- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Miles DOES NOT Win Games He's Not Suppose to
Posted on 11/12/09 at 1:19 pm to I-59 Tiger
Posted on 11/12/09 at 1:19 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
Miles DOES NOT Win Games He's Not Suppose to
Double negative, semantics
Posted on 11/12/09 at 1:30 pm to peopleschamp
Holy shite this thread is still going?
I feel bad for the OP, some dumb statements can be swept under the rug and forgotten, but it seems like everyone on TD.com has now seen this thread.
I feel bad for the OP, some dumb statements can be swept under the rug and forgotten, but it seems like everyone on TD.com has now seen this thread.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 1:51 pm to Choctaw
quote:
My point was that even without those problems we lose 2 or 3 games to the powerhouse teams in the SEC
quote:I never said it was, it was my opinion.
However...this is not.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 1:51 pm to lsumatt
Some of people like piling on to pump your own chest.
But you dinks need to read a little slower...
What the hell has the posigaytiger's panties in a wad?
Bringing up bowl games is just stupid given the context of the OP.
I'd like to know what "big time" conference game LSU won under Miles that we were not supposed to. I have one in mind, but I'll let some of you dinks ponder it for a while. (It ain't Auby last year either....don't bring that weak-arse team up)
But you dinks need to read a little slower...
quote:
...Miles has yet to win a "Big Time" game in conference that he was suppose to lose
quote:
My topic of discussion is games we were not suppose to win, that we acutally won, which is not many with Miles.
What the hell has the posigaytiger's panties in a wad?
Bringing up bowl games is just stupid given the context of the OP.
I'd like to know what "big time" conference game LSU won under Miles that we were not supposed to. I have one in mind, but I'll let some of you dinks ponder it for a while. (It ain't Auby last year either....don't bring that weak-arse team up)
Posted on 11/12/09 at 2:01 pm to SaintLSUnAtl
quote:
We were favored that game....after 2 hurricanes and playing 12 weeks in a row.
LSU weren't a fav by gametime, it opened like LSU -2, but by kickoff, UGA was -1 and -1.5. Look back at my Goldsheet logs on page 4.
I remember it well, I called in a play from a mobile home before walking to the Dome. I lost a dime +1, bet with my heart not my head. All the late sharp money was on UGA. The game was officially lost a mere eight minutes into regulation..manhandled..buried..dead legs..fini.
This post was edited on 11/12/09 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 11/12/09 at 2:19 pm to Bert Lyons 716
quote:
Short memoryLSU was 7pt dog to Ga Tech and a dog to Miami in'05
Posted on 11/12/09 at 2:31 pm to biglego
Not conference games, not home or away games, and he acknowledged those already.
Try again.
Read the OP a little slower for comprehension, then come back.
You dinks are unreal.
Try again.
Read the OP a little slower for comprehension, then come back.
You dinks are unreal.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 2:32 pm to caljammer82
Ok...you can't say Les loses the games. HE DOESN'T PLAY! The only thing he can do is light a fire under the players butts! We still get to BCS Bowl games. Until then, I am not gonna sweat it. Criticize the way the guys are playing, not the Coach. Yeah he coaches, but he doesn't play.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 2:55 pm to caljammer82
We're the only top team that has to play Alabama and Florida every year. There's no way to avoid it. Alabama does not have to play Florida every year. Alabama would be favored in every game they play except for when they play Florida. We played both teams tough while they BOTH has 2 weeks to prepare for us. They should have won with that kind of time. I like our chances even more if we catch either of those teams without having the benefit of a bye week.
Also, we were not favored to win in Georgia and we did. Georgia was -3. Here's a quote:
... and that was the day of the game.
Also, we were not favored to win in Georgia and we did. Georgia was -3. Here's a quote:
quote:
LSU vs Georgia College Football Predictions & Betting Odds - College game day did not even come to this game. The biggest game of the week. The College Football Betting Odds list Georgia -3.5 favorites at bodog.com. So the loser of this game was overated and the winner was lucky to get by.
... and that was the day of the game.
This post was edited on 11/12/09 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:09 pm to DP40
quote:
Not conference games, not home or away games, and he acknowledged those already.
Try again.
Read the OP a little slower for comprehension, then come back.
You dinks are unreal.
Dont get so pissy. I didnt read the OP so I didnt know you confined your post to conference games.
But I get your point. Miles doesnt win many SEC games that his team was not favored to win. Although I doubt he is alone in this. And LSU is probably favored in every conference game except Florida, Bama, and UGA on the road. Not many teams do well against them.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:18 pm to biglego
Okay people Im back to finalize my thread, which some of you obviously aren't getting. So here is the deal....
For purposes of THIS discussion, I thought it worthwile to bring a few other facts to light. In addition to NEVER winning a game as a real underdog (except the 2 Chick'nSh't Peach Bowls), the following should be considered:
(1) He has lost SEVERAL games where he was favored.
UT 05, UGA 05, UK 07, Ark 07, Ole Miss 08, Ark 08
(2) His wins include a lot of close games which should not have been (LSU was heavy favorite but game was close). Every coach has these games; however, for Les they happen with a rare high frequency.
Ark 05, Ole Miss 06, Bama 07, Tulane 07 , Troy 08, UW 09, Vandy 09, Ms St 09
(3) He only has two STATEMENT wins where he has blown out an above average opponent.
