quote:

ETA: I like Stanfield, just for the record. There are just some really good hitters platooning, or not seeing ABs at all, that play in the OF. He needs to pick it up just a bit in conference play IMO. Same goes for Pearson.


You also left out that part of the post. Weird.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 11:42 am
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
19037 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 11:49 am to
quote:

It’s less about Stanfield and more about Larson not getting ABs and Frey having to platoon even though he’s been outstanding.


Yeah Larson, who isn't great defensively and is batting .231 in SEC play? Stanfield, Larson, and Frey are all extremely different players and not super comparable. Stanfield was never in jeopardy of getting benched.
quote:

You also left out that part of the post. Weird.

Nah I saw it. I was really just addressing the fact that you thought Stanfield was possibly going to get benched was dumb imo. I don't feel the same about your Pearson take.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 11:58 am
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Yeah Larson, who isn't great defensively and is batting .231 in SEC play?


Yea, Larson. The guy who hit .337 in SEC play as a freshman.

quote:

Stanfield, Larson, and Frey are all extremely different players and not super comparable. Stanfield was never in jeopardy of getting benched.


And? Acting like Curiel, Larson, Brown and Frey couldn’t man the outfield is dumb. Throw in Pearson who always seems to heat up at the right time.

Stanfield was outstanding against Oklahoma. He’s the starting CF, but to act like there aren’t 5 other guys who can play OF for this team is disingenuous.

Stanfield is good, but he’s far from irreplaceable.

quote:

Nah I saw it. I was really just addressing the you though Stanfield was possibly going to get benched was dumb imo.


Ironic.

Posted by FredbullTN
Houston
Member since Sep 2023
5600 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 12:17 pm to
Wait…how is Larson batting .231 in SEC play this year?
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
19037 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Yea, Larson. The guy who hit .337 in SEC play as a freshman.

I’m not saying Larson is bad. You were judging Stanfield off a small sample size of SEC at bats so I did the same with Larson.
quote:

Acting like Curiel, Larson, Brown and Frey couldn’t man the outfield is dumb. Throw in Pearson who always seems to heat up at the right time.

I never said they can’t man the outfield. But there wouldn’t be a significant drop off defensively and I think that plays a role.
quote:

but to act like there aren’t 5 other guys who can play OF for this team is disingenuous.

It seems like you think that I said this… am I missing something?

The only reason I brought up that post was because you are saying that I overreact every time LSU loses. I was just pointing out the fact that you once threw out the possibility that our starting center fielder, who has played in every single game this season could possibly get benched based on 23 at bats. But you’re right, that does seem ironic. Do you think maybe you overreacted?
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 12:23 pm
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

I’m not saying Larson is bad. You were judging Stanfield off a small sample size of SEC at bats so I did the same with Larson.




I didn’t arbitrarily pick a number. I used SEC stats, which is common.

quote:

I never said they can’t man the outfield. But there wouldn’t be a significant drop off defensively and I think that plays a role.


Acting like Stanfield is irreplaceable implies it, does it not?

Also, Johnson has proven that he will field the best lineup and sacrifice some defense to do it if necessary.

quote:

The only reason I brought up that post was because you are saying that I overreact every time LSU loses. I was just pointing out the fact that you once threw out the possibility that our starting center fielder, who has played in every single game this season could possibly get benched based on 23 at bats. But you’re right, that does seem ironic.


Whataboutism. You’ve mastered it.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
19037 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

I didn’t arbitrarily pick a number. I used SEC stats, which is common.

That's exactly what I did with Larson.
quote:

Acting like Stanfield is irreplaceable implies it, does it not?

Did I do that?
quote:

Whataboutism. You’ve mastered it.

So you agree that you overreacted?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

That's exactly what I did with Larson.




No you didn’t.

quote:

Did I do that?


Yes, you did. I know you’re slow, but come on man.

quote:

So you agree that you overreacted?


Saying LSU has other talented guys and Stanfield needed to pick it up a bit isn’t overreacting to anything.

Had I said he was garbage and needed to be benched would be overreacting.

Quite a bit of difference between those two sentiments.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
19037 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

No you didn’t.

I used Larson's batting average from the season. I didn't arbitrarily pick a random number.
quote:

Yes, you did. I know you’re slow, but come on man.

