Started By
Message

re: Many say if Les was offered, it was an offer UM knew he would turn

Posted on 1/13/11 at 8:48 pm to
Posted by tigerguy121
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
10695 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Jordy was at the meeting? If not, we all know he is always right.


Was the author of the link u post as evidence that les got an 80% offer at the meeting?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

It's funny that you make a big deal about LSU fans replying with posts regarding USC. But what does it say about you that you are registered on an LSU board.


I was born, raised, and still live in BRLA. I have followed LSU fotball for quite a while.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Was the author of the link u post as evidence that les got an 80% offer at the meeting?


No and I presented it as an opinion and asked for folks' thoughts.
Posted by tigerguy121
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
10695 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

No and I presented it as an opinion and asked for folks' thoughts.


Seems then ur quick to dismiss contrary reports as simply "person X wasn't there" rather than give your own thoughts on the subject.
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

I was born, raised, and still live in BRLA. I have followed LSU fotball for quite a while.


Doesn't change the fact that you are giving LSU "attention". It's a pathetic double standard that you are setting.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Seems then ur quick to dismiss contrary reports as simply "person X wasn't there" rather than give your own thoughts on the subject.


When they are presented as fact--yes.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:35 pm to
Does
quote:

n't change the fact that you are giving LSU "attention". It's a pathetic double standard that you are setting.


so is everyone else here who follows LSU football closely.
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

When they are presented as fact--yes.


Nothing has been presented as fact per you. "Everything is a rumor except to Miles".

Remember when you said that??

Keep the double standards coming girl.
Posted by nycajun
Nothin' could be finer.....
Member since Dec 2004
18183 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

Many say if Les was offered, it was an offer UM knew he would turn
down. ANd the offer was given as a courtesy because they had their man already. Thoughts?
Many is naive or of limited intelligence. If they had no interest in Les, they wouldn't have bothered. They had to test his willingness to make a move. What they were willing to pay and what he would require to move may not have been able to be reconciled, but the only way to find that out was to talk. The truth is that you have to try if you want to make a deal. Had the numbers worked, they would have been glad to have him. They didn't, and Les' loyalty to LSU didn't allow him to compromise as much as they would have needed, so no deal got done. It's business. Any more simplistic explanation is simply saive.
Posted by tigerguy121
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
10695 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

When they are presented as fact--yes.



Yet another post that contains nothing of substance on the issue from u.

Tell us what you think. Inquiring minds want to know. Or at the very least man up and admit you trolling.
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

so is everyone else here who follows LSU football closely.


But they are all LSU fans...it's pretty obvious you aren't.

That's a third double-standard you have set. Do I hear a fourth one coming???
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

Many is naive or of limited intelligence. If they had no interest in Les, they wouldn't have bothered.


Probabaly true. But is also probably true that the naysayers are naive or of limmited inteligence. If Les, had no interest, he would not have met with them, as he did and did in the past. If Les had no interest, he wouldn't have bothered. Let's face it, Michigan probabaly knew what it would have taken to get him and the nubers did not meet.
This post was edited on 1/13/11 at 9:45 pm
Posted by The Ramp
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2004
12247 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

LSUTANGERINE


this is a really dumb post...just saying
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

But they are all LSU fans...it's pretty obvious you aren't.

That's a third double-standard you have set. Do I hear a fourth one coming???

Not at all. As I've said I closely follow LSU FB, being born and raised in BRLA. But I don't think for one minute that the folks who incessantly introduce USC into unrelated threads follow USC football closely. Despite how you ratioanlize it, it's no double standard.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

this is a really dumb post...just saying


But it's up to six pages and still on page one three days later.
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

If Les had no interest, he wouldn't have bothered. Let's face it, Michigan probabaly knew what it would have taken to get him and the nubers did not meet.



Of course Les was interested and if the offer was too-good-to-be-true, then yeah he probably would have taken it. But maybe they weren't willing to meet his standards -- that doesn't mean they just made an offer just to say they offered.

You really have been on a roll these past 15 minutes, and not the good kind.
Posted by Tmon225
Member since Jun 2009
7250 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

Not at all. As I've said I closely follow LSU FB, being born and raised in BRLA. But I don't think for one minute that the folks who incessantly introduce USC into unrelated threads follow USC football closely. Despite how you ratioanlize it, it's no double standard.



Notice how in this back and forth we have had these past few posts, you were the first one to mention "USC".

Just keep on rolling, bro. You have already dug yourself too deep.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

that doesn't mean they just made an offer just to say they offered.


so you disagree with that man's opinion.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Notice how in this back and forth we have had these past few posts, you were the first one to mention "USC".

Just keep on rolling, bro. You have already dug yourself too deep.


BOOM BABY. It was YOU!!
quote:

It's funny that you make a big deal about LSU fans replying with posts regarding USC. But what does it say about you that you are registered on an LSU board.
This post was edited on 1/13/11 at 9:54 pm
Posted by The Ramp
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2004
12247 posts
Posted on 1/13/11 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

But it's up to six pages and still on page one three days later.


congrats. ur post is the dumb flame that attracts dumber moths
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram