- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/15/18 at 9:42 am to TheHat7
I have documented proof that in June of last year I said Narcisse would end up starting over Brennon. I actually said it before then, but I made documentation so that the people I told it to would remember that I said it.
Just want to mention that.
Just want to mention that.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 9:46 am to TheHat7
I guess we will find out next week in the spring game. i say give Breenan and give Narcisse equal snaps at QB. Let them play each a half against the numbers 1's on defense. Whoever shines should get the node heading into the fall.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 9:46 am to OweO
quote:
have documented proof that in June of last year I said Narcisse would end up starting over Brennon. I actually said it before then, but I made documentation so that the people I told it to would remember that I said it.
Just want to mention that.
So?
Document this....O is complimenting LN publicly yo keep him from transferring. Stevie Wonder can see whi is the starter...and rightfully so
Posted on 4/15/18 at 9:47 am to TheHat7
delete
This post was edited on 4/15/18 at 9:48 am
Posted on 4/15/18 at 9:47 am to TheHat7
delete
This post was edited on 4/15/18 at 9:48 am
Posted on 4/15/18 at 10:23 am to HeavyD
quote:
The next legend of backup QB’s at LSU. Always the most popular.
Rant creed.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 10:29 am to lsu2006
quote:
King Lowell comin’
This is just creepy.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 10:34 am to the LSUSaint
Brother I’m telling u right now neither is ready at this moment. Hopefully summer strides take place. Hopefully that other 65% ed was talking about will help either shine.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 10:45 am to 5Alive
I'm pretty sure everyone would agree with that.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 10:49 am to 5Alive
quote:
Brother I’m telling u right now neither is ready at this moment. Hopefully summer strides take place. Hopefully that other 65% ed was talking about will help either shine.
I get your point. But its irrelevant because come September one of them will be under center. The one closer to be ready to do that is MB. I'm no LN hater, but no one with a lick of football sense would think LN is ready to run as starter in an SEC offense after playing VERY few games in his last 2 years of high school, compared to MB who at least has years more experience than LN, at this point.
There is no doubt that LN is a tremendous athlete. And we will see that displayed in packages, I'm sure.
But that in no way means hes ready to run the offense and passing game. I do know our passing game relies on progressions and reads to work better than a qb being forced to run. When a solid offensive line is in place, running should be the very very last option for a qb.
Good for LSU to have 2 studs! All good scrimmages help LN grow into what we need. But let me be clear, MB will be the starting QB this year and for that reason alone he should and will receive most of the work with the 1s in fall.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 10:54 am to Geaux Engineer
quote:
We don't have the stats from the fist scrimmage.
We definitely have more than just the one scrimmage you're using to proclaim people are "butthurt" about Narcisse. I don't care who starts, but the overall numbers from the spring point to Brennan being ahead of Narcisse at this point. You using one scrimmage to try and paint a different picture is laughable.
This post was edited on 4/15/18 at 11:01 am
Posted on 4/15/18 at 11:34 am to BillF
quote:
Namath? He could hardly walk when he was in the NFL. Rivers couldn't beat Mettenberger in a foot race, but the guy can play. Amazing how so many guys like Brady and Brees and both Mannings win Super Bowls, but folks figure LSU has to have a running quarterback to win.
How many of those guys you mentioned won NCs in college? The past decade has proven that a mobile QB is needed to win it all in college. One-dimensional QBs who can’t provide a threat with their legs don’t cut it anymore.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 11:38 am to the paradigm
quote:
One-dimensional QBs who can’t provide a threat with their legs don’t cut it anymore.
Well, this is just plain false. Mobil QBs provide an extra dimension, but to declare that pocket passers "can't" win a national title is ridiculous.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 11:39 am to semjase
quote:
LSU aint winning the SEC without a QB that can throw the ball. Aint winning the SEC because they have an athletic QB that can run fast either. (That's what running backs are for)
They ain’t winning the SEC with a one-dimensional QB that doesn’t provide a running threat, either.
The accuracy thing with Lowell is way overblown. He might not be as accurate as Brennan from the pocket, but I guarantee he’s more accurate when scrambling/on the run. He is plenty accurate and coupled with his running ability, he provides the BEST chance of winning a championship.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 11:41 am to the paradigm
quote:
The accuracy thing with Lowell is way overblown. He might not be as accurate as Brennan from the pocket, but I guarantee he’s more accurate when scrambling/on the run. He is plenty accurate and coupled with his running ability, he provides the BEST chance of winning a championship.
I love when people think that making shite up is a valid argument. Everything in this post is pure conjecture.
Posted on 4/15/18 at 11:46 am to RB10
In order for a one-dimensional QB to win it all, you gotta have elite-level talent across the board, on both offense and defense. That’s how Bama was able to pull it off. Who else over the past decade has won with a pro style QB?
This post was edited on 4/15/18 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 4/15/18 at 11:50 am to the paradigm
quote:
In order for a one-dimensional QB to win it all, you gotta have elite-level talent across the hoard, on both offense and defense. That’s how Bama was able to pull it off. Who else over the past decade has won with a pro style QB?
All I've said is that claiming it "can't" or "won't" be done is ridiculous, which you've just reaffirmed.
ETA: Every national title winner has elite talent at most positions. This notion that it's only needed for pocket passers is also wrong.
This post was edited on 4/15/18 at 11:51 am
Posted on 4/15/18 at 12:00 pm to RB10
You’re telling me that Lowell being more accurate on the run is conjecture?


Posted on 4/15/18 at 12:02 pm to RB10
You still never answered my question. Who else, other than Bama, has done it?
Popular
Back to top


1