Ms St 07 and Va Tech 07
As I already pointed out, if you lose 6 games where you were the favorite (games you were "supposed" to win) and win 0 games in which you were the underdog (games you were "supposed " to lose), then there is an inequity on the side of LOSING. For all you non-math majors out there, that averages out to 2 losses per season. And anyone worth a hill of beans knows that he was the only coach in the history of the sport who was lucky enough to win a championship with 2 marks in the L column. It doen't take a genious to realize that this is not the mark of a GREAT coach nor the mark of a team that wins championhips.
I could counter with several pages of the good stuff Les has done to show that he's not a BAD coach. That's not what this thread was about. Bottom line…Les Miles is a DECENT coach but not anywhere close to a GREAT coach. His pay puts him in the elite class where things like this will separate him from his far superior peers.
For purposes of THIS discussion, I thought it worthwile to bring a few other facts to light. In addition to NEVER winning a game as a real underdog (except the 2 Chick'nSh't Peach Bowls), the following should be considered:
(1) He has lost SEVERAL games where he was favored.
UT 05, UGA 05, UK 07, Ark 07, Ole Miss 08, Ark 08
(2) His wins include a lot of close games which should not have been (LSU was heavy favorite but game was close). Every coach has these games; however, for Les they happen with a rare high frequency.
Ark 05, Ole Miss 06, Bama 07, Tulane 07 , Troy 08, UW 09, Vandy 09, Ms St 09
(3) He only has two STATEMENT wins where he has blown out an above average opponent.
Ms St 07 and Va Tech 07
As I already pointed out, if you lose 6 games where you were the favorite (games you were "supposed" to win) and win 0 games in which you were the underdog (games you were "supposed " to lose), then there is an inequity on the side of LOSING. For all you non-math majors out there, that averages out to 2 losses per season. And anyone worth a hill of beans knows that he was the only coach in the history of the sport who was lucky enough to win a championship with 2 marks in the L column. It doen't take a genious to realize that this is not the mark of a GREAT coach nor the mark of a team that wins championhips.
I could counter with several pages of the good stuff Les has done to show that he's not a BAD coach. That's not what this thread was about. Bottom line…Les Miles is a DECENT coach but not anywhere close to a GREAT coach. His pay puts him in the elite class where things like this will separate him from his far superior peers.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:20 pm to caljammer82
quote:
Bottom line…Les Miles is a DECENT coach but not anywhere close to a GREAT coach
Well shite, I dont think many people will argue with that. Why didnt you just say that in the first place? You know we arent that clever around here.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:25 pm to caljammer82
Can someone please tell me why in the frick we're using vegas lines to determine if Les Miles is the right coach?
For chrissakes, this has to be the dumbest post ever launched on this board (and that's saying a lot).
For chrissakes, this has to be the dumbest post ever launched on this board (and that's saying a lot).
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:32 pm to denvertiger
It's not a dumb post, basically the odds tell us (the general watching public) who is "suppose" to win the game based on odds. Like if we are a road team, or home team, etc...
I'm not sure what everyone else uses to determine if we are suppose to win, but I'm not a dilusional fan and believe we should win every game.
So unless you can tell me a better way to see what games we are likely to win vs likely to lose, I am all ears.
I'm not sure what everyone else uses to determine if we are suppose to win, but I'm not a dilusional fan and believe we should win every game.
So unless you can tell me a better way to see what games we are likely to win vs likely to lose, I am all ears.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:36 pm to caljammer82
You are an idiot!
Your statement only shows how well Miles has done here and how outstanding of a coach he has been for LSU.

Your statement only shows how well Miles has done here and how outstanding of a coach he has been for LSU.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:48 pm to caljammer82
quote:
It's not a dumb post, basically the odds tell us (the general watching public) who is "suppose" to win the game based on odds. Like if we are a road team, or home team, etc...
With the exception of being a double-digit favorite/underdog, the odds tell you more about where the money is then whether or not you're "suppose" to win.
quote:
So unless you can tell me a better way to see what games we are likely to win vs likely to lose, I am all ears.
And here's what most find so fricked up about your logic. If LSU is supposed to lose to UF or Bama, and they do, that somehow means Miles is a bad coach? You're using a screwy metric to determine a coach's worth. I think may here agree with your assessment that Miles is decent not great, but the methods you use to come to that conclusion are a bit screwy.
And frankly, if Miles can win 9-10 games/year with a winning bowl record and manage to recruit kids who don't hold up other students in front of a convenience store, then he's a bit better then 'decent'. JMO.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:52 pm to denvertiger
quote:
Can someone please tell me why in the frick we're using vegas lines
Because, Oddsmakers and BMs are a helluva lot smarter than are the general fan, when it comes to gauging and calibrating team vs team, and how they match-up. Otherwise, LSU vs Aub, LSU vs UGA, etc..would be very vague from year-to-year given the game site.
I posted the Goldsheet Spread Logs for the Miles tenure on page 4, since the the thread's title and initial argument by jammer may confuse some fans, and leave for widespread debate over whom was supposed to win which games. Without LVSC, CRIS, Greek, Sagarin, Goldsheet, or simple points for and against averages, etc..most folks haven't a clue where and how teams really match-up with any concision.
Posted on 11/12/09 at 3:57 pm to caljammer82
quote:
win 0 games in which you were the underdog (games you were "supposed " to lose)
How can you even consider this a discussion if you fail to acknowledge anyone's points? Your 0 number is frankly inaccurate. People have already provided you with multiple examples beyond the bowl victories and you fail to recognize anything anyone else is saying. It's like you're boy from Big Daddy and we're playing the "I win" game with you.
This post was edited on 11/12/09 at 3:58 pm
Popular
Back to top


1