Show me where I acted like he was irreplaceable. You can't because I didn't. I said I don't think he was ever in danger of being benched. Which he wasn't.
quote:

Saying LSU has other talented guys and Stanfield needed to pick it up a bit isn’t overreacting to anything.

Had I said he was garbage and needed to be benched would be overreacting.


If I said that Milam needs to pick it up because we have talented guys on the bench and he might lose playing time, do you think that would be an overreaction? After all, he is 10-42 in SEC play and both Braswell and Reaves are both hitting over .300. You think Milam might get benched down the stretch?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

used Larson's batting average from the season. I didn't arbitrarily pick a random number.


You said you used his SEC stats but I’m not arguing semantics with you. I know you used his overall average.

quote:

If I said that Milam needs to pick it up because we have talented guys on the bench and he might lose playing time, do you think that would be an overreaction? After all, he is 10-42 in SEC play and both Braswell and Reaves are both hitting over .300. You think Milam might get benched down the stretch?


I don’t think it’s an overreaction to believe anyone can find the bench if they aren’t producing, including Milam (and I think Milam is an excellent player).

This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 1:03 pm
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
19037 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:02 pm to
So are you right now saying that Milam "better heat up with the bat or he won’t see much action in the back half"?
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 1:03 pm
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
9659 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

I don’t think it’s an overreaction to believe anyone can find the bench if they aren’t producing, including Milam (and I think Milam is an excellent player).

Milam’s defense is irreplaceable. Zero chance he would find the bench. Besides I don’t believe it’d be a worry since he’ll heat up at some point.
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
9659 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

I don’t think it’s an overreaction to believe anyone can find the bench if they aren’t producing, including Milam (and I think Milam is an excellent player).

Milam’s defense is irreplaceable. Zero chance he would find the bench. Besides I don’t believe it’d be a worry since he’ll heat up at some point.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

So are you right now saying that Milam "better heat up with the bat or he won’t see much action in the back half"?


I don’t think there as nearly as many good options at SS as there are for the outfield, so it’s less likely.

I don’t think anyone in the lineup is irreplaceable like you seem to. (Yes I know you didn’t “say” it but your obtuse questioning of me saying someone could be replaced shows what you think. Time to move on from that)

I think the depth on this roster is one of its major strengths.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Milam’s defense is irreplaceable. Zero chance he would find the bench. Besides I don’t believe it’d be a worry since he’ll heat up at some point.


I don’t think he’s irreplaceable, but I agree he’s highly unlikely to lose ABs. Same for Jones, Curiel and Dickinson.

ETA: The LSU players I’d consider irreplaceable is pretty short. It’s just a difference of opinion on what that word means.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 1:10 pm
Posted by Circumlocution
two doors down
Member since Sep 2024
167 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:08 pm to
All of you who are making reservations to Omaha need to think about behind home plate tickets to Hoover first. If everbody keeps improving that's gonna be the showcase of the college baseball best of the best. Can't wait to see that show!
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
40491 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:08 pm to
RynoTroll activated.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
19037 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

I don’t think there as nearly as many good options at SS as there are for the outfield, so it’s less likely.

You are comparing one position to three positions.
quote:

I don’t think anyone in the lineup is irreplaceable like you seem to.

You are the only one that is saying irreplaceable. I have never said that. But I think there are 5 players that will play almost every game barring injury.
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
6932 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:15 pm to
You’re such a fricking idiot man I don’t know a lot about every sport, but I do know more about baseball than 99% of people out there and that includes you. You don’t sound knowledgeable or smart. Gfy
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52225 posts
Posted on 4/7/25 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

You are comparing one position to three positions.


Sort of. Curiel sliding to CF wouldn’t be nearly the downgrade as whoever replaces Milam. Defense at the corner OF spots is much less important.

quote:

You are the only one that is saying irreplaceable.


You implied it, even though you clearly didn’t realize it.

quote:

But I think there are 5 players that will play almost every game barring injury.


Sure, with Stanfield being the one who would lose ABs first if he struggles, which was my entire point in that old post you tried to gotcha me with.

Glad you’re finally coming around.
This post was edited on 4/7/25 at 1:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram