- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU-Alabama Rivalry (WE NEED A NAME FOR THIS RIVALRY)
Posted on 2/4/09 at 10:51 pm to geauxtigahs87
Posted on 2/4/09 at 10:51 pm to geauxtigahs87
I just want to know this:
Why the hell do so many Bama fans post here and follow so religiously? I mean damn, do they think they are running recon for Saban and will find some crucial nugget of info?
Alabama isn't out biggest rival. For LSU, everybody is our rival. And I kind of like it that way. We don't spend all year stewing about effin Auburn, Arkansas, Bama, or Ole Miss. We don't like ANY of em. It's unique in my opinion.
Why the hell do so many Bama fans post here and follow so religiously? I mean damn, do they think they are running recon for Saban and will find some crucial nugget of info?
Alabama isn't out biggest rival. For LSU, everybody is our rival. And I kind of like it that way. We don't spend all year stewing about effin Auburn, Arkansas, Bama, or Ole Miss. We don't like ANY of em. It's unique in my opinion.
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:02 pm to Cincinnati Bowtie
quote:
CLASS VS. arse
No, that's different. I almost wrecked my college career in my soph year by choosing the latter most of the time.
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:05 pm to ffishstik
I agree. You kids are oozing of class. Wait, damn. My trash needs to be picked up...
*dialing 504 area code*
*dialing 504 area code*
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:11 pm to JPLSU1981
Tennessee is Bama's biggest rival. Auburn is the most hated. Lsu will never replace that. Now, having said that, it does not mean that the Bama/Lsu game will not be the most important in the years to come. I believe that game will decide who has a chance to play for the SEC CG from the west and possibly will place one or the other in a position for a title run in the coming years. Congrats on another great recruiting class and can't wait until November. 
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:23 pm to 504Saint
How about "The Rivalry That Exists Only Because Georgia Tech Stopped Playing Alabama?"
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:31 pm to JPLSU1981
If Alabama fans were forced to choose one, and only one, of the following three games to win
Trust me on this, you are 100% wrong.
quote:
next season, which one do you think they would choose?
Auburn
Tennessee
LSU
Despite what anyone claims, I guarantee you that deep down 90% of Bama fans would choose LSU out of those three
Trust me on this, you are 100% wrong.
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:39 pm to DoubleDown
quote:
My trash needs to be picked up...
*dialing 504 area code*
Oh, your wife left you again for a real man in Baton Rouge.
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:41 pm to JPLSU1981
Barn will always be our rivalry game. I'd rather beat them by 50 every year. Now LSU is begining to become a big game because of the importance to the SEC west so it's becoming a big game but it's not a rivalry game.
Posted on 2/4/09 at 11:50 pm to los angeles tiger
Wow. You tried to pick on my wife? She can distinguish between a real co** and bal** and a kid that tries to have a little of both.
I'll see you in Title Town, Chief!
LINK
THIS JUST IN ... LSU... PICK SIX!
I'll see you in Title Town, Chief!
LINK
THIS JUST IN ... LSU... PICK SIX!
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:03 am to DoubleDown
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:04 am to DoubleDown
quote:
THIS JUST IN ... LSU... PICK SIX!
2000,2001,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007- Na, we chose to pick 7 this decade
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:12 am to Mrs. Amaro
Hmmm, I'm confused. LSU fans tell bama fans not to live in the past - yet, you want to live in the past except for last year?!
Please enlighten me... if you can...
Please enlighten me... if you can...
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:14 am to DoubleDown
This decade is hardly the past, the past (when yall were great) was back when they had one bar face masks.
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:15 am to DoubleDown
lsu2006, you beat me to it. you win an internet.
as for dialing 504whatever. great. you just got Tulane. have fun with that.
as for dialing 504whatever. great. you just got Tulane. have fun with that.
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:16 am to DoubleDown
quote:
Hmmm, I'm confused. LSU fans tell bama fans not to live in the past - yet, you want to live in the past except for last year?!
Please enlighten me... if you can...
theres a big difference it what happened the last 5 years compared to 30-50 years ago gump.
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:17 am to Mrs. Amaro
Do we count last year as bama being "great"? I would say no - only the new coming of a dynasty. We measure greatness by Championships, SEC and National.
You measure them by what? How great you've done in the last 5-10 years?! Seems like a "whatever we want to measure it by" stick...
Check LSU's history! You shall be repeating it with a quickness... son...
You measure them by what? How great you've done in the last 5-10 years?! Seems like a "whatever we want to measure it by" stick...
Check LSU's history! You shall be repeating it with a quickness... son...
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:20 am to am4titansandlsu
I agree theres a difference and I hate to see my fellow bammers bask in the glory days as I was not even alive to see them. But since we're all clear, lets go ahead and put a time table on what "the past" is so no one gets confused. If we go back to 02 when we beat ya'll is that the past? What about 03 when ya'll beat us in Bryant Denny?
From my understanding anything that was not last year or a current streak is considered "the past." Therefore all those wins would still be considered the past. If your thoughts are different, please let me know.
From my understanding anything that was not last year or a current streak is considered "the past." Therefore all those wins would still be considered the past. If your thoughts are different, please let me know.
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:25 am to IHateOrange
IHate,
It's all about what they want to make it. If it's about the "bear" then it's "the past" and it can be made fun of. Yet, if it's about there 1.0 national championships (0.5 in 2003 and 0.5 in 2007) then we can't dare dispute that because the NCAA said so (Playoffs what?!)! Then again, we can't get too recent because this seasons win was a fluke and Saban cheated and JPW raped somebody's mother or something of the sort....
blahdiddy blah blah....
LINK
It's all about what they want to make it. If it's about the "bear" then it's "the past" and it can be made fun of. Yet, if it's about there 1.0 national championships (0.5 in 2003 and 0.5 in 2007) then we can't dare dispute that because the NCAA said so (Playoffs what?!)! Then again, we can't get too recent because this seasons win was a fluke and Saban cheated and JPW raped somebody's mother or something of the sort....
blahdiddy blah blah....
LINK
This post was edited on 2/5/09 at 12:37 am
Posted on 2/5/09 at 12:55 am to DoubleDown
quote:
et, if it's about there 1.0 national championships (0.5 in 2003 and 0.5 in 2007)
You inbred gump piece of trailerpark shite don't even get me started on your unfathomable number of fluky/falsely/wrongly claimed titles
Popular
Back to top


0




