- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Miles comes in at #2 on list of current SEC head coaches...
Posted on 4/7/10 at 1:09 pm to TheBaker
Posted on 4/7/10 at 1:09 pm to TheBaker
quote:
why was he fired?!
He was 0-4 at the CWS, he loss a regional in BR, and he failed to make post season play would be my guess.
Miles is 2-0 in BCS play, won a NC, 4-1 in bowls, and has never failed to reach the postseason.
Seems to be a tad of difference to me, but we all see what we see.
Coker had team problems that lead to his fall from grace at Miami highlighted by on the field fights, mass players suspensions, shootings, the Governor calling his program out, and more which to his firing as much if not more than his record. Plus, Cokers team was not nationally ranked in his final year.
People tell you "...no comparison!" cause there isn't any reasonable comparison, but knock yourself out.

Posted on 4/7/10 at 1:13 pm to Lonnie4LSU
quote:I love that Coker excuse.
Coker had team problems that lead to his fall from grace at Miami highlighted by on the field fights, mass players suspensions, shootings, the Governor calling his program out, and more which to his firing as much if not more than his record. Plus, Cokers team was not nationally ranked in his final year.
People tell you "...no comparison!" cause there isn't any reasonable comparison, but knock yourself out
I'll stay with Miles is 1-8 against teams that have won 9 or more games the last 2 years

Posted on 4/7/10 at 1:51 pm to Dennis4LSU
quote:
I love that Coker excuse.
I don't have any reason to make excuses for Coker. He loss control of his program from everything I hear/read and the school reacted.
quote:
I'll stay with Miles is 1-8 against teams that have won 9 or more games the last 2 years
I'm not clear as what you are saying, but I think I can assume you are knocking Miles in some way. Yes, 1-8 or whatever it might be is a red flag for me. I'll wait to see what happens this year before I jump from any cliffs.
BTW, are you TheBaker as well as Dennis? You kinda post like him and you responded to the post I made to him. Just wondering........

Posted on 4/7/10 at 2:04 pm to Lonnie4LSU
what i meant is Miles has only beaten 1 team the last two years that ended the season with 9 wins or more.
Not The baker
Not The baker
Posted on 4/7/10 at 3:47 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
LSU is not 1-8 the last two seasons against ranked opponents. The Tigers are 3-6 against ranked opponents the last two seasons,
Using rankings at the end of the season (since 5-7 Auburn was in no way a top 25 team in 2008 despite the fact that they were overrated early like we were, and ditto for Georgia in 2009 except to a lesser extent), we are indeed 1-8. Georgia Tech in 2008 was probably overrated, too, but the ACC was just too weak to expose them.
quote:
You may very well end up being right (that Miles is a mediocre coach at best), but up to this point in Miles' career at LSU, you are, however, wrong.
Not necessarily. Just going by won/lost record without any consideration of the context or sample size is not a valid analysis of his coaching ability. Or is Hal Hunter the greatest coach in LSU history? Miles has demonstrated mediocre coaching ability for at least the last two years, and that's even if you ignore the things he did in the first three years that raised more than a few eyebrows. He has also overseen the undeniable and significant decline in the overall quality of the team from his early years to the present. This year's LSU team will enter the season with the lowest ranking of any LSU team in 10 years.
quote:
I'll wait and see what actually happens rather than base my opinions on what I predict will happen.
Fine, wait until the sun actually does come up in the morning before basing any opinions on your prediction that it will.
quote:
2008 and 2009 were arguably the worst LSU teams this decade
And was that just an irresistible act of nature, or was it the result of mediocre coaching (which includes recruiting, developing players, using them effectively, avoiding excessive attrition, etc.)?
quote:
four of those losses came against the last two national champions, it's not as "doom and gloom" as you make it out to be.
That still leaves five other losses. Five losses in two years is more than in any two-year span since 2002-03. That's really sad. Throw out nearly half his losses, and he's STILL performing worse in the last two years than we have in the last seven.
Posted on 4/7/10 at 3:48 pm to Lonnie4LSU
quote:
1-8 or whatever it might be is a red flag for me. I'll wait to see what happens this year before I jump from any cliffs.
This is a curious position I've seen a lot of his defenders take. If two shitty years isn't enough to convince you, what's so magical about three? Why not four, or seven, or thirty?
Posted on 4/7/10 at 4:54 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
If two shitty years isn't enough
Sorry, but 3rd in the SEC, nationally ranked, and playing in a major bowl does not equate to " shitty" year for me.
It's the Top 20 my Tigers finished in and not the "shitty" 20 or the "mediocre" 20, but each to our own.


