
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU Vs Top 10 in portal transfers...
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:03 am
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:03 am
TEAM [Transfers In - Transfers Out]
1. Georgia [9-16]
2. Notre Dame [7-16]
3. Miami [13-19]
4. Ohio State [17-32]
5. Indiana [17-11]
6. Alabama [19-23]
7. Texas [22-23]
8. BYU [lol]
9. Ole Miss [30-23]
10. Texas Tech [23-21]
LSU [43-34]
LINK
I think we greatly underestimated how bad our roster situation was versus the more elite teams. Losing 34 players (even if they were bad) and gaining 43 new players (even if they are good) is crazy.
1. Georgia [9-16]
2. Notre Dame [7-16]
3. Miami [13-19]
4. Ohio State [17-32]
5. Indiana [17-11]
6. Alabama [19-23]
7. Texas [22-23]
8. BYU [lol]
9. Ole Miss [30-23]
10. Texas Tech [23-21]
LSU [43-34]
LINK
I think we greatly underestimated how bad our roster situation was versus the more elite teams. Losing 34 players (even if they were bad) and gaining 43 new players (even if they are good) is crazy.
This post was edited on 10/13/26 at 9:04 am
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:11 am to NeverLightningInTS
quote:
I think we greatly underestimated how bad our roster situation was versus the more elite teams. Losing 34 players (even if they were bad) and gaining 43 new players (even if they are good) is crazy.
Post 2019 out recruiting has not been good despite what the ratings guys have said.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:19 am to NeverLightningInTS
That's fine if LSU just lost to one of those top 10 teams (or a top 25-35 team with an established coach/roster), but they lost to a team with similar roster turnover, inferior talent, and a first-year head coach.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:38 am to NeverLightningInTS
Today's model of "program building" is an almost entirely different specie than pre-NIL.
I still have hope with Lane that our roster can again become a LA/ SETX/Gulf Coast centric roster. And where those numbers are single digits.
I still have hope with Lane that our roster can again become a LA/ SETX/Gulf Coast centric roster. And where those numbers are single digits.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:46 am to NeverLightningInTS
I think we were all aware (maybe ignoring it, but definitely aware) that growing pains were possible. Considering the extreme roster turnover, it's fair to say that this team is doing well to be as competitive as they are. With the top 2 guys on the team (both being returning players) out for this month, this team is now even more reliant on guys that haven't been here for a full year yet.
I still would say that this team underperformed against Ole Miss and Kentucky despite the roster turnover and key injuries, but this is good perspective to remember for people on this board who think the sky is falling.
I still would say that this team underperformed against Ole Miss and Kentucky despite the roster turnover and key injuries, but this is good perspective to remember for people on this board who think the sky is falling.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 9:51 am to TheChosenOne
quote:
but they lost to a team with similar roster turnover,
LSU had a total of 77 roster changes. Kentucky had 54 changes.
I’m not too good at math so I’ll let you do it.

Popular
Back to top
4









