- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU vs UO, First appetizer: The Nitty then on to Miami vs ya to win the Natty
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:17 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:17 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
Oregon would have finished 4th in the SEC West last year.
Na, 3rd. But here is one for ya. The year before, if Stanford was in the SEC that year, it would of been Stanford vs Oregon for the Natty that year. No joke- Stanford was tons better the year before last. But they lost tons of guys to the NFL, not to mention coach Harbaugh ...
2
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:21 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
However if you continue to assert that the PAC is a pathetic joke Conference, I am going to remind you like a water pump that you are a ranter. And if you continue to assert that Oregon could never dream to be able to play with "Big boy SEC Football", then I am going to make you look like a fool.
PLEASE show me where I said that. Please show me where I claimed that the Pac-12 was a joke. Please show me where I said that Oregon could never dream of playing big boy football.
I have no problem with the Pac-12 or Oregon football. I do however think you are a complete joke and I am sure the reason you post here is that the decent Oregon fans ran you off of their boards long ago.
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:22 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
The year before, if Stanford was in the SEC that year, it would of been Stanford vs Oregon for the Natty that year.
What a lame assertion. If LSU was in the PAC12 we would have been in the 'Natty' every year for the last 5 years. Because, ya know, I said so...
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:28 pm to TexasTiger1185
quote:
The SEC is a monster created both by itself and by other conferences. By itself because we heavily recruit the best talent and best coaches. By other conferences because y'all can't find a way to beat the best SEC team any given year.
Your own coach understands that Oregon is not on the same talent level as LSU and Alabama and whichever other SEC team shoots to the top each season. Why can't you come to grips with it?
1)USC probably would of beat the SEC Championship teams back in their prime, however unpopular on this website such a claim sounds(Nationally, the leading sports writers would agree with me)
2)I never said or suggested the SEC has been getting less talent. Don't put thoughts or words in my mouth. But on the other-hand don't pretend that the SEC supremacy over all of CFB has been going on for many generations. If truth be told, it really only came about the last 5-7 years. And might I remind you, even though I do agree the SEC has been the single best Conference for some years now, the PAC still has beat the SEC more in modern times, head to head, on the field, when it counts. I do not use that stat to say we are better per say, but I easily use it to suggest we can, and do, easily hang with you. We are the only Conference head to head that does really...And if you forget, the only time a BCS title game has been PAC vs SEC, it came down to FG winning kick as time expired. AU thumped the whole rest of the SEC, but not us. It was a close one.
And with title games, it just mainly is opinion poll of who gets in. As I suggested earlier, USC might of beat any SEC team in their prime any of those other times a SEC team got invited to it and won those...
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:32 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
Na, 3rd. But here is one for ya. The year before, if Stanford was in the SEC that year, it would of been Stanford vs Oregon for the Natty that year. No joke- Stanford was tons better the year before last. But they lost tons of guys to the NFL, not to mention coach Harbaugh ...
You Oregon guys are great.
You'll always play second fiddle to Oregon St. ... even if you have a few good years.
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:37 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
AU thumped the whole rest of the SEC, but not us. It was a close one.
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:42 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
USC probably would of beat the SEC Championship teams back in their prime, however unpopular on this website such a claim sounds(Nationally, the leading sports writers would agree with me)
2)I never said or suggested the SEC has been getting less talent. Don't put thoughts or words in my mouth. But on the other-hand don't pretend that the SEC supremacy over all of CFB has been going on for many generations. If truth be told, it really only came about the last 5-7 years. And might I remind you, even though I do agree the SEC has been the single best Conference for some years now, the PAC still has beat the SEC more in modern times, head to head, on the field, when it counts. I do not use that stat to say we are better per say, but I easily use it to suggest we can, and do, easily hang with you. We are the only Conference head to head that does really...And if you forget, the only time a BCS title game has been PAC vs SEC, it came down to FG winning kick as time expired. AU thumped the whole rest of the SEC, but not us. It was a close one.
And with title games, it just mainly is opinion poll of who gets in. As I suggested earlier, USC might of beat any SEC team in their prime any of those other times a SEC team got invited to it and won those...
First bold: Which USC team and which SEC teams? I'm talking about the last 7 years where SEC has been the only conference to win a BCS Championship.
Second bold: Where did I say any of that to put words in your mouth? I didn't.
Third bold: It has been 6 years consecutive.
Final bold: Yes, the only time SECvPAC title game who won? I don't remember yellow and green confetti.
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:43 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
You'll always play second fiddle to Oregon St. ... even if you have a few good years.
