Started By
Message

LSU Ordered to release unredacted Derrius Guice Police Reports

Posted on 1/5/21 at 9:39 pm
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24228 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 9:39 pm
Posted by 225Tyga
Member since Oct 2013
15779 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 9:45 pm to
Good. Release it all
Posted by rustyshackleferd
Member since Nov 2020
1137 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 9:51 pm to
$10/month to read the advocate

I’ve not read the police reports, so I have no idea what’s in them or what was redacted, but this article reads as if all that was redacted was student names and the reason LSU redacted those was to protect the identities of all involved after the alleged victim declined to press charges. So not sure there’s any bombshell waiting in the reports.
This post was edited on 1/5/21 at 9:51 pm
Posted by oVo
Member since Dec 2013
11796 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

LSU has been ordered to make public unredacted police records involving a former student's allegation of video voyeurism against former star running back Derrius Guice, and the university has also been ordered to pay $100 a day for the three-month period that LSU withheld those records after receiving requests for them.

In a ruling signed Dec. 29, Baton Rouge District Judge Janice Clark sided with former LSU student Samantha Brennan and USA Today in a public-records lawsuit that pitted their requests for public information against LSU's claims that they needed to protect the privacy of their students. Brennan, who accused Guice of taking and sharing a partially nude photo of her without her permission in 2016, requested a copy of the police report this year that she had filed at the time.


But LSU refused to turn over the records for months to Brennan or to USA Today, and once the university did release them, Guice's name was redacted.

Should ex-LSU star Derrius Guice's name be redacted from police report? Judge hears arguments
Should ex-LSU star Derrius Guice's name be redacted from police report? Judge hears arguments
Clark ruled that LSU was to turn over the records, free from redactions, within seven days of her judgment. She awarded Brennan and USA Today $10,000 in attorney's fees, and ruled that LSU was "unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious in its refusal and delay and the redacted manner in which the documents were produced."

That led Clark to tack on civil penalties against LSU of $100 per day between Aug. 20, 2020 — which is when Brennan first requested her police records from LSU — and Nov. 23, 2020, when the suit went to trial. The 19th Judicial District court record for the case, however, indicates that LSU has already filed an appeal.

"We are thrilled that Judge Clark ruled in favor of the reporters and Samantha in this matter," said attorney Scott Sternberg, who represented USA Today and Brennan in the lawsuit. Sternberg often represents The Advocate | Times-Picayune in litigation as well.

"By ordering the records produced, in addition to attorneys fees, costs and penalties she has set right a wrong," Sternberg said. "We look forward to continuing to fight the good fight as LSU has already appealed."

Former student who accused Derrius Guice of misconduct to take on LSU in records lawsuit
Former student who accused Derrius Guice of misconduct to take on LSU in records lawsuit
LSU's general counsel and vice president of legal affairs, however, said that the ruling would have negative impacts on future police investigations.

"The court ruling may deter victims, witnesses or bystanders from reporting or participating in investigations of misconduct as their identities will no longer be protected," said Winston DeCuir, Jr. "As part of our ongoing commitment to protecting our students' physical safety, privacy and well-being, we reviewed the ruling and will appeal the decision because of the long-term implications for students participating in the university's investigatory process."


Police departments across the state often release unredacted police reports, even in cases like Brennan's that do not lead to further investigation and prosecution. Clark also specified in her ruling that the victim's name — Brennan — should continue to be withheld. Brennan also cheered the ruling on Tuesday, posting on Twitter, "FINALLY! The verdict we have been waiting for."

LSU released Brennan's police reports after Brennan and USA Today filed their lawsuit but before the issue went before Clark for a hearing. The university also redacted Guice's name in every instance that it appeared. Brennan testified in court on Nov. 23 that Guice's name was underneath the redactions, while LSU's attorneys objected to her revelation of his name. Brennan had already publicly told her story multiple times by then, first to USA Today for an investigation they published Nov. 16 into LSU's handling of sexual assaults.

'A huge emotional toll': Victims detail LSU's weak punishments for sexual misconduct
'A huge emotional toll': Victims detail LSU's weak punishments for sexual misconduct
Guice, who played for the Washington Football Team in the NFL, was arrested in August on domestic violence charges. His attorney has denied he did anything wrong, but multiple women have told USA Today that Guice raped them at LSU.

Attorney Scott Sternberg, who represented USA Today and Brennan, said at the time that their need to file a lawsuit for LSU to produce any of Brennan's records indicated that they were, at least, entitled to attorney's fees and court costs. But Sternberg also made a broader argument that LSU should not have withheld the records to begin with, and that LSU should not have redacted Guice's name once the university finally did release the records.


LSU's legal team countered that the university does not generally release unredacted police reports when they involve incidents that do not lead to arrests or further investigation, citing privacy interests for students. Brennan told police back in 2016 that she was not interested at the time in pursuing a criminal case against Guice.