Posted on 4/7/10 at 5:20 pm to BearTiger
amen, dude. in the same season, he wet the bed in the music city bowl by punting to bc with about a minute left and i believe they had no t.o.'s. anyway, they thought they would get the ball back and bc ran the clock out. unfortunately for the hatter, his was on the cbs game of the week.
Posted on 4/7/10 at 5:22 pm to thebert4130
quote:
i seem to remember people saying this about florida last year. anything can happen.
Dude, they went 13-1. They went to the SEC Title Game. They won a BCS game. Seriously.
This post was edited on 4/7/10 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 4/7/10 at 5:36 pm to Lonnie4LSU
quote:
3rd in the SEC, nationally ranked, and playing in a major bowl does not equate to " shitty" year for me.
If the 2009 season was acceptable performance for LSU on a consistent basis, then you are laboring under the mentality of mediocrity that plagued LSU for decades, which explains your consistent defense of a mediocre coach. If it wasn't, then it was a shitty year.
Losing four games, beating no one of note, throwing two games away on stupid coaching blunders, having the 112th best offense (or defense) in the country and finishing outside the top 15 is unacceptable performance for a school with top 10 facilities, top 10 budget expenditures, top 10 fan support, a top 10 recruiting base, top 10 national visibility, top 10 historical status and a top 5 coach's salary. It is especially unacceptable as the supposed big bounce back from an even shittier season.
Posted on 4/7/10 at 5:39 pm to Tigerdandy
quote:
I want him gone because I'm a idiot and a mediocre LSU fan.
It's amazing how Miles' defenders can be so completely wrong, a full 180 degrees from reality. If you support Miles and want to keep him here, you are a shitty LSU fan, or no fan of LSU at all.
See my sig quote. You are the shitty father who wants your daughter to stay with the a-hole she's married to.
Posted on 4/7/10 at 5:44 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:Before you look down your nose at anyone for being completely wrong and a full 180 degrees from reality you should......
It's amazing how Miles' defenders can be so completely wrong, a full 180 degrees from reality.
quote:
See my sig quote.
This post was edited on 4/7/10 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 4/7/10 at 5:47 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
If the 2009 season was acceptable performance for LSU on a consistent basis,
it's not acceptable on a consistent basis, but there was improvement over '08 so it isn't time to make a move yet. I think Miles made a mistake by not making a move on Crowton at the end of last year, especially if Steve Logan was available, and that might cost him if things don't turn around in a big way this year.
Nuts, are you interested at all in LSU football, or just Miles-bashing...I never see you in any other threads??
Posted on 4/7/10 at 5:53 pm to Nuts4LSU
So, correct me if I'm wrong, your basic assertion is that Miles is not an elite coach, Miles has LSU in the worst position we've been relative to program status in 10 years, and that the LSU football program is in the midst of a downward spiral under Miles.
I respect your opinion, and genuinely understand why those type of opinions have manifested themselves over the course of the last two seasons given LSU's struggles and Bama's resurgence under Saban (I've been just as frustrated as any LSU fan the last two years).
All that said, I personally think your opinion is irrational given current data and I respectfully disagree. I believe Miles (and the program in general) have all the tools in place and the ability to position LSU back into SEC and national title contention in 2010 and 2011 after a very brief absence from "title" contention in 2008-2009.
I may be wrong. We may very well go 7-5 in 2010, and I may re-evaluate things and form the opinion that it's time for a change. I'm certainly not to that point yet, and I think it's silly if anyone has already reached that point, although everyone is entitled to their opinions. 2010 is a big year for Miles. 2009 was big in terms of recovering from a disasterous 2008, and in many ways, LSU was successful in doing that last season. Now it's time to get back to the top, and it will be interesting to see if Miles and this team can do that. I believe they can. Again, we shall see.