Come again???
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:50 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
AU thumped the whole rest of the SEC, but not us. It was a close one.
Oh i glanced over this one, not realizing that you were serious.
LINK
Please see above link and note such games as Miss St. (3 points), USC(8 points), Kentucky (3 points), LSU (7points), Bama (1point) These are all SEC teams on the way to their BCS win over YOUR DUCKS that they won by a single score.
Not to mention an OT win over clemson by 3 points.
So which was it, did Oregon barely lose by 3 points, or did they get thumped? Because Kentucky got thumped by 3 points, Bama got thumped by 1 point. MSU got thumped by 3 points.
Come back when you know what you are talking about jackass.
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:53 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
You know, I really should be getting paid for this education that you are receiving. Dude, you need to get a clue. The reason why many SEC fans come off as retarded is because they live in a bubble. They think the world revolves around them. They do not find out what goes on outside their bubble. They do not pay attention Nationally with other Conferences in CFB
when's the last time a team not from the SEC won the national championship? seems like we don't need to worry about whats going on outside the SEC bubble because nobody outside of the SEC bubble can beat us when it really matters... shite, i'll say it, oregon was the best team in the SEC and they got beat by double digits by the 2nd best (debated by some) team in the SEC... so frick you, and frick you again for tell us we live in a bubble.. you WISH your bubble was as prestigious as ours
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:53 pm to TexasTiger1185
quote:
First bold: Which USC team and which SEC teams? I'm talking about the last 7 years where SEC has been the only conference to win a BCS Championship.
2003 USC if played vs LSU
2006 USC if played vs UF
quote:
Second bold: Where did I say any of that to put words in your mouth? I didn't.
You kept on saying, "what you do not understand...what you do not understand..." I understood just fine. You just liked to guess as to my thoughts...
quote:
Third bold: It has been 6 years consecutive.
True. It is called East Coast Bias. Us in the West Coast have known that for a long time. The East Coast does not watch much of our football because our games are on past their bedtimes. And the SEC always gets an Auto Entry into the Title game. It would be amazing to see USC get a auto entry into the Title game every year too and see what could happen...
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:58 pm to TexasTiger1185
quote:
Come back when you know what you are talking about jackass.
I happened to watch every game live of Auburn's that year besides two rent-a-wins. Plus I re-watched many of those games again many times in the long 5 week stretch before our Natty with them to learn them well. I easily know what AU did that year. That was a figure of speech comment about how AU thumped the rest of the SEC...
Posted on 3/12/12 at 1:59 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
It is called East Coast Bias
You are just full of excuses.
Posted on 3/12/12 at 2:01 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:Why does this thread suck so much?
Or you could ask what you don't understand and I am sure someone here could fill you in...
Posted on 3/12/12 at 2:02 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
That was a figure of speech comment about how AU thumped the rest of the SEC...
I guess I don't understand how it was a close one between you and AU but they thumped the rest of the teams they beat by 3 points. Figure of speech or not it isn't accurate.
Posted on 3/12/12 at 2:06 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
so frick you, and frick you again for tell us we live in a bubble.. you WISH your inbreeding could be as prestigious as ours
No Sir I do not.
Posted on 3/12/12 at 2:07 pm to DucksflyinPAC
quote:
I happened to watch every game live of Auburn's that year besides two rent-a-wins. Plus I re-watched many of those games again many times in the long 5 week stretch before our Natty with them to learn them well.
get a life
Posted on 3/12/12 at 2:12 pm to TexasTiger1185
quote:
I guess I don't understand how it was a close one between you and AU but they thumped the rest of the teams they beat by 3 points. Figure of speech or not it isn't accurate.
AU went undefeated in the SEC that year. One in truth can say one thumped, but then another can pull out some exceptions to the norm in a attempt to disprove the claim. And ya, there are a few games here or there where they did not totally thump. However you all(for the most part) could not stop Cam Newton. He ran all over your SEC brothers. And the whole world said no way UO would be able to stop him. Ummm, we stopped him. Ya, that crappy, left Coast, Oregon Joke of a Defense, shut down Cammy Cam and held AU to half their seasons average...
Do you get it now? In many ways, we did vs AU what others in your SEC family were not able to do...
Posted on 3/12/12 at 2:12 pm to DucksflyinPAC
When will you Oregon fans realize, that having the number 1 offense means shite?
Posted on 3/12/12 at 2:13 pm to DucksflyinPAC
HOLY frick
at your first 3 games next season
at your first 3 games next season
Page 8 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News