- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's talk about this wildly overrated Clemson defense....
Posted on 8/20/25 at 9:25 am to Gulf Coast Tiger
Posted on 8/20/25 at 9:25 am to Gulf Coast Tiger
quote:
They have a lot of the same players ba
LSUs 2019 unstoppable offense looked nothing like the 2018 offense, despite having primarily the same offensive players back.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 9:54 am to Roscoe
quote:
LSUs 2019 unstoppable offense looked nothing like the 2018 offense, despite having primarily the same offensive players back.
A complete, ground-up offensive scheme and philosophy change played a massive role there. Especially when that new scheme happened to be something our starting QB was much more used to and comfortable running.
Tom Allen is a good or better DC, but he’s not going to be re-inventing the wheel at Clemson. Based on their own media reports, they aren’t undergoing that kind of massive overhaul. Maybe he does a better job developing their players and that makes a big difference, but let’s not act like the 2019 LSU offense is an apples to apples comparison.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 10:21 am to misey94
In an ideal situation, I agree with that statement you want the same 5 guys out there every snap.
BK said in the press conference that Curne, Weston, Chester, Echols, Paul will all be getting in the game. The competition is good but I'd like to know who the best 5 genuinely are at their positions.
BK said in the press conference that Curne, Weston, Chester, Echols, Paul will all be getting in the game. The competition is good but I'd like to know who the best 5 genuinely are at their positions.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 10:27 am to mwade91383
So if we light them up we shouldn’t get excited ?
Posted on 8/20/25 at 10:30 am to misey94
quote:
A complete, ground-up offensive scheme and philosophy change played a massive role there. Especially when that new scheme happened to be something our starting QB was much more used to and comfortable running. Tom Allen is a good or better DC, but he’s not going to be re-inventing the wheel at Clemson. Based on their own media reports, they aren’t undergoing that kind of massive overhaul. Maybe he does a better job developing their players and that makes a big difference, but let’s not act like the 2019 LSU offense is an apples to apples comparison.
I’d actually argue Clemson’s situation is similar to LSU’s 2018–19 offensive leap. It wasn’t just “the same players returning” — it was a scheme change that let those players play to their strengths.
Last year, Clemson’s biggest issue was not having a true DE opposite T.J. Parker. That forced Peter Woods (then 340 lbs) to play out of position on the edge, where he struggled to set the edge. When he slid back inside, he was dominant, but the revolving door at the other DE spot got exposed over and over.
Enter the Purden transfer who LSU and aTm were after - Will Heldt. His job isn’t to be a flashy pass rusher — it’s to lock down the edge so Woods (now down to 300) can wreck people inside and Parker can hunt QBs outside. And by all accounts, he has had a great spring and fall camp.
Tom Allen has already said fixing that structural flaw is his top defensive priority. That’s more than just “tweaks.” It’s a schematic reset, exactly like what LSU’s offense experienced in 2019 — putting players in the right spots and building the system around their strengths.
So no, it’s not just “bad players coming back.” It’s good players in the wrong roles last year now being put in the right roles under a DC who emphasizes discipline, takeaways, and edge integrity. That’s why Clemson’s defense is being projected for a big jump.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 10:31 am to lsutiger251
quote:
The competition is good but I'd like to know who the best 5 genuinely are at their positions.
I don’t disagree. The competition will highlight the best 5, but I think we all wish it had already settled things.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 10:40 am to Roscoe
quote:
Tom Allen has already said fixing that structural flaw is his top defensive priority. That’s more than just “tweaks.” It’s a schematic reset, exactly like what LSU’s offense experienced in 2019 — putting players in the right spots and building the system around their strengths.
I disagree. While that’s an important tweak, and one that may prove to be valuable for them, a schematic change is moving from a 4 man front to a 3, or shifting from a base zone to base man. You are talking about bringing in one guy from the portal and changing a couple of roles up front based on that addition. Thats not that much different than Baker moving Perkins to Star and changing DL rotations based on the multiple new players we brought in up front.
Our 2019 offense went from forcing Burrow to play mostly under center in 2018, which he had never done before, to paying almost exclusively spread formations out of the shotgun. We went from the bottom 1/3 in the FBS is tempo and number of plays in 2018 to the fastest offense in football in 2019. That is a far more radical shift that affected more players than playing the same basic alignment and overall scheme, bringing in a portal player, and changing some individual roles in one position group.
Again, this change may be very impactful for Clemson, but it’s just not an apples to apples comparison at all.
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 11:12 am to vidtiger23
It's a bit silly to assume they're overrated based on the previous season. They have a new DC this season. Depends on how quickly he can get it going and the level of talent on the team. That being said, I hope that are overrated.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 11:34 am to misey94
My understanding is that there is a scheme change as well. Under Wes Goodwin, Clemson’s base was the more traditional 4–3. Tom Allen is installing a 4–2–5, which is a different structure that emphasizes edge integrity and adds more flexibility against spread offenses. So it’s not just “one portal guy and some tweaks up front” — it’s also a systemic change in how the defense aligns and operates.
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:02 pm to Lige
NEVER take a win for granted, esp a road win.
I just don’t think their D is as good as it’s being hyped to be, that’s all!
I just don’t think their D is as good as it’s being hyped to be, that’s all!
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:12 pm to Roscoe
quote:
My understanding is that there is a scheme change as well. Under Wes Goodwin, Clemson’s base was the more traditional 4–3. Tom Allen is installing a 4–2–5, which is a different structure that emphasizes edge integrity and adds more flexibility against spread offenses. So it’s not just “one portal guy and some tweaks up front” — it’s also a systemic change in how the defense aligns and operates.
That depends. A lot of teams say they are a base 4-3 and then spend around 75% of their snaps in Nickle or Dime and only play a 3rd LB on obvious running and short yardage downs. We have been an exception when Perkins has played OLB, but playing that position the majority of snaps is rare today unless you are using a hybrid like Baker’s Star role. And even then the Star is looked at more as a Safety, than an LB.
My point is that, while the philosophy may be a bit different now, I would bet you Clemson played a lot of 4-2-5 personnel last season, especially vs teams with good QBs.
This post was edited on 8/20/25 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 8/20/25 at 12:28 pm to Switchup91
quote:
It's a bit silly to assume they're overrated based on the previous season. They have a new DC this season. Depends on how quickly he can get it going and the level of talent on the team. That being said, I hope that are overrated.
I don’t think we can say they are overrated yet but I do think that I feel better about playing them Game 1 when they are trying to execute their D changes in live play for the first time.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 4:05 pm to ATLTiger24
LSU has so many receivers, I'm not sure if Clemson is capable of covering all of them.. Nick/Aaron Anderson, Chris Hilton, Barion Brown- I don't know man, if our O-Line can hold them back long enough for Nuss to release, we should be alright.
I am curious to see how the O-Line holds up, that's our biggest question mark. I guess is the defense as improved as well, or is our new O-Line just that bad. Time will tell
I am curious to see how the O-Line holds up, that's our biggest question mark. I guess is the defense as improved as well, or is our new O-Line just that bad. Time will tell
Popular
Back to top

1