I respect your opinion, and genuinely understand why those type of opinions have manifested themselves over the course of the last two seasons given LSU's struggles and Bama's resurgence under Saban (I've been just as frustrated as any LSU fan the last two years).
All that said, I personally think your opinion is irrational given current data and I respectfully disagree. I believe Miles (and the program in general) have all the tools in place and the ability to position LSU back into SEC and national title contention in 2010 and 2011 after a very brief absence from "title" contention in 2008-2009.
I may be wrong. We may very well go 7-5 in 2010, and I may re-evaluate things and form the opinion that it's time for a change. I'm certainly not to that point yet, and I think it's silly if anyone has already reached that point, although everyone is entitled to their opinions. 2010 is a big year for Miles. 2009 was big in terms of recovering from a disasterous 2008, and in many ways, LSU was successful in doing that last season. Now it's time to get back to the top, and it will be interesting to see if Miles and this team can do that. I believe they can. Again, we shall see.
This post was edited on 4/7/10 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 4/7/10 at 6:26 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
are you interested at all in LSU football, or just Miles-bashing.
It's just my opinion, but I think the subject of Les Miles is relevant to LSU football. If I weren't interested in LSU football, why would I give a shite about Miles?
quote:
I never see you in any other threads??
Then you aren't reading very many of them. Granted, I don't even open the idiotic big cat drill threads or whatever the hell it is, and if it's another thread with someone going off about the spring game, I usually skip it, but I do post a lot in threads about the QB situation, Crowton, the prospects for next year, etc.
Posted on 4/7/10 at 6:32 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
So, correct me if I'm wrong, your basic assertion is that Miles is not an elite coach, Miles has LSU in the worst position we've been relative to program status in 10 years, and that the LSU football program is in the midst of a downward spiral under Miles.
Yes. Exactly.
quote:
I personally think your opinion is irrational given current data and I respectfully disagree. I believe Miles (and the program in general) have all the tools in place and the ability to position LSU back into SEC and national title contention in 2010 and 2011 after a very brief absence from "title" contention in 2008-2009.
I don't think it's irrational. The last two years are more than ample evidence to make the opinion completely rational, even if it happens to be wrong in the end (which I sincerely hope it is).
As for having the tools in place, I don't know what you're seeing that makes you think this. The QB situation is still a complete disaster. The OL may be even worse this year than it was last year, if that's possible. The DL is small and and the LBs are nothing special. The receivers have speed and apparent talent, but still can't even seem to catch the relatively few passes our QBs manage to put in their hands. And, frankly, a head coach who can't even call a timeout when the clock is running out and we're behind, but rushes onto the field to call one when the clock is stopped for a possession change, does not bode well for any team. Not firing an OC that finished 112th in the country with top 10 talent is another really bad sign.
Of course anyone is free to believe whatever they want, but the rational opinion is the one that doesn't expect things to drastically change overnight for no reason.
Posted on 4/7/10 at 6:34 pm to Nuts4LSU
quote:
If the 2009 season was acceptable performance for LSU on a consistent basis, then you are laboring under the mentality of mediocrity that plagued LSU for decades
09, on the whole, was a good year. Not a great year and not an elite year, but a good year.
"Crappy" teams don't end "crappy" years in the Capital One bowl on New Years Day or nationally ranked in every poll around.
As I said, it's not called the "crappy" 20 or the "mediocre" 20, but the Top 20 of college football.
You can push that BS as much as you want, but you will get nowhere with this Tiger fan so you might as well move on down the road. I'm sure you can find other buyers for your BS, so sell it there.

Popular
Back to top
