- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSP release Lacy info in reference to Lacy attorney misinformation
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:35 pm to PurpNGold1985
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:35 pm to PurpNGold1985
quote:
I’ve analyzed, investigated, drawn, and done crash reconstruction on almost 150 crashes so where’s your expertise, Sammy?
we are doing an accident reconstruction. we know how it happened. we’re determining fault.
2
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:35 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
It's what I do every day. No idea on a number. I defend insurance companies .
Then you know how man of your cases aren’t caused by a random 3rd vehicle that doesn’t hit anyone.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 4:37 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:37 pm to SammyTiger
Fault and reconstruction go hand in hand brother. The results of the reconstruxtion determine who is at fault.
You’re probably some plant worker trying to tell several people in the crash investigation field how their jobs are done.
Give it up. I thought you were a shitey poster for baseball but this ignorance takes the cake.
You’re probably some plant worker trying to tell several people in the crash investigation field how their jobs are done.
Give it up. I thought you were a shitey poster for baseball but this ignorance takes the cake.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:38 pm to SammyTiger
Not a single crash in the history of the world was an accidents they’re called crashes in our profession for a reason. Every MVC has an event that triggers the crash. Therefore not an accident.
But keep acting like you know the law and what you’re talking about. Some of us have been at this for 15+ years
But keep acting like you know the law and what you’re talking about. Some of us have been at this for 15+ years
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:38 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
If you couldn’t defend lacy you’re a fricking BUM
And you wonder why people think you have an agenda
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 4:40 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:39 pm to PurpNGold1985
quote:
Fault and reconstruction go hand in hand brother. The results of the reconstruxtion determine who is at fault.
The law determines whoes at fault.
99.9% of cases don’t need an accident deconstructionist to figure that out.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:39 pm to PurpNGold1985
quote:
You honestly think KL didn’t realize that he did something wrong?
Did I say that? I did not. I asked how Lacy or any driver is supposed to know that they were the cause of an accident in which their vehicle is not directly involved? Lacy is definitely guilty of speeding and reckless driving. Negligent homicide? No. Hit and run? Not beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:42 pm to WeeWee
It’s the gd law you dunce. It’s a law written for exactly this circumstance. I encourage you to pick up literature that explains what a non contact hit and run is. I’ve ticketed probably 15 people for exactly this (after having to scour video and witness evidence)
Muh in my mind it’s not a thing. Muh fuk state traffic statutes
You people are pathetic.
Muh in my mind it’s not a thing. Muh fuk state traffic statutes
You people are pathetic.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:42 pm to SammyTiger
It’s reconstructionist and you’re an idiot.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:45 pm to CootKilla
Pride linked it .. page 19.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:47 pm to RB10
And you wonder why people think you have an agenda
i don’t
you can look at my history when he was alive and I am not even a fan
We aren’t talking about a car lacy hit
we aren’t talking about a car that would have hit lacy
We are talking about a car that swerved to avoid rear ending a car that successfully avoided Lacy because she couldn’t successfully stop.
Both Lacy and Funyons were driving dangerously, only 1 of them hit a car.
i don’t
you can look at my history when he was alive and I am not even a fan
We aren’t talking about a car lacy hit
we aren’t talking about a car that would have hit lacy
We are talking about a car that swerved to avoid rear ending a car that successfully avoided Lacy because she couldn’t successfully stop.
Both Lacy and Funyons were driving dangerously, only 1 of them hit a car.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:49 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
i don’t
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:51 pm to RB10
quote:
The people saying he "coached" or "coaxed" a statement out of the witnesses are viewing the situation with blinders on. He's simply repeating their statements back to them to get a coherent version onto paper.
Why is there no audio or video recording of those conversations?
quote:
The moment the trooper arrived at the scene he was bombarded with people giving their account. The very first one being someone in an Astros shirt asking if he caught the Green Charger because they caused the accident and ending with every one of the eyewitnesses giving a similar statement. Green charger caused the accident. So of course he is going to be talking about and trying to point to a green charger being the cause, it's what he was told
That is no excuse for basically telling witnesses what to say in their statement.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:52 pm to WeeWee
quote:
Why is there no audio or video recording of those conversations?
There is. Just go watch the first few minutes of his arrival on this scene.
quote:
That is no excuse for basically telling witnesses what to say in their statement.
Sure it is, if he's simply repeating their statements back to them and telling them to write it that way.
This is how you avoid the telephone game effect. The only reason to assume something nefarious is going on is because you already don't like police officers.
This post was edited on 10/7/25 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:54 pm to SammyTiger
Every fatality in Louisiana requires a reconstructionist to shoot, draw, measure, and produce findings on the MVC. Again I don’t expect you to know this bc you know as much about policing and law as the idiots under the WAFB post on FB.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 4:56 pm to RB10
RB 10 you have some of the most well thought out posts on this thread. Kudos to you for taking off your P&G glasses and seeing facts and sequence of events.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 5:00 pm to bwallcubfan
quote:
If Kyren isn’t driving recklessly, we’re not sitting here having these conversations.
It’s all so tiresome. Ryan Clark gets on TV and proclaims Lacy is “innocent” even though he’s on video putting everyone’s life on the road in danger—and at a bare minimum being a contributing factor to the crash (truck braking to avoid him).
But he’s innocent, ok. And I’m sure whatever led to the police chase where he killed himself, he was innocent there too.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 5:02 pm to PurpNGold1985
quote:
It’s the gd law you dunce. It’s a law written for exactly this circumstance. I encourage you to pick up literature that explains what a non contact hit and run is. I’ve ticketed probably 15 people for exactly this (after having to scour video and witness evidence)
How many of those people were convicted beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury of their peers?
quote:
Muh in my mind it’s not a thing. Muh fuk state traffic statutes
Are you having a seizure?
quote:
You people are pathetic.
Why are you against an independent review of the incident, investigation, and prosecution process? Are you afraid to risk the world finding out that one of your beloved brethren of the badge made a mistake?
FTR I am not saying Lacy was innocent. I am saying that there are major flaws in the LSP’s handling of the matter and it needs investigating. That is it.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 5:05 pm to WeeWee
quote:
How many of those people were convicted beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury of their peers?
Considering I had to testify in court and reply to and explain the evidence, 11 of the 15 were found guilty of reckless behavior causing a MVC with no contact to the other vehicles in the collision.
What’s your profession? Just curious, bc you seem to think you’re a law enforcement officer who has continuing education to make these declarations. Congrats.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 5:10 pm to zuluboudreaux
Idk if this opinion has been stated before, so I apologize in advance if so. I feel like Kyren wasn’t the cause in the manner they make it out to be. He for sure was doing some illegal things and that if he hadn’t been, then mistakes made by the drivers overreacting wouldn’t have had the opportunity to happen. But sheesh man, the woman who impacted Herman Hall has to somewhat be in question also. We find out the gold truck never even braked and even if he did, how is the reaction of this woman to swerve into oncoming traffic. If you’re trying to avoid being hit head on by someone 70 yards away, you don’t swerve into oncoming traffic of people 10 yards of way and still hit someone head on. This woman has a duty to still even in panic operate her car safely. Once again we can theorize that Kyren just driving in his lane would have avoided the whole mess but still.
Page 28 of 60
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News