- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU Men's hoops
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:14 pm to Tiger Ugly
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:14 pm to Tiger Ugly
I changed by name to the current one in '05 or so. Started out as BengalDore.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:15 pm to Tiger Ugly
quote:
I'll put it another way, if losing a player who was averaging 11 points and 6 rebounds in 8 games against a modest OOC schedule last year was a HUGE loss, which the way I perceive it translates to a season crushing loss... then the foundation for the program was not where it needed to be in year 3....IMHO.
Those are two different points of contention.
Reed was competent & trusting and no, they do not have the depth to replace him,
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:17 pm to Madking
You forgot to upvote that post, Lying King
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:21 pm to Tiger Ugly
You’re correct, we have a 50 game sample size with Reed vs P5 opponents and his averages are 6.1ppg, 3.7rebs on 46% shooting. The mcmen and their new fanboy want you to think he’s a lottery pick but he’s just a replaceable bench guy. He’s being used as an excuse because the roster wasn’t constructed well and they won’t put that on McMahon.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:23 pm to Lester Earl
So he’s not your first guest? I know it won’t be Waters or Naz or Cam or Days or Watford because you hated those players. I thought for sure it would be Seneca, the GOAT in your opinion.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:26 pm to Lester Earl
I know, someone from the McMahon era. Who’s his most productive player?…. K.J. Williams, you can have him on your make believe show.. but I forgot, you hated him too.
This post was edited on 12/31/25 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:28 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
hose are two different points of contention.
Reed was competent & trusting and no, they do not have the depth to replace him,
Semantics Lester - you think it was a huge and understated loss. I think it was stated ad nauseum and that it was a somewhat significant but overstated loss.
By saying it was a HUGE loss you are in my view saying had we kept him we could have achieved something of significance.
I'm saying I don't really think that it would have made a big difference much as I would have loved to have had him, but even if you think it would be that's not a good statement about the overall standing of the program if a guy averaging 11 and 6 getting hurt torpedoes the season.
We are in a better position to overcome probably a less significant loss this year - I hope we do. I have no interest in us losing I'd rather win.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:32 pm to I-59 Tiger
quote:
I changed by name to the current one in '05 or so. Started out as BengalDore.
Yes, I remember you well. Happy New Year my friend.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:34 pm to Madking
I didn’t hate them as much as you hated the will Wade hire and Jay Johnson lmao
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:38 pm to Lester Earl
Fake news but you did hate them. You hated them even more when they proved you wrong because you’re not an LSU fan you’re a New Orleans Tulane trash in reality. What’s worse is the more they succeed the more you hate those players.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:47 pm to Madking
You lie even more when you melt.
Melt, bitch melt lmao
Melt, bitch melt lmao
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:56 pm to Lester Earl
The irony is priceless, especially from a known troll like you
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:58 pm to Madking
quote:So you are denying that your belief that we were always well funded with NIL is based on recruiting rankings? Because that is the only argument that I have seen you make.
I did deny it
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:01 pm to mmcgrath
You’re conflating three things in order to mislead like always.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:06 pm to Madking
quote:
So you are denying that your belief that we were always well funded with NIL is based on recruiting rankings? Because that is the only argument that I have seen you make.
No, but the entire point you are arguing about being trash for the last 3 seasons due to lack of NIL funding is totally invalid.
There was more than an adequate amount of talent on McMahons teams to be better than 14-40 over the last 3 seasons in conference play.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:12 pm to WaydownSouth
This excuse was manufactured last spring as a PR stunt just the way ALT laid out. So it wasn’t an issue before, they pretended like they’d just discovered NIL . The entire thing was performative but the mcmen will cling to any story to deflect from McMahon’s record so it’s been adopted as part of their religious doctrine.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:15 pm to Madking
quote:I am not conflating anything. I am very specifically asking you what supports your beliefs on NIL. You claimed that everyone is lying. That's not proof. That is insanity.
You’re conflating three things in order to mislead like always.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:17 pm to Tiger Ugly
quote:
Yes, I remember you well. Happy New Year my friend.
Thank you,sir! You as well. Your level headed, knowledgeable unemotional posts are always appreciated.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:22 pm to mmcgrath
The NCAA report that was released and posted during spring. It had NIL spending for the 24-25 seasons and had the revenue sharing projections moving forward. It was a multi page report that was posted in multiple threads. You also assuredly saw it. But that’s irrelevant to having multiple Top 15 composite classes and producing 5 combined wins in two seasons then having you lot blame talent which was the actual point.
This post was edited on 12/31/25 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:24 pm to mmcgrath
I didn’t say everyone was lying and you can’t provide any evidence to support your NIL narrative so like always you accuse others of what you’re doing.
Popular
Back to top



1