'We are here for you': Hundreds of LSU students protest in wake of sexual assault scandals
'We are here for you': Hundreds of LSU students protest in wake of sexual assault scandals
LSU also leaned on an internal policy — which Sternberg pointed out was not enshrined in state law — that the school does not release police reports until the statute of limitations for a crime expires. In Brennan's case, the video voyeurism charges that Guice could theoretically have faced has a six year statute of limitations.

The state law that governs when such reports can be made public says that records can be released once no criminal action is “reasonably anticipated." Other police departments often release them before the statute of limitations has expired.

Clark heard arguments from both sides on Nov. 23 in open court, and asked each side to submit a brief afterward that she said she would look over before issuing a ruling. Her ruling against LSU is likely to be one of her last from the bench, as Clark has hit the mandatory retirement age for judges in Louisiana. Her final term ended Dec. 31, 2020.
Posted by oVo
Member since Dec 2013
11796 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 9:54 pm to
saved you 10 bucks
Posted by jlovel7
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
21305 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 9:57 pm to
Why does LSU have those and nobody else does?
Posted by rustyshackleferd
Member since Nov 2020
1137 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 9:58 pm to
My man. I don’t even think the WSJ charges that much

Just checked. They don’t
This post was edited on 1/5/21 at 10:05 pm
Posted by oVo
Member since Dec 2013
11796 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 10:08 pm to
Posted by CBP3110
Member since Aug 2012
6495 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 10:10 pm to
So he just shared a nude photo?
Posted by rustyshackleferd
Member since Nov 2020
1137 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 10:15 pm to
Allegedly. No charges were filed.
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
66404 posts
Posted on 1/5/21 at 11:47 pm to
So the NFL obviously got wind of this before the draft because Guice dropped so far .... while everyone on TD couldn’t understand it.

So someone knew, and someone was leaking it to the NFL. I wonder if that was an LSU connection ... seems like it would be. If so, I wonder who? Who knew what and when?
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24228 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 5:35 am to
quote:

I wonder if that was an LSU connection ... seems like it would be. If so, I wonder who? Who knew what and when?


If I recall correctly, O didn’t hide anything from them. That may be good for O if true. The rumor was he dropped because O told them he was “immature”, played video games a lot, etc. but really it may have been this.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
14801 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 5:36 am to
The advocate should be doing anything but picking a fight with LSU. They are a dying fake news media rag. If LSU simply iced them out and never responded to them or gave their beat writers access to anything they would be finished. LSU doesn’t need the advocate to help its brand
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42370 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 5:54 am to
They already released it but as previous poster said they blacked out the names for student privacy protection since no charges were filed
Posted by Cajun Tifoso
Lafayette, LA
Member since Sep 2010
2558 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 7:07 am to
Janice Clark? Well, that ruling was never in doubt.
Posted by TigerDat
Member since Aug 2010
7628 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 7:18 am to
quote:

They already released it but as previous poster said they blacked out the names for student privacy protection since no charges were filed



Well I mean of they can't see the names, how are they going to make their say her name stickers???
Posted by Delacroix22
Member since Aug 2013
3945 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 7:21 am to
quote:

So he just shared a nude photo?


Apparently he met the girl at a bar and introduced by Friend X who if I remember correctly isn’t a football player but had some ancillary student worker role with the team. It’s been a month or two since I read the details. Guice ends up at her place and she’s drunk and doesn’t really remember inviting him over. It isn’t known but they definitely have sex. And Guice snaps a picture of her naked without her knowing. Friend X either shows to other people or something or Guice does. Anyways. Guice leaves in the morning before she wakes up. Texts her later if he left his wallet there. The girl never exchanged numbers with Guice. And so she says yes you did leave your wallet and how did you get my number. He says don’t worry about it and sends his friend to pick up his wallet.

Whether sending a naked picture without consent is criminal I don’t know. They definitely had sex while she barely remembered it. And sending his friend to get his wallet in the morning is just scuzzy. It borders on criminal/creepy/douchey.

And honestly the unredacted reports definitely should be released. How could anyone argue against this.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9292 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 7:31 am to
quote:

And honestly the unredacted reports definitely should be released. How could anyone argue against this.

I don’t really give a shite about protecting Guice’s privacy at this point, but I do question whether this sets a good precedent.
Posted by Locoguan0
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2017
4228 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 7:38 am to
If I work for someone and there is a sexual assault situation being covered up, I damn sure would be the person who leaks it to the press. frick that dude.
Posted by RealityTiger
Geismar, LA
Member since Jan 2010
20438 posts
Posted on 1/6/21 at 7:50 am to
quote:

So he just shared a nude photo?


This is all that he's being accused of? I was under the impression that there was more.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram